De Cesarei, A., Cavicchi, S., Cristadoro, G., and Lippi, M.: Do humans and deep convolutional neural networks use visual information similarly for the categorization of natural scenes?, Cognit. Sci., 45, e13009,
https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13009, 2021.
a
Dodge, S. and Karam, L.: A study and comparison of human and deep learning recognition performance under visual distortions, in: IEEE Int. Conf. Comput. Communication and Networks, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 1–7,
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCCN.2017.8038465, 2017.
a
Dosovitskiy, A., Beyer, L., Kolesnikov, A., Weissenborn, D., Zhai, X., Unterthiner, T., Dehghani, M., Minderer, M., Heigold, G., Gelly, S., Uszkoreit, J., and Houlsby, N.: An image is worth
16×16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale, arXiv [preprint],
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2010.11929, 2020.
a
Elias, M., Eltner, A., Liebold, F., and Maas, H.-G.: Assessing the influence of temperature changes on the geometric stability of smartphone-and raspberry pi cameras, Sensors, 20, 643,
https://doi.org/10.3390/s20030643, 2020.
a
Eltner, A. and Schneider, C.: Analysis of different methods for 3d reconstruction of natural surfaces from parallel-axes uav images, Photogram. Rec., 30, 279–299, 2015. a
Eltner, A., Kaiser, A., Castillo, C., Rock, G., Neugirg, F., and Abellán, A.: Image-based surface reconstruction in geomorphometry – merits, limits and developments, Earth Surf. Dynam., 4, 359–389,
https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-4-359-2016, 2016.
a
Eltner, A., Elias, M., Sardemann, H., and Spieler, D.: Automatic image-based water stage measurement for long-term observations in ungauged catchments, Water Resour. Res., 54, 10362–10371,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR023913, 2018.
a
Eltner, A., Bressan, P. O., Akiyama, T., Gonçalves, W. N., and Marcato Junior, J.: Using deep learning for automatic water stage measurements, Water Resour. Res., 57, e2020WR027608,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR027608, 2021.
a
Erfani, S. M. H., Wu, Z., Wu, X., Wang, S., and Goharian, E.: Atlantis: A benchmark for semantic segmentation of waterbody images, Environ. Model. Softw., 149, 105333,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2022.105333, 2022.
a
Froideval, L., Pedoja, K., Garestier, F., Moulon, P., Conessa, C., Pellerin Le Bas, X., Traoré, K., and Benoit, L.: A low-cost open-source workflow to generate georeferenced 3d sfm photogrammetric models of rocky outcrops, Photogram. Rec., 34, 365–384, 2019. a
Fu, J., Liu, J., Tian, H., Li, Y., Bao, Y., Fang, Z., and Lu, H.: Dual attention network for scene segmentation, in: IEEE Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recog., Long Beach, CA, USA, 3141–3149,
https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2019.00326, 2019.
a
Gebrehiwot, A., Hashemi-Beni, L., Thompson, G., Kordjamshidi, P., and Langan, T. E.: Deep convolutional neural network for flood extent mapping using unmanned aerial vehicles data, Sensors, 19, 1486,
https://doi.org/10.3390/s19071486, 2019.
a
Geirhos, R., Rubisch, P., Michaelis, C., Bethge, M., Wichmann, F. A., and Brendel, W.: Imagenet-trained cnns are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustness, arXiv [preprint],
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1811.12231, 2018a.
a,
b
Geirhos, R., Temme, C. R. M., Rauber, J., H Schütt, H., Bethge, M., and Wichmann, F. A.: Generalisation in humans and deep neural networks, Adv. Neural Inform. Process. Syst., 31, 7538–7550, ISBN 9781510884472, 2018b. a
Gollob, C., Ritter, T., Kraßnitzer, R., Tockner, A., and Nothdurft, A.: Measurement of forest inventory parameters with Apple iPad pro and integrated LiDAR technology, Remote Sens., 13, 3129,
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13163129, 2021.
a,
b,
c
Goodchild, M. F.: Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography, Geo J., 69, 211–221, 2007. a
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., and Sun, J.: Deep residual learning for image recognition, in: IEEE Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recog., Las Vegas, NV, USA, 770–778,
https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2016.90, 2016.
a
Huang, Z., Wang, X., Huang, L., Huang, C., Wei, Y., and Liu, W.: Ccnet: Criss-cross attention for semantic segmentation, in: Int. Conf. Comput. Vis., Seoul, South Korea, 603–612,
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCV.2019.00069, 2019.
a
Knoben, W. J. M., Freer, J. E., and Woods, R. A.: Technical note: Inherent benchmark or not? Comparing Nash–Sutcliffe and Kling–Gupta efficiency scores, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 4323–4331,
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4323-2019, 2019.
a
Krause, P., Boyle, D. P., and Bäse, F.: Comparison of different efficiency criteria for hydrological model assessment, Adv. Geosci., 5, 89–97,
https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-5-89-2005, 2005.
a
LAAN LABS: 3D Scanner App – LiDAR Scanner for iPad Pro & iPhone Pro,
https://3dscannerapp.com/ (last access: 16 September 2022), 2022. a
Li, X., Zhong, Z., Wu, J., Yang, Y., Lin, Z., and Liu, H.: Expectation-maximization attention networks for semantic segmentation, in: Int. Conf. Comput. Vis., Seoul, South Korea, 9166–9175,
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCV.2019.00926, 2019.
a
Li, Z., Wang, C., Emrich, C. T., and Guo, D.: A novel approach to leveraging social media for rapid flood mapping: a case study of the 2015 south carolina floods, Cartogr. Geogr. Inform. Sci., 45, 97–110, 2018. a
Lin, G., Milan, A., Shen, C., and Reid, I.: Refinenet: Multi-path refinement networks for high-resolution semantic segmentation, in: IEEE Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recog., Honolulu, HI, USA, 5168–5177,
https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2017.549, 2017.
a,
b
Lin, P., Pan, M., Allen, G. H., de Frasson, R. P., Zeng, Z., Yamazaki, D., and Wood, E. F.: Global estimates of reach-level bankfull river width leveraging big data geospatial analysis, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2019GL086405,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL086405, 2020.
a
Liu, Z., Lin, Y., Cao, Y., Hu, H., Wei, Y., Zhang, Z., Lin, S., and Guo, B.: Swin transformer: Hierarchical vision transformer using shifted windows, in: Int. Conf. Comput. Vis., Montreal, QC, Canada, 9992–10002,
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCV48922.2021.00986, 2021.
a
Lo, S.-W., Wu, J.-H., Lin, F.-P., and Hsu, C.-H.: Visual sensing for urban flood monitoring, Sensors, 15, 20006–20029, 2015. a
Long, J., Shelhamer, E., and Darrell, T.: Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation, in: IEEE Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recog., Boston, MA, USA, 3431–3440,
https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2015.7298965, 2015.
a
Minaee, S., Boykov, Y. Y., Porikli, F., Plaza, A. J., Kehtarnavaz, N., and Terzopoulos, D.: Image segmentation using deep learning: A survey, IEEE T. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intel., 44, 3523–3542,
https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2021.3059968, 2022.
a
Mokroš, M., Mikita, T., Singh, A., Tomaštík, J., Chudá, J., Wężyk, P., Kuželka, K., Surovỳ, P., Klimánek, M., Zięba-Kulawik, K., Bobrowski, R., and Liang, X.: Novel low-cost mobile mapping systems for forest inventories as terrestrial laser scanning alternatives, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf., 104, 102512,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2021.102512, 2021.
a
Morsy, M. M., Goodall, J. L., Shatnawi, F. M., and Meadows, M. E.: Distributed stormwater controls for flood mitigation within urbanized watersheds: case study of rocky branch watershed in columbia, south carolina, J. Hydrol. Eng., 21, 05016025,
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001430, 2016.
a
Moy de Vitry, M., Kramer, S., Wegner, J. D., and Leitão, J. P.: Scalable flood level trend monitoring with surveillance cameras using a deep convolutional neural network, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 4621–4634,
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4621-2019, 2019.
a
Naseer, M. M., Ranasinghe, K., Khan, S. H., Hayat, M., Shahbaz Khan, F., and Yang, M.-H.: Intriguing properties of vision transformers, Adv. Neural Inform. Process. Syst., 34, 23296–23308, 2021. a
Noh, H., Hong, S., and Han, B.: Learning deconvolution network for semantic segmentation, in: Int. Conf. Comput. Vis., Santiago, Chile, 1520–1528,
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCV.2015.178, 2015.
a
Pally, R. J. and Samadi, S.: Application of image processing and convolutional neural networks for flood image classification and semantic segmentation, Environ. Model. Softw., 148, 105285,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2021.105285, 2022.
a
Panteras, G. and Cervone, G.: Enhancing the temporal resolution of
satellite-based flood extent generation using crowdsourced data for disaster monitoring, Int. J. Remote Sens., 39, 1459–1474, 2018. a
Schnebele, E., Cervone, G., and Waters, N.: Road assessment after flood events using non-authoritative data, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 1007–1015,
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-1007-2014, 2014.
a
Shamsabadi, E. A., Xu, C., and Dias-da Costa, D.: Robust crack detection in masonry structures with transformers, Measurement, 200, 111590,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2022.111590, 2022.
a
Smith, C., Satme, J., Martin, J., Downey, A. R. J., Vitzilaios, N., and Imran, J.: UAV rapidly-deployable stage sensor with electro-permanent magnet docking mechanism for flood monitoring in undersampled watersheds, HardwareX, 12, e00325,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ohx.2022.e00325, 2022.
a,
b
Tavani, S., Billi, A., Corradetti, A., Mercuri, M., Bosman, A., Cuffaro, M., Seers, T., and Carminati, E.: Smartphone assisted fieldwork: Towards the digital transition of geoscience fieldwork using lidar-equipped iphones, Earth-Sci. Rev., 227, 103969,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2022.103969, 2022.
a
Turnipseed, D. P. and Sauer, V. B.: Discharge measurements at gaging stations, Technical report, US Geological Survey,
https://doi.org/10.3133/tm3A8, 2010.
a
Vandaele, R., Dance, S. L., and Ojha, V.: Deep learning for automated river-level monitoring through river-camera images: an approach based on water segmentation and transfer learning, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 4435–4453,
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-4435-2021, 2021.
a
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, Ł., and Polosukhin, I.: Attention is all you need, Adv. Neural Inform. Process. Syst., 30, 5998–6008, ISBN 9781510860964, 2017. a
Vogt, M., Rips, A., and Emmelmann, C.: Comparison of ipad pro's lidar and truedepth capabilities with an industrial 3d scanning solution, Technologies, 9, 25,
https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies9020025, 2021.
a
Westoby, M. J., Brasington, J., Glasser, N. F., Hambrey, M. J., and Reynolds, J. M.: `structure-from-motion' photogrammetry: A low-cost, effective tool for geoscience applications, Geomorphology, 179, 300–314, 2012. a
Xie, E., Wang, W., Yu, Z., Anandkumar, A., Alvarez, J. M., and Luo, P.: Segformer: Simple and efficient design for semantic segmentation with transformers, Adv. Neural Inform. Process. Syst., 34, 12077–12090, 2021.
a,
b,
c,
d
Yuan, Y., Chen, X., and Wang, J.: Object-contextual representations for semantic segmentation, in: Eur. Conf. Comput. Vis., Springer, 173–190,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58539-6_11, 2020.
a
Zhang, Z., Zhou, Y., Liu, H., and Gao, H.: In-situ water level measurement using nir-imaging video camera, Flow Meas. Instrum., 67, 95–106, 2019. a
Zhao, H., Shi, J., Qi, X., Wang, X., and Jia, J.: Pyramid scene parsing network, in: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, Honolulu, HI, USA, 6230–6239,
https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2017.660, 2017.
a,
b,
c,
d
Zheng, Y., Huang, J., Chen, T., Ou, Y., and Zhou, W.: Processing global and local features in convolutional neural network (cnn) and primate visual systems, Mobile Multimed./Image Process. Secur. Appl., 10668, 44–51, 2018. a
Zhu, Z., Xu, M., Bai, S., Huang, T., and Bai, X.: Asymmetric non-local neural networks for semantic segmentation. in: Int. Conf. Comput. Vis., Seoul, South Korea, 593–602,
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCV.2019.00068, 2019.
a
