Articles | Volume 30, issue 8
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-2337-2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-2337-2026
Technical note
 | Highlight paper
 | 
23 Apr 2026
Technical note | Highlight paper |  | 23 Apr 2026

Technical note: High Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiencies conceal poor simulations of interannual variance in seasonal regimes

Sacha W. Ruzzante, Wouter J. M. Knoben, Thorsten Wagener, Tom Gleeson, and Markus Schnorbus

Viewed

Total article views: 836 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
522 280 34 836 119 29 20
  • HTML: 522
  • PDF: 280
  • XML: 34
  • Total: 836
  • Supplement: 119
  • BibTeX: 29
  • EndNote: 20
Views and downloads (calculated since 20 Oct 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 20 Oct 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 836 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 817 with geography defined and 19 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 23 Apr 2026
Download
Editorial statement
Are the current hydrologic models able to simulate non-stationary responses to climate change in highly seasonal climates, which include tropical, alpine, and polar regions that are some of the most vulnerable regarding climate change. This paper addresses this research question in a compelling, novel and comprehensive way, with a focus on the suitability of our performance metrics for assessing the reproduction of interannual variability.
Short summary
Common metrics used to evaluate hydrologic models make it relatively easy to achieve high performance scores in highly seasonal catchments. However, we analysed 18 hydrologic models and found that almost all were worse at simulating interannual variability and change in seasonal streamflow regimes. This suggests that climate change impacts on streamflow may not be accurately predicted in highly seasonal tropical, alpine, and polar regions, which are highly vulnerable to climate change.
Share