Articles | Volume 29, issue 18
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-4491-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-4491-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
19 Sep 2025
Research article |
| 19 Sep 2025
| 19 Sep 2025
The influence of lateral flow on land surface fluxes in southeast Australia varies with model resolution
Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Climate Extremes, UNSW Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
Climate Change Research Centre, UNSW Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
CSIRO Environment, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
Jason P. Evans
Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Climate Extremes, UNSW Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
Climate Change Research Centre, UNSW Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
Andy J. Pitman
Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Climate Extremes, UNSW Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
Climate Change Research Centre, UNSW Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
Sujan Pal
Environmental Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, Illinois, 60439, USA
David Gochis
National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado, 80301, USA
Airborne Snow Observatories, Inc., Mammoth Lakes, California, 93546, USA
Kevin Sampson
National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado, 80301, USA
Airborne Snow Observatories, Inc., Mammoth Lakes, California, 93546, USA
Related authors
No articles found.
Jon Cranko Page, Martin G. De Kauwe, Andy J. Pitman, Isaac R. Towers, Gabriele Arduini, Martin J. Best, Craig R. Ferguson, Jürgen Knauer, Hyungjun Kim, David M. Lawrence, Tomoko Nitta, Keith W. Oleson, Catherine Ottlé, Anna Ukkola, Nicholas Vuichard, Xiaoni Wang-Faivre, and Gab Abramowitz
Biogeosciences, 23, 263–282, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-23-263-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-23-263-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
This paper used a large dataset of observations, machine learning predictions, and computer model simulations to test how well land surface models represent the water, energy, and carbon cycles. We found that the models work well under "normal" weather but do not meet performance expectations during coinciding extreme conditions. Since these extremes are relatively rare, targeted model improvements could deliver major performance gains.
Rajesh Kumar Sahu, Hamza Kunhu Bangalath, Suleiman Mostamandi, Jason Evans, Paul A. Kucera, and Hylke E. Beck
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 21–40, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-26-21-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-26-21-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
This study tests 36 combinations of microphysics and boundary layer schemes in the Weather Research and Forecasting model for extreme rainfall over Saudi Arabia. Using the Kling–Gupta Efficiency, the Yonsei University boundary layer with the Thompson microphysics performs best; the Morrison microphysics with the Mellor–Yamada–Nakanishi–Niino boundary layer ranks lowest. Mean temporal efficiency is 0.37, spatial efficiency is 0.26, revealing spatial prediction challenges in arid regions.
Youngil Kim and Jason Evans
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6411, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6411, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Short summary
Climate models used to study future climate often contain systematic errors that affect high-resolution simulations. This study presents a new open-source tool that reduces these errors before regional climate simulations are run. By correcting multiple atmospheric variables together and at short time scales, the method improves realism and consistency in simulated climate patterns. This leads to more reliable regional projections, particularly for extreme weather events.
Lingfei Wang, Gab Abramowitz, Ying-Ping Wang, Andy Pitman, Philippe Ciais, and Daniel S. Goll
Biogeosciences, 22, 7845–7863, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-7845-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-7845-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Accurate estimates of global soil organic carbon (SOC) content and its spatial pattern are critical for future climate change mitigation. However, the most advanced process-based SOC models struggle to do this task. Here we apply multiple explainable machine learning methods to identify missing variables and misrepresented relationships between environmental factors and SOC in these models, offering new insights to guide model development for more reliable SOC predictions.
Matthew O. Grant, Anna M. Ukkola, Elisabeth Vogel, Sanaa Hobeichi, Andy J. Pitman, Alex Raymond Borowiak, and Keirnan Fowler
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 5555–5573, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-5555-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-5555-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Australia is regularly subjected to severe and widespread drought. By using multiple drought indicators, we show that although there have been widespread decreases in droughts since the beginning of the 20th century, many regions have seen an increase in droughts in more recent decades. Despite these changes, our analysis shows that they remain within the range of observed variability and are not unprecedented in the context of past droughts.
Anna-Maria Virkkala, Isabel Wargowsky, Judith Vogt, McKenzie A. Kuhn, Simran Madaan, Richard O'Keefe, Tiffany Windholz, Kyle A. Arndt, Brendan M. Rogers, Jennifer D. Watts, Kelcy Kent, Mathias Göckede, David Olefeldt, Gerard Rocher-Ros, Edward A. G. Schuur, David Bastviken, Kristoffer Aalstad, Kelly Aho, Joonatan Ala-Könni, Haley Alcock, Inge Althuizen, Christopher D. Arp, Jun Asanuma, Katrin Attermeyer, Mika Aurela, Sivakiruthika Balathandayuthabani, Alan Barr, Maialen Barret, Ochirbat Batkhishig, Christina Biasi, Mats P. Björkman, Andrew Black, Elena Blanc-Betes, Pascal Bodmer, Julia Boike, Abdullah Bolek, Frédéric Bouchard, Ingeborg Bussmann, Lea Cabrol, Eleonora Canfora, Sean Carey, Karel Castro-Morales, Namyi Chae, Andres Christen, Torben R. Christensen, Casper T. Christiansen, Housen Chu, Graham Clark, Francois Clayer, Patrick Crill, Christopher Cunada, Scott J. Davidson, Joshua F. Dean, Sigrid Dengel, Matteo Detto, Catherine Dieleman, Florent Domine, Egor Dyukarev, Colin Edgar, Bo Elberling, Craig A. Emmerton, Eugenie Euskirchen, Grant Falvo, Thomas Friborg, Michelle Garneau, Mariasilvia Giamberini, Mikhail V. Glagolev, Miquel A. Gonzalez-Meler, Gustaf Granath, Jón Guðmundsson, Konsta Happonen, Yoshinobu Harazono, Lorna Harris, Josh Hashemi, Nicholas Hasson, Janna Heerah, Liam Heffernan, Manuel Helbig, Warren Helgason, Michal Heliasz, Greg Henry, Geert Hensgens, Tetsuya Hiyama, Macall Hock, David Holl, Beth Holmes, Jutta Holst, Thomas Holst, Gabriel Hould-Gosselin, Elyn Humphreys, Jacqueline Hung, Jussi Huotari, Hiroki Ikawa, Danil V. Ilyasov, Mamoru Ishikawa, Go Iwahana, Hiroki Iwata, Marcin Antoni Jackowicz-Korczynski, Joachim Jansen, Järvi Järveoja, Vincent E. J. Jassey, Rasmus Jensen, Katharina Jentzsch, Robert G. Jespersen, Carl-Fredrik Johannesson, Chersity P. Jones, Anders Jonsson, Ji Young Jung, Sari Juutinen, Evan Kane, Jan Karlsson, Sergey Karsanaev, Kuno Kasak, Julia Kelly, Kasha Kempton, Marcus Klaus, George W. Kling, Natacha Kljun, Jacqueline Knutson, Hideki Kobayashi, John Kochendorfer, Kukka-Maaria Kohonen, Pasi Kolari, Mika Korkiakoski, Aino Korrensalo, Pirkko Kortelainen, Egle Koster, Kajar Koster, Ayumi Kotani, Praveena Krishnan, Juliya Kurbatova, Lars Kutzbach, Min Jung Kwon, Ethan D. Kyzivat, Jessica Lagroix, Theodore Langhorst, Elena Lapshina, Tuula Larmola, Klaus S. Larsen, Isabelle Laurion, Justin Ledman, Hanna Lee, A. Joshua Leffler, Lance Lesack, Anders Lindroth, David Lipson, Annalea Lohila, Efrén López-Blanco, Vincent L. St. Louis, Erik Lundin, Misha Luoto, Takashi Machimura, Marta Magnani, Avni Malhotra, Marja Maljanen, Ivan Mammarella, Elisa Männistö, Luca Belelli Marchesini, Phil Marsh, Pertti J. Martkainen, Maija E. Marushchak, Mikhail Mastepanov, Alex Mavrovic, Trofim Maximov, Christina Minions, Marco Montemayor, Tomoaki Morishita, Patrick Murphy, Daniel F. Nadeau, Erin Nicholls, Mats B. Nilsson, Anastasia Niyazova, Jenni Nordén, Koffi Dodji Noumonvi, Hannu Nykanen, Walter Oechel, Anne Ojala, Tomohiro Okadera, Sujan Pal, Alexey V. Panov, Tim Papakyriakou, Dario Papale, Sang-Jong Park, Frans-Jan W. Parmentier, Gilberto Pastorello, Mike Peacock, Matthias Peichl, Roman Petrov, Kyra St. Pierre, Norbert Pirk, Jessica Plein, Vilmantas Preskienis, Anatoly Prokushkin, Jukka Pumpanen, Hilary A. Rains, Niklas Rakos, Aleski Räsänen, Helena Rautakoski, Riika Rinnan, Janne Rinne, Adrian Rocha, Nigel Roulet, Alexandre Roy, Anna Rutgersson, Aleksandr F. Sabrekov, Torsten Sachs, Erik Sahlée, Alejandro Salazar, Henrique Oliveira Sawakuchi, Christopher Schulze, Roger Seco, Armando Sepulveda-Jauregui, Svetlana Serikova, Abbey Serrone, Hanna M. Silvennoinen, Sofie Sjogersten, June Skeeter, Jo Snöälv, Sebastian Sobek, Oliver Sonnentag, Emily H. Stanley, Maria Strack, Lena Strom, Patrick Sullivan, Ryan Sullivan, Anna Sytiuk, Torbern Tagesson, Pierre Taillardat, Julie Talbot, Suzanne E. Tank, Mario Tenuta, Irina Terenteva, Frederic Thalasso, Antoine Thiboult, Halldor Thorgeirsson, Fenix Garcia Tigreros, Margaret Torn, Amy Townsend-Small, Claire Treat, Alain Tremblay, Carlo Trotta, Eeva-Stiina Tuittila, Merritt Turetsky, Masahito Ueyama, Muhammad Umair, Aki Vähä, Lona van Delden, Maarten van Hardenbroek, Andrej Varlagin, Ruth K. Varner, Elena Veretennikova, Timo Vesala, Tarmo Virtanen, Carolina Voigt, Jorien E. Vonk, Robert Wagner, Katey Walter Anthony, Qinxue Wang, Masataka Watanabe, Hailey Webb, Jeffrey M. Welker, Andreas Westergaard-Nielsen, Sebastian Westermann, Jeffrey R. White, Christian Wille, Scott N. Williamson, Scott Zolkos, Donatella Zona, and Susan M. Natali
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-585, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-585, 2025
Preprint under review for ESSD
Short summary
Short summary
This dataset includes monthly measurements of carbon dioxide and methane exchange between land, water, and the atmosphere from over 1,000 sites in Arctic and boreal regions. It combines measurements from a variety of ecosystems, including wetlands, forests, tundra, lakes, and rivers, gathered by over 260 researchers from 1984–2024. This dataset can be used to improve and reduce uncertainty in carbon budgets in order to strengthen our understanding of climate feedbacks in a warming world.
Ryan C. Sullivan, David P. Billesbach, Sebastien Biraud, Stephen Chan, Richard Hart, Evan Keeler, Jenni Kyrouac, Sujan Pal, Mikhail Pekour, Sara L. Sullivan, Adam Theisen, Matt Tuftedal, and David R. Cook
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 5007–5038, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-5007-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-5007-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Turbulent fluxes quantify the exchange of energy, water, or trace gases into and out of the atmosphere. The U.S. Department of Energy Atmospheric Radiation Measurement user facility has been making atmospheric measurements since the early 1990s, including measurements of turbulent fluxes using two well-established methods: the energy balance Bowen ratio and eddy covariance. This paper documents key aspects of these datasets, including their history, changes through time, and best use practices.
Yinglin Mu, Jason Evans, Andrea Taschetto, and Chiara Holgate
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2833, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2833, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Lagrangian approaches have been increasingly employed due to their suitability for extreme events and climatological studies in finding moisture sources of precipitation. However, as these approaches track independent air parcels carrying moisture—rather than simulate processes based on governing physical equations—they rely on several underlying assumptions. This study tests these assumptions and refines the approaches to enhance their broader applicability.
Rajesh Kumar, Piyush Bhardwaj, Cenlin He, Jennifer Boehnert, Forrest Lacey, Stefano Alessandrini, Kevin Sampson, Matthew Casali, Scott Swerdlin, Olga Wilhelmi, Gabriele G. Pfister, Benjamin Gaubert, and Helen Worden
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 1807–1834, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-1807-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-1807-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We have created a 14-year hourly air quality dataset at 12 km resolution by combining satellite observations of atmospheric composition with air quality models over the contiguous United States (CONUS). The dataset has been found to reproduce key observed features of air quality over the CONUS. To enable easy visualization and interpretation of county-level air quality measures and trends by stakeholders, an ArcGIS air quality dashboard has also been developed.
Giovanni Di Virgilio, Fei Ji, Eugene Tam, Jason P. Evans, Jatin Kala, Julia Andrys, Christopher Thomas, Dipayan Choudhury, Carlos Rocha, Yue Li, and Matthew L. Riley
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 703–724, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-703-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-703-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We evaluate the skill in simulating the Australian climate of some of the latest generation of regional climate models. We show when and where the models simulate this climate with high skill versus model limitations. We show how new models perform relative to the previous-generation models, assessing how model design features may underlie key performance improvements. This work is of national and international relevance as it can help guide the use and interpretation of climate projections.
Giovanni Di Virgilio, Jason P. Evans, Fei Ji, Eugene Tam, Jatin Kala, Julia Andrys, Christopher Thomas, Dipayan Choudhury, Carlos Rocha, Stephen White, Yue Li, Moutassem El Rafei, Rishav Goyal, Matthew L. Riley, and Jyothi Lingala
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 671–702, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-671-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-671-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We introduce new climate models that simulate Australia’s future climate at regional scales, including at an unprecedented resolution of 4 km for 1950–2100. We describe the model design process used to create these new climate models. We show how the new models perform relative to previous-generation models and compare their climate projections. This work is of national and international relevance as it can help guide climate model design and the use and interpretation of climate projections.
Arezoo Rafieeinasab, Amir Mazrooei, Thomas Enzminger, Ishita Srivastava, Aubrey Dugger, David Gochis, Nina Omani, Joe Grim, Kevin Sampson, Yongxin Zhang, Jacob LaFontaine, Roland Viger, Yuqiong Liu, and Tim Schneider
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-262, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-262, 2024
Manuscript not accepted for further review
Short summary
Short summary
Integrated Water Availability Assessments is a national initiative to characterize water availability in the U.S. The WRF-Hydro model is used to generate an estimate of hydrological fluxes and storage across the conterminous United States. The streamflow performance is reasonable especially in the eastern and western U.S. Model performance in estimating snow, evapotranspiration and soil moisture is also reasonable with some differences against the verification datasets in certain areas.
Lingfei Wang, Gab Abramowitz, Ying-Ping Wang, Andy Pitman, and Raphael A. Viscarra Rossel
SOIL, 10, 619–636, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-10-619-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-10-619-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Effective management of soil organic carbon (SOC) requires accurate knowledge of its distribution and factors influencing its dynamics. We identify the importance of variables in spatial SOC variation and estimate SOC stocks in Australia using various models. We find there are significant disparities in SOC estimates when different models are used, highlighting the need for a critical re-evaluation of land management strategies that rely on the SOC distribution derived from a single approach.
Conrad Wasko, Seth Westra, Rory Nathan, Acacia Pepler, Timothy H. Raupach, Andrew Dowdy, Fiona Johnson, Michelle Ho, Kathleen L. McInnes, Doerte Jakob, Jason Evans, Gabriele Villarini, and Hayley J. Fowler
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1251–1285, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1251-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1251-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
In response to flood risk, design flood estimation is a cornerstone of infrastructure design and emergency response planning, but design flood estimation guidance under climate change is still in its infancy. We perform the first published systematic review of the impact of climate change on design flood estimation and conduct a meta-analysis to provide quantitative estimates of possible future changes in extreme rainfall.
Baptiste Vandecrux, Jason E. Box, Andreas P. Ahlstrøm, Signe B. Andersen, Nicolas Bayou, William T. Colgan, Nicolas J. Cullen, Robert S. Fausto, Dominik Haas-Artho, Achim Heilig, Derek A. Houtz, Penelope How, Ionut Iosifescu Enescu, Nanna B. Karlsson, Rebecca Kurup Buchholz, Kenneth D. Mankoff, Daniel McGrath, Noah P. Molotch, Bianca Perren, Maiken K. Revheim, Anja Rutishauser, Kevin Sampson, Martin Schneebeli, Sandy Starkweather, Simon Steffen, Jeff Weber, Patrick J. Wright, Henry Jay Zwally, and Konrad Steffen
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 5467–5489, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-5467-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-5467-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The Greenland Climate Network (GC-Net) comprises stations that have been monitoring the weather on the Greenland Ice Sheet for over 30 years. These stations are being replaced by newer ones maintained by the Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland (GEUS). The historical data were reprocessed to improve their quality, and key information about the weather stations has been compiled. This augmented dataset is available at https://doi.org/10.22008/FK2/VVXGUT (Steffen et al., 2022).
Lina Teckentrup, Martin G. De Kauwe, Gab Abramowitz, Andrew J. Pitman, Anna M. Ukkola, Sanaa Hobeichi, Bastien François, and Benjamin Smith
Earth Syst. Dynam., 14, 549–576, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-549-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-549-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Studies analyzing the impact of the future climate on ecosystems employ climate projections simulated by global circulation models. These climate projections display biases that translate into significant uncertainty in projections of the future carbon cycle. Here, we test different methods to constrain the uncertainty in simulations of the carbon cycle over Australia. We find that all methods reduce the bias in the steady-state carbon variables but that temporal properties do not improve.
Jon Cranko Page, Martin G. De Kauwe, Gab Abramowitz, Jamie Cleverly, Nina Hinko-Najera, Mark J. Hovenden, Yao Liu, Andy J. Pitman, and Kiona Ogle
Biogeosciences, 19, 1913–1932, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-1913-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-1913-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Although vegetation responds to climate at a wide range of timescales, models of the land carbon sink often ignore responses that do not occur instantly. In this study, we explore the timescales at which Australian ecosystems respond to climate. We identified that carbon and water fluxes can be modelled more accurately if we include environmental drivers from up to a year in the past. The importance of antecedent conditions is related to ecosystem aridity but is also influenced by other factors.
Sami W. Rifai, Martin G. De Kauwe, Anna M. Ukkola, Lucas A. Cernusak, Patrick Meir, Belinda E. Medlyn, and Andy J. Pitman
Biogeosciences, 19, 491–515, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-491-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-491-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Australia's woody ecosystems have experienced widespread greening despite a warming climate and repeated record-breaking droughts and heat waves. Increasing atmospheric CO2 increases plant water use efficiency, yet quantifying the CO2 effect is complicated due to co-occurring effects of global change. Here we harmonized a 38-year satellite record to separate the effects of climate change, land use change, and disturbance to quantify the CO2 fertilization effect on the greening phenomenon.
Lina Teckentrup, Martin G. De Kauwe, Andrew J. Pitman, Daniel S. Goll, Vanessa Haverd, Atul K. Jain, Emilie Joetzjer, Etsushi Kato, Sebastian Lienert, Danica Lombardozzi, Patrick C. McGuire, Joe R. Melton, Julia E. M. S. Nabel, Julia Pongratz, Stephen Sitch, Anthony P. Walker, and Sönke Zaehle
Biogeosciences, 18, 5639–5668, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-5639-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-5639-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The Australian continent is included in global assessments of the carbon cycle such as the global carbon budget, yet the performance of dynamic global vegetation models (DGVMs) over Australia has rarely been evaluated. We assessed simulations by an ensemble of dynamic global vegetation models over Australia and highlighted a number of key areas that lead to model divergence on both short (inter-annual) and long (decadal) timescales.
Mengyuan Mu, Martin G. De Kauwe, Anna M. Ukkola, Andy J. Pitman, Weidong Guo, Sanaa Hobeichi, and Peter R. Briggs
Earth Syst. Dynam., 12, 919–938, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-919-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-919-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Groundwater can buffer the impacts of drought and heatwaves on ecosystems, which is often neglected in model studies. Using a land surface model with groundwater, we explained how groundwater sustains transpiration and eases heat pressure on plants in heatwaves during multi-year droughts. Our results showed the groundwater’s influences diminish as drought extends and are regulated by plant physiology. We suggest neglecting groundwater in models may overstate projected future heatwave intensity.
Sanaa Hobeichi, Gab Abramowitz, and Jason P. Evans
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 3855–3874, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-3855-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-3855-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Evapotranspiration (ET) links the water, energy and carbon cycle on land. Reliable ET estimates are key to understand droughts and flooding. We develop a new ET dataset, DOLCE V3, by merging multiple global ET datasets, and we show that it matches ET observations better and hence is more reliable than its parent datasets. Next, we use DOLCE V3 to examine recent changes in ET and find that ET has increased over most of the land, decreased in some regions, and has not changed in some other regions
Max Kulinich, Yanan Fan, Spiridon Penev, Jason P. Evans, and Roman Olson
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 3539–3551, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3539-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3539-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We present a novel stochastic approach based on Markov chains to estimate climate model weights of multi-model ensemble means. This approach showed improved performance (better correlation with observations) over existing alternatives during cross-validation and model-as-truth tests. The results of this comparative analysis should serve to motivate further studies in applications of Markov chain and other nonlinear methods to find optimal model weights for constructing ensemble means.
Lina Teckentrup, Martin G. De Kauwe, Andrew J. Pitman, and Benjamin Smith
Biogeosciences, 18, 2181–2203, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-2181-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-2181-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) describes changes in the sea surface temperature patterns of the Pacific Ocean. This influences the global weather, impacting vegetation on land. There are two types of El Niño: central Pacific (CP) and eastern Pacific (EP). In this study, we explored the long-term impacts on the carbon balance on land linked to the two El Niño types. Using a dynamic vegetation model, we simulated what would happen if only either CP or EP El Niño events had occurred.
Mengyuan Mu, Martin G. De Kauwe, Anna M. Ukkola, Andy J. Pitman, Teresa E. Gimeno, Belinda E. Medlyn, Dani Or, Jinyan Yang, and David S. Ellsworth
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 447–471, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-447-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-447-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Land surface model (LSM) is a critical tool to study land responses to droughts and heatwaves, but lacking comprehensive observations limited past model evaluations. Here we use a novel dataset at a water-limited site, evaluate a typical LSM with a range of competing model hypotheses widely used in LSMs and identify marked uncertainty due to the differing process assumptions. We show the extensive observations constrain model processes and allow better simulated land responses to these extremes.
Cited articles
Alexander, G. A., Voter, C. B., Wright, D. B., and Loheide II, S. P.: Urban Ecohydrology: Accounting for Sub-Grid Lateral Water and Energy Transfers in a Land Surface Model, Water Resour. Res., 60, e2023WR035511, https://doi.org/10.1029/2023WR035511, 2024.
Arnault, J., Fersch, B., Rummler, T., Zhang, Z., Quenum, G. M., Wei, J., Graf, M., Laux, P., and Kunstmann, H.: Lateral terrestrial water flow contribution to summer precipitation at continental scale – A comparison between Europe and West Africa with WRF-Hydro-tag ensembles, Hydrol. Process., 35, e14183, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14183, 2021.
Barlage, M., Tewari, M., Chen, F., Miguez-Macho, G., Yang, Z.-L., and Niu, G.-Y.: The effect of groundwater interaction in North American regional climate simulations with WRF/Noah-MP, Climatic Change, 129, 485–498, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1308-8, 2015.
Bhanja, S. N., Coon, E. T., Lu, D., and Painter, S. L.: Evaluation of distributed process-based hydrologic model performance using only a priori information to define model inputs, J. Hydrol., 618, 129176, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129176, 2023.
Bisht, G., Riley, W. J., Hammond, G. E., and Lorenzetti, D. M.: Development and evaluation of a variably saturated flow model in the global E3SM Land Model (ELM) version 1.0, Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 4085–4102, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4085-2018, 2018.
Blyth, E. M., Arora, V. K., Clark, D. B., Dadson, S. J., De Kauwe, M. G., Lawrence, D. M., Melton, J. R., Pongratz, J., Turton, R. H., Yoshimura, K., and Yuan, H.: Advances in Land Surface Modelling, Curr. Clim. Change Rep., 7, 45–71, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-021-00171-5, 2021.
Brunner, P. and Simmons, C. T.: HydroGeoSphere: A Fully Integrated, Physically Based Hydrological Model, Groundwater, 50, 170–176, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.2011.00882.x, 2012.
Chaney, N. W., Torres-Rojas, L., Vergopolan, N., and Fisher, C. K.: HydroBlocks v0.2: enabling a field-scale two-way coupling between the land surface and river networks in Earth system models, Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 6813–6832, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6813-2021, 2021.
Chen, T., McVicar, T. R., Wang, G., Chen, X., De Jeu, R. A. M., Liu, Y. Y., Shen, H., Zhang, F., and Dolman, A. J.: Advantages of Using Microwave Satellite Soil Moisture over Gridded Precipitation Products and Land Surface Model Output in Assessing Regional Vegetation Water Availability and Growth Dynamics for a Lateral Inflow Receiving Landscape, Remote Sens., 8, 428, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8050428, 2016.
Clark, M. P., Fan, Y., Lawrence, D. M., Adam, J. C., Bolster, D., Gochis, D. J., Hooper, R. P., Kumar, M., Leung, L. R., Mackay, D. S., Maxwell, R. M., Shen, C., Swenson, S. C., and Zeng, X.: Improving the representation of hydrologic processes in Earth System Models, Water Resour. Res., 51, 5929–5956, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017096, 2015.
Cosgrove, B., Gochis, D., Flowers, T., Dugger, A., Ogden, F., Graziano, T., Clark, E., Cabell, R., Casiday, N., Cui, Z., Eicher, K., Fall, G., Feng, X., Fitzgerald, K., Frazier, N., George, C., Gibbs, R., Hernandez, L., Johnson, D., Jones, R., Karsten, L., Kefelegn, H., Kitzmiller, D., Lee, H., Liu, Y., Mashriqui, H., Mattern, D., McCluskey, A., McCreight, J. L., McDaniel, R., Midekisa, A., Newman, A., Pan, L., Pham, C., RafieeiNasab, A., Rasmussen, R., Read, L., Rezaeianzadeh, M., Salas, F., Sang, D., Sampson, K., Schneider, T., Shi, Q., Sood, G., Wood, A., Wu, W., Yates, D., Yu, W., and Zhang, Y.: NOAA's National Water Model: Advancing operational hydrology through continental-scale modeling, JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 60, 247–272, https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13184, 2024.
Curasi, S. R., Melton, J. R., Humphreys, E. R., Hermosilla, T., and Wulder, M. A.: Implementing a dynamic representation of fire and harvest including subgrid-scale heterogeneity in the tile-based land surface model CLASSIC v1.45, Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2683–2704, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2683-2024, 2024.
Demory, M.-E., Berthou, S., Fernández, J., Sørland, S. L., Brogli, R., Roberts, M. J., Beyerle, U., Seddon, J., Haarsma, R., Schär, C., Buonomo, E., Christensen, O. B., Ciarlo ̀, J. M., Fealy, R., Nikulin, G., Peano, D., Putrasahan, D., Roberts, C. D., Senan, R., Steger, C., Teichmann, C., and Vautard, R.: European daily precipitation according to EURO-CORDEX regional climate models (RCMs) and high-resolution global climate models (GCMs) from the High-Resolution Model Intercomparison Project (HighResMIP), Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 5485–5506, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5485-2020, 2020.
Devanand, A.: WRF-Hydro simulations used to study the impact of lateral flow in southeast Australia, Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13836371, 2025a.
Devanand, A.: anjanadevanand/LSM_lateral_flow_SEAus: LSM_lateral_flow_SEAus (v.1.0.0), Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17118204, 2025.
Doherty, J.: PEST: Model Independent Parameter Estimation, Watermark Numerical Computing, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, https://pesthomepage.org (last access: 27 February 2023), 2016.
Dutta, D., Vaze, J., Kim, S., Hughes, J., Yang, A., Teng, J., and Lerat, J.: Development and application of a large scale river system model for National Water Accounting in Australia, J. Hydrol., 547, 124–142, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.01.040, 2017.
Duveiller, G., Hooker, J., and Cescatti, A.: The mark of vegetation change on Earth's surface energy balance, Nat. Commun., 9, 679, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-02810-8, 2018.
Evans, J. P. and Zaitchik, B. F.: Modeling the large-scale water balance impact of different irrigation systems, Water Resour. Res., 44, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR006671, 2008.
Fan, Y., Clark, M., Lawrence, D. M., Swenson, S., Band, L. E., Brantley, S. L., Brooks, P. D., Dietrich, W. E., Flores, A., Grant, G., Kirchner, J. W., Mackay, D. S., McDonnell, J. J., Milly, P. C. D., Sullivan, P. L., Tague, C., Ajami, H., Chaney, N., Hartmann, A., Hazenberg, P., McNamara, J., Pelletier, J., Perket, J., Rouholahnejad-Freund, E., Wagener, T., Zeng, X., Beighley, E., Buzan, J., Huang, M., Livneh, B., Mohanty, B. P., Nijssen, B., Safeeq, M., Shen, C., van Verseveld, W., Volk, J., and Yamazaki, D.: Hillslope Hydrology in Global Change Research and Earth System Modeling, Water Resour. Res., 55, 1737–1772, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR023903, 2019.
Felfelani, F., Lawrence, D. M., and Pokhrel, Y.: Representing Intercell Lateral Groundwater Flow and Aquifer Pumping in the Community Land Model, Water Resour. Res., 57, e2020WR027531, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR027531, 2021.
Fersch, B., Senatore, A., Adler, B., Arnault, J., Mauder, M., Schneider, K., Völksch, I., and Kunstmann, H.: High-resolution fully coupled atmospheric–hydrological modeling: a cross-compartment regional water and energy cycle evaluation, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 2457–2481, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-2457-2020, 2020.
Fisher, R. A., Koven, C. D., Anderegg, W. R. L., Christoffersen, B. O., Dietze, M. C., Farrior, C. E., Holm, J. A., Hurtt, G. C., Knox, R. G., Lawrence, P. J., Lichstein, J. W., Longo, M., Matheny, A. M., Medvigy, D., Muller-Landau, H. C., Powell, T. L., Serbin, S. P., Sato, H., Shuman, J. K., Smith, B., Trugman, A. T., Viskari, T., Verbeeck, H., Weng, E., Xu, C., Xu, X., Zhang, T., and Moorcroft, P. R.: Vegetation demographics in Earth System Models: A review of progress and priorities, Global Change Biology, 24, 35–54, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13910, 2018.
Forzieri, G., Miralles, D. G., Ciais, P., Alkama, R., Ryu, Y., Duveiller, G., Zhang, K., Robertson, E., Kautz, M., Martens, B., Jiang, C., Arneth, A., Georgievski, G., Li, W., Ceccherini, G., Anthoni, P., Lawrence, P., Wiltshire, A., Pongratz, J., Piao, S., Sitch, S., Goll, D. S., Arora, V. K., Lienert, S., Lombardozzi, D., Kato, E., Nabel, J. E. M. S., Tian, H., Friedlingstein, P., and Cescatti, A.: Increased control of vegetation on global terrestrial energy fluxes, Nat. Clim. Chang., 10, 356–362, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-0717-0, 2020.
Fowler, K., Peel, M., Saft, M., Peterson, T. J., Western, A., Band, L., Petheram, C., Dharmadi, S., Tan, K. S., Zhang, L., Lane, P., Kiem, A., Marshall, L., Griebel, A., Medlyn, B. E., Ryu, D., Bonotto, G., Wasko, C., Ukkola, A., Stephens, C., Frost, A., Gardiya Weligamage, H., Saco, P., Zheng, H., Chiew, F., Daly, E., Walker, G., Vervoort, R. W., Hughes, J., Trotter, L., Neal, B., Cartwright, I., and Nathan, R.: Explaining changes in rainfall–runoff relationships during and after Australia's Millennium Drought: a community perspective, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 6073–6120, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-6073-2022, 2022.
Gardiya Weligamage, H., Fowler, K., Peterson, T. J., Saft, M., Peel, M. C., and Ryu, D.: Partitioning of Precipitation Into Terrestrial Water Balance Components Under a Drying Climate, Water Resour. Res., 59, e2022WR033538, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022WR033538, 2023.
Gochis, D. and Chen, F.: Hydrological Enhancements to the Community Noah Land Surface Model, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research, https://opensky.ucar.edu/system/files/2024-08/technotes_373.pdf (last access: 15 September 2025), 2003.
Gochis, D. J., Vivoni, E. R., and Watts, C. J.: The impact of soil depth on land surface energy and water fluxes in the North American Monsoon region, Journal of Arid Environments, 74, 564–571, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2009.11.002, 2010.
Gochis, D. J., Barlage, M., Cabell, R., Casali, M., Dugger, A., FitzGerald, K., McAllister, M., McCreight, J., RafieeiNasab, A., Read, L., Sampson, K., Yates, D., and Zhang, Y.: The WRF-Hydro modeling system technical description, (Version 5.1.1), https://ral.ucar.edu/sites/default/files/public/WRFHydroV511TechnicalDescription.pdf (last access: 15 September 2025), 2020.
Grose, M. R., Narsey, S., Trancoso, R., Mackallah, C., Delage, F., Dowdy, A., Di Virgilio, G., Watterson, I., Dobrohotoff, P., Rashid, H. A., Rauniyar, S., Henley, B., Thatcher, M., Syktus, J., Abramowitz, G., Evans, J. P., Su, C.-H., and Takbash, A.: A CMIP6-based multi-model downscaling ensemble to underpin climate change services in Australia, Climate Services, 30, 100368, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cliser.2023.100368, 2023.
Guerschman, J. P., McVicar, T. R., Vleeshower, J., Van Niel, T. G., Peña-Arancibia, J. L., and Chen, Y.: Estimating actual evapotranspiration at field-to-continent scales by calibrating the CMRSET algorithm with MODIS, VIIRS, Landsat and Sentinel-2 data, J. Hydrol., 605, 127318, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.127318, 2022.
Hazenberg, P., Broxton, P., Gochis, D., Niu, G.-Y., Pangle, L. A., Pelletier, J. D., Troch, P. A., and Zeng, X.: Testing the hybrid-3-D hillslope hydrological model in a controlled environment, Water Resour. Res., 52, 1089–1107, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR018106, 2016.
Hobeichi, S., Abramowitz, G., and Evans, J. P.: Robust historical evapotranspiration trends across climate regimes, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 3855–3874, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-3855-2021, 2021.
Jones, D. A., Wang, W., and Fawcett, R.: High-quality spatial climate data-sets for Australia, Australian Meteorological and Oceanographic Journal, 58, 233–248, https://doi.org/10.22499/2.5804.003, 2009.
Jordan, R.: A one-dimensional temperature model for a snow cover, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Cold Regions Research & Engineering Laboratory, Hanover, New Hampshire, https://hdl.handle.net/11681/11677 (last access: 15 September 2025), 1991.
Keune, J., Gasper, F., Goergen, K., Hense, A., Shrestha, P., Sulis, M., and Kollet, S.: Studying the influence of groundwater representations on land surface-atmosphere feedbacks during the European heat wave in 2003, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 13301–13325, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025426, 2016.
Kishné, A. Sz., Yimam, Y. T., Morgan, C. L. S., and Dornblaser, B. C.: Evaluation and improvement of the default soil hydraulic parameters for the Noah Land Surface Model, Geoderma, 285, 247–259, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.09.022, 2017.
Lahmers, T. M., Castro, C. L., and Hazenberg, P.: Effects of Lateral Flow on the Convective Environment in a Coupled Hydrometeorological Modeling System in a Semiarid Environment, J. Hydrometeorol., 21, 615–642, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-19-0100.1, 2020.
Lahmers, T. M., Hazenberg, P., Gupta, H., Castro, C., Gochis, D., Dugger, A., Yates, D., Read, L., Karsten, L., and Wang, Y.-H.: Evaluation of NOAA National Water Model Parameter Calibration in Semiarid Environments Prone to Channel Infiltration, J. Hydrometeorol., 22, 2939–2969, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-20-0198.1, 2021.
Lawrence, D. M., Fisher, R. A., Koven, C. D., Oleson, K. W., Swenson, S. C., Bonan, G., Collier, N., Ghimire, B., van Kampenhout, L., Kennedy, D., Kluzek, E., Lawrence, P. J., Li, F., Li, H., Lombardozzi, D., Riley, W. J., Sacks, W. J., Shi, M., Vertenstein, M., Wieder, W. R., Xu, C., Ali, A. A., Badger, A. M., Bisht, G., van den Broeke, M., Brunke, M. A., Burns, S. P., Buzan, J., Clark, M., Craig, A., Dahlin, K., Drewniak, B., Fisher, J. B., Flanner, M., Fox, A. M., Gentine, P., Hoffman, F., Keppel-Aleks, G., Knox, R., Kumar, S., Lenaerts, J., Leung, L. R., Lipscomb, W. H., Lu, Y., Pandey, A., Pelletier, J. D., Perket, J., Randerson, J. T., Ricciuto, D. M., Sanderson, B. M., Slater, A., Subin, Z. M., Tang, J., Thomas, R. Q., Val Martin, M., and Zeng, X.: The Community Land Model Version 5: Description of New Features, Benchmarking, and Impact of Forcing Uncertainty, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 11, 4245–4287, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001583, 2019.
Lehner, B., Verdin, K., and Jarvis, A.: New Global Hydrography Derived From Spaceborne Elevation Data, Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 89, 93–94, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008EO100001, 2008.
Li, H., Wigmosta, M. S., Wu, H., Huang, M., Ke, Y., Coleman, A. M., and Leung, L. R.: A Physically Based Runoff Routing Model for Land Surface and Earth System Models, J. Hydrometeorol., 14, 808–828, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-12-015.1, 2013.
Lucas-Picher, P., Argüeso, D., Brisson, E., Tramblay, Y., Berg, P., Lemonsu, A., Kotlarski, S., and Caillaud, C.: Convection-permitting modeling with regional climate models: Latest developments and next steps, WIREs Climate Change, 12, e731, https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.731, 2021.
Lymburner, L., Tan, P., Mueller, N., Thackway, R., Lewis, A., Thankappan, M., Randall, L., Islam, A., and Senarath, U.: The Dynamic Land Cover Datset, Geoscience Australia, Canberra, https://pid.geoscience.gov.au/dataset/ga/71069 (last access: 9 January 2023), 2011.
Mastrotheodoros, T., Pappas, C., Molnar, P., Burlando, P., Manoli, G., Parajka, J., Rigon, R., Szeles, B., Bottazzi, M., Hadjidoukas, P., and Fatichi, S.: More green and less blue water in the Alps during warmer summers, Nat. Clim. Chang., 10, 155–161, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0676-5, 2020.
Maxwell, R. M. and Condon, L. E.: Connections between groundwater flow and transpiration partitioning, Science, 353, 377–380, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf7891, 2016.
McVicar, T., Vleeshouwer, J., Van Niel, T., and Guerschman, J.: Actual Evapotranspiration for Australia using CMRSET algorithm, Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network [data set], https://doi.org/10.25901/gg27-ck96, 2022.
Muñoz-Sabater, J., Dutra, E., Agustí-Panareda, A., Albergel, C., Arduini, G., Balsamo, G., Boussetta, S., Choulga, M., Harrigan, S., Hersbach, H., Martens, B., Miralles, D. G., Piles, M., Rodríguez-Fernández, N. J., Zsoter, E., Buontempo, C., and Thépaut, J.-N.: ERA5-Land: a state-of-the-art global reanalysis dataset for land applications, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 4349–4383, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-4349-2021, 2021.
Naz, B. S., Sharples, W., Ma, Y., Goergen, K., and Kollet, S.: Continental-scale evaluation of a fully distributed coupled land surface and groundwater model, ParFlow-CLM (v3.6.0), over Europe, Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1617–1639, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1617-2023, 2023.
Niu, G.-Y. and Yang, Z.-L.: Effects of Frozen Soil on Snowmelt Runoff and Soil Water Storage at a Continental Scale, Journal of Hydrometeorology, 7, 937–952, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM538.1, 2006.
Norton, A. J., Rayner, P. J., Wang, Y.-P., Parazoo, N. C., Baskaran, L., Briggs, P. R., Haverd, V., and Doughty, R.: Hydrologic connectivity drives extremes and high variability in vegetation productivity across Australian arid and semi-arid ecosystems, Remote Sens. Environ., 272, 112937, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2022.112937, 2022.
O'Neill, M. M. F., Tijerina, D. T., Condon, L. E., and Maxwell, R. M.: Assessment of the ParFlow–CLM CONUS 1.0 integrated hydrologic model: evaluation of hyper-resolution water balance components across the contiguous United States, Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 7223–7254, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7223-2021, 2021.
Pal, S., Wang, J., Feinstein, J., Yan, E., and Kotamarthi, V. R.: Projected changes in extreme streamflow and inland flooding in the mid-21st century over Northeastern United States using ensemble WRF-Hydro simulations, J. Hydrol.-Regional Studies, 47, 101371, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2023.101371, 2023.
Pelletier, J. D., Barron-Gafford, G. A., Gutiérrez-Jurado, H., Hinckley, E.-L. S., Istanbulluoglu, E., McGuire, L. A., Niu, G.-Y., Poulos, M. J., Rasmussen, C., Richardson, P., Swetnam, T. L., and Tucker, G. E.: Which way do you lean? Using slope aspect variations to understand Critical Zone processes and feedbacks, Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 43, 1133–1154, https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4306, 2018.
Peterson, T. J., Saft, M., Peel, M. C., and John, A.: Watersheds may not recover from drought, Science, 372, 745–749, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abd5085, 2021.
Pokhrel, Y. N., Hanasaki, N., Wada, Y., and Kim, H.: Recent progresses in incorporating human land–water management into global land surface models toward their integration into Earth system models, WIREs Water, 3, 548–574, https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1150, 2016.
Qiu, H., Bisht, G., Li, L., Hao, D., and Xu, D.: Development of inter-grid-cell lateral unsaturated and saturated flow model in the E3SM Land Model (v2.0), Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 143–167, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-143-2024, 2024.
Reyes, B., Maxwell, R. M., and Hogue, T. S.: Impact of lateral flow and spatial scaling on the simulation of semi-arid urban land surfaces in an integrated hydrologic and land surface model, Hydrol. Process., 30, 1192–1207, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10683, 2016.
Sakaguchi, K., Berg, L. K., Chen, J., Fast, J., Newsom, R., Tai, S.-L., Yang, Z., Gustafson Jr, W. I., Gaudet, B. J., Huang, M., Pekour, M., Pressel, K., and Xiao, H.: Determining Spatial Scales of Soil Moisture–Cloud Coupling Pathways Using Semi-Idealized Simulations, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 127, e2021JD035282, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD035282, 2022.
Sakaguchi, K. and Zeng, X.: Effects of soil wetness, plant litter, and under-canopy atmospheric stability on ground evaporation in the Community Land Model (CLM3.5), J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010834, 2009.
Sampson, A. A., Wright, D. B., Stewart, R. D., and LoBue, A. C.: The role of rainfall temporal and spatial averaging in seasonal simulations of the terrestrial water balance, Hydrol. Process., 34, 2531–2542, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13745, 2020.
Searle, R.: Australian Soil Classification Map, Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network (1.0.0) [data set], https://doi.org/10.25901/edyr-wg85, 2021.
Stephens, C. M., Marshall, L. A., Johnson, F. M., Ajami, H., Lin, L., and Band, L. E.: Spatial Variation in Catchment Response to Climate Change Depends on Lateral Moisture Transport and Nutrient Dynamics, Water Resour. Res., 58, e2021WR030577, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR030577, 2022.
Sun, Y., Goll, D. S., Chang, J., Ciais, P., Guenet, B., Helfenstein, J., Huang, Y., Lauerwald, R., Maignan, F., Naipal, V., Wang, Y., Yang, H., and Zhang, H.: Global evaluation of the nutrient-enabled version of the land surface model ORCHIDEE-CNP v1.2 (r5986), Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 1987–2010, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1987-2021, 2021.
Swenson, S. C., Clark, M., Fan, Y., Lawrence, D. M., and Perket, J.: Representing Intrahillslope Lateral Subsurface Flow in the Community Land Model, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 11, 4044–4065, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001833, 2019.
Tai, X., Anderegg, W. R. L., Blanken, P. D., Burns, S. P., Christensen, L., and Brooks, P. D.: Hillslope Hydrology Influences the Spatial and Temporal Patterns of Remotely Sensed Ecosystem Productivity, Water Resour. Res., 56, e2020WR027630, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR027630, 2020.
Teng, H., Viscarra Rossel, R. A., Shi, Z., and Behrens, T.: Updating a national soil classification with spectroscopic predictions and digital soil mapping, CATENA, 164, 125–134, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2018.01.015, 2018.
Ukkola, A. M., De Kauwe, M. G., Pitman, A. J., Best, M. J., Abramowitz, G., Haverd, V., Decker, M., and Haughton, N.: Land surface models systematically overestimate the intensity, duration and magnitude of seasonal-scale evaporative droughts, Environ. Res. Lett., 11, 104012, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/10/104012, 2016.
Viney, N., Vaze, J., Crosbie, R., Wang, B., Warrick, D., and Frost, A.: AWRA-L v5.0: Technical description of model algorithms and inputs, CSIRO, Canberra, https://doi.org/10.4225/08/58518bc790ff7, 2015.
Walters, D., Baran, A. J., Boutle, I., Brooks, M., Earnshaw, P., Edwards, J., Furtado, K., Hill, P., Lock, A., Manners, J., Morcrette, C., Mulcahy, J., Sanchez, C., Smith, C., Stratton, R., Tennant, W., Tomassini, L., Van Weverberg, K., Vosper, S., Willett, M., Browse, J., Bushell, A., Carslaw, K., Dalvi, M., Essery, R., Gedney, N., Hardiman, S., Johnson, B., Johnson, C., Jones, A., Jones, C., Mann, G., Milton, S., Rumbold, H., Sellar, A., Ujiie, M., Whitall, M., Williams, K., and Zerroukat, M.: The Met Office Unified Model Global Atmosphere 7.0/7.1 and JULES Global Land 7.0 configurations, Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 1909–1963, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-1909-2019, 2019.
Wang, J., Wang, C., Rao, V., Orr, A., Yan, E., and Kotamarthi, R.: A parallel workflow implementation for PEST version 13.6 in high-performance computing for WRF-Hydro version 5.0: a case study over the midwestern United States, Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 3523–3539, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3523-2019, 2019.
Wedi, N. P., Polichtchouk, I., Dueben, P., Anantharaj, V. G., Bauer, P., Boussetta, S., Browne, P., Deconinck, W., Gaudin, W., Hadade, I., Hatfield, S., Iffrig, O., Lopez, P., Maciel, P., Mueller, A., Saarinen, S., Sandu, I., Quintino, T., and Vitart, F.: A Baseline for Global Weather and Climate Simulations at 1 km Resolution, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 12, e2020MS002192, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020MS002192, 2020.
Wigmosta, M. S., Vail, L. W., and Lettenmaier, D. P.: A distributed hydrology-vegetation model for complex terrain, Water Resour. Res., 30, 1665–1679, https://doi.org/10.1029/94WR00436, 1994.
Wigmosta, M. S. and Lettenmaier, D. P.: A comparison of simplified methods for routing topographically driven subsurface flow, Water Resour. Res., 35, 255–264, https://doi.org/10.1029/1998WR900017, 1999.
Wu, W.-Y., Yang, Z.-L., and Barlage, M.: The Impact of Noah-MP Physical Parameterizations on Modeling Water Availability during Droughts in the Texas–Gulf Region, J. Hydrometeorol., 22, 1221–1233, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-20-0189.1, 2021.
Xu, C., Torres-Rojas, L., Vergopolan, N., and Chaney, N. W.: The Benefits of Using State-Of-The-Art Digital Soil Properties Maps to Improve the Modeling of Soil Moisture in Land Surface Models, Water Resour. Res., 59, e2022WR032336, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022WR032336, 2023.
Yamazaki, D., Sato, T., Kanae, S., Hirabayashi, Y., and Bates, P. D.: Regional flood dynamics in a bifurcating mega delta simulated in a global river model, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 3127–3135, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL059744, 2014.
Yang, Z., Huang, M., Berg, L. K., Qian, Y., Gustafson, W. I., Fang, Y., Liu, Y., Fast, J. D., Sakaguchi, K., and Tai, S.-L.: Impact of Lateral Flow on Surface Water and Energy Budgets Over the Southern Great Plains–A Modeling Study, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 126, e2020JD033659, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033659, 2021.
Yimam, Y. T., Neely, H. L., Morgan, C. L. S., Kishné, A., Gross, J., and Gochis, D.: Evaluation of Noah-MP performance with available soil information for vertically heterogenous soils, Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment, 8, e70048, https://doi.org/10.1002/agg2.70048, 2025.
Zhang, X.-Y., Fang, Y., Niu, G.-Y., Troch, P. A., Guo, B., Leung, L. R., Brunke, M. A., Broxton, P., and Zeng, X.: Impacts of Topography-Driven Water Redistribution on Terrestrial Water Storage Change in California Through Ecosystem Responses, Water Resour. Res., 60, e2023WR035572, https://doi.org/10.1029/2023WR035572, 2024.
Zhang, Y., Viney, N., Frost, A., Oke, A., Brooks, M., Chen, Y., and Campbell, N.: Collation of Australian modeller's streamflow dataset for 780 unregulated Australian catchments, CSIRO, https://doi.org/10.4225/08/58b5baad4fcc2, 2013.
Zhang, Z., Arnault, J., Laux, P., Ma, N., Wei, J., Shang, S., and Kunstmann, H.: Convection-permitting fully coupled WRF-Hydro ensemble simulations in high mountain environment: impact of boundary layer- and lateral flow parameterizations on land–atmosphere interactions, Clim. Dynam., https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-021-06044-9, 2021.
Zhu, B., Huang, M., Chen, X., Bisht, G., Shuai, P., and Xie, X.: River–aquifer interactions enhancing evapotranspiration in a semiarid riparian zone: A modelling study, Hydrol. Process., 38, e15230, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.15230, 2024.
Short summary
Including lateral flow increases evapotranspiration near major river channels in high-resolution land surface simulations in southeast Australia, consistent with observations. The 1-km resolution model shows a widespread pattern of dry ridges that does not exist at coarser resolutions. Our results have implications for improved simulations of droughts and future water availability.
Including lateral flow increases evapotranspiration near major river channels in high-resolution...
