Articles | Volume 28, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1317-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1317-2024
Technical note
 | 
22 Mar 2024
Technical note |  | 22 Mar 2024

Technical note: A model of chemical transport in a wellbore–aquifer system

Yiqun Gan and Quanrong Wang

Related authors

A general model of radial dispersion with wellbore mixing and skin effects
Wenguang Shi, Quanrong Wang, Hongbin Zhan, Renjie Zhou, and Haitao Yan
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1891–1908, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1891-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1891-2023, 2023
Short summary
New model of reactive transport in a single-well push–pull test with aquitard effect and wellbore storage
Quanrong Wang, Junxia Wang, Hongbin Zhan, and Wenguang Shi
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 3983–4000, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-3983-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-3983-2020, 2020

Related subject area

Subject: Groundwater hydrology | Techniques and Approaches: Modelling approaches
Disentangling coastal groundwater level dynamics in a global dataset
Annika Nolte, Ezra Haaf, Benedikt Heudorfer, Steffen Bender, and Jens Hartmann
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1215–1249, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1215-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1215-2024, 2024
Short summary
Current and future roles of meltwater–groundwater dynamics in a proglacial Alpine outwash plain
Tom Müller, Matteo Roncoroni, Davide Mancini, Stuart N. Lane, and Bettina Schaefli
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 735–759, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-735-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-735-2024, 2024
Short summary
On the challenges of global entity-aware deep learning models for groundwater level prediction
Benedikt Heudorfer, Tanja Liesch, and Stefan Broda
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 525–543, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-525-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-525-2024, 2024
Short summary
Incorporating interpretation uncertainties from deterministic 3D hydrostratigraphic models in groundwater models
Trine Enemark, Rasmus Bødker Madsen, Torben O. Sonnenborg, Lærke Therese Andersen, Peter B. E. Sandersen, Jacob Kidmose, Ingelise Møller, Thomas Mejer Hansen, Karsten Høgh Jensen, and Anne-Sophie Høyer
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 505–523, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-505-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-505-2024, 2024
Short summary
Adjoint subordination to calculate backward travel time probability of pollutants in water with various velocity resolutions
Yong Zhang, Graham E. Fogg, HongGuang Sun, Donald M. Reeves, Roseanna M. Neupauer, and Wei Wei
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 179–203, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-179-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-179-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Anderson, M. P., Woessner, W. W., and Hunt, R. J.: Applied groundwater modeling: simulation of flow and advective transport, Academic Press, Elsevier, https://doi.org/10.1016/C2009-0-21563-7, 2015. 
Chen, C. S.: Analytical and approximate solutions to radial dispersion from an injection well to a geological unit with simultaneous diffusion Into adjacent strata, Water Resour. Res., 21, 1069–1076, https://doi.org/10.1029/WR021i008p01069, 1985. 
Chen, J. S.: Analytical model for fully three-dimensional radial dispersion in a finite-thickness aquifer, Hydrol. Process., 24, 934–945, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7541, 2010. 
Chen, J. S., Liu, Y. H., Liang, C. P., Liu, C. W., and Lin, C. W.: Exact analytical solutions for two-dimensional advection–dispersion equation in cylindrical coordinates subject to third-type inlet boundary condition, Adv. Water Res., 34, 365–374, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2010.12.008, 2011. 
Chen, Y. J., Yeh, H. D., and Chang, K. J.: A mathematical solution and analysis of contaminant transport in a radial two-zone confined aquifer, J. Contam. Hydrol., 138–139, 75–82, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2012.06.006, 2012. 
Download
Short summary
1. A revised 3D model of solute transport is developed in the well–aquifer system. 2. The accuracy of the new model is tested against benchmark analytical solutions. 3. Previous models overestimate the concentration of solute in both aquifers and wellbores in the injection well test case. 4. Previous models underestimate the concentration in the extraction well test case.