Articles | Volume 30, issue 12
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-3945-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-3945-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Comparing multi-model mosaic and multi-model combination methods to simulate streamflow across the contiguous USA
Cyril Thébault
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Schulich School of Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Wouter J. M. Knoben
Schulich School of Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Nans Addor
Fathom, Bristol, UK
Geography, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
Andrew J. Newman
RAL, NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado, USA
Diana Spieler
Schulich School of Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Nicolás A. Vásquez
Schulich School of Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Yalan Song
Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA
Gaby J. Gründemann
Schulich School of Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Shaun Carney
Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
Mukesh Kumar
Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, USA
Katie van Werkhoven
Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
Chaopeng Shen
Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA
Andrew W. Wood
CGD, NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado, USA
Civil and Environmental Engineering, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado, USA
Martyn P. Clark
Schulich School of Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Data sets
CAMELS: Catchment Attributes and MEteorology for Large-sample Studies A. J. Newman et al. https://doi.org/10.5065/D6MW2F4D
Model code and software
CyrilThebault/FUSE-MMComparison-paper: FUSE-MMComparison-paper v1.0 (v1.0) C. Thébault https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20500212
CyrilThebault/fuse: FUSE version for multi-model comparison paper (v1.0_MMpaper) C. Thébault et al. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20500504
Short summary
Reliable river flow prediction guide water supply planning and flood protection. We tested whether selecting or combining multiple models improves accuracy compared with a single model. 78 models were used and tested in 559 river basins across the United States. A carefully chosen single model nearly matched more complex multi-model approaches, while combining models gave slightly higher accuracy and lower uncertainty. However, no approach worked best everywhere.
Reliable river flow prediction guide water supply planning and flood protection. We tested...