Articles | Volume 27, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1089-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1089-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Bayesian calibration of a flood simulator using binary flood extent observations
Laboratorio de Materiales y Estructuras, School of Engineering, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
David Charles Bonaventure Lallemant
Earth Observatory of Singapore, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
Related authors
No articles found.
Masashi Watanabe, Adam D. Switzer, Erandani Lakshani Widana Arachchige, Constance Ting Chua, Jun Yu Puah, Elaine Tan, Timothy A. Shaw, and David Lallemant
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5703, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5703, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences (NHESS).
Short summary
Short summary
We investigated storm surge risk in Singapore using computer simulations to understand how storms of different strengths and paths may affect the city under present and future sea levels. We found that storm surge height changes little as sea level rises, but the flooded area grows greatly. This shows that rising seas are the main cause of increased inundation and highlights the need to consider future sea levels when assessing and preparing for flooding in Singapore.
Alina Bill-Weilandt, Nivedita Sairam, Dennis Wagenaar, Kasra Rafiezadeh Shahi, Heidi Kreibich, Perrine Hamel, and David Lallemant
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3706, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3706, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Flooding is a major cause of agricultural loss globally. We introduce a framework for developing and evaluating flood damage models for crops. The study presents the most comprehensive review of such models for rice to date and offers practical guidance on model selection and expected errors when transferring models across regions. We provide models and lookup tables that can be used in flood risk assessments in rice-producing regions.
Jun Yu Puah, Ivan D. Haigh, David Lallemant, Kyle Morgan, Dongju Peng, Masashi Watanabe, and Adam D. Switzer
Ocean Sci., 20, 1229–1246, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-20-1229-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-20-1229-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Coastal currents have wide implications for port activities, transport of sediments, and coral reef ecosystems; thus a deeper understanding of their characteristics is needed. We collected data on current velocities for a year using current meters at shallow waters in Singapore. The strength of the currents is primarily affected by tides and winds and generally increases during the monsoon seasons across various frequencies.
Constance Ting Chua, Adam D. Switzer, Anawat Suppasri, Linlin Li, Kwanchai Pakoksung, David Lallemant, Susanna F. Jenkins, Ingrid Charvet, Terence Chua, Amanda Cheong, and Nigel Winspear
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 1887–1908, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-1887-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-1887-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Port industries are extremely vulnerable to coastal hazards such as tsunamis. Despite their pivotal role in local and global economies, there has been little attention paid to tsunami impacts on port industries. For the first time, tsunami damage data are being extensively collected for port structures and catalogued into a database. The study also provides fragility curves which describe the probability of damage exceedance for different port industries given different tsunami intensities.
Cited articles
Alfonso, L., Mukolwe, M. M., and Di Baldassarre, G.: Probabilistic Flood
Maps to Support Decision-Making: Mapping the Value of Information: Probabilistic Flood Maps To Support Decision-Making: VOI-MAP, Water Resour. Res., 52, 1026–1043, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017378, 2016. a
Balbi, M.: Code and Data Github repository for “Bayesian calibration of a flood simulator using binary flood extent observations”, Zenodo [code and data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7682138, 2022. a
Bates, P. D., Horritt, M. S., Aronica, G., and Beven, K.: Bayesian Updating of Flood Inundation Likelihoods Conditioned on Flood Extent Data, Hydrol.
Process., 18, 3347–3370, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.1499, 2004. a
Berrett, C. and Calder, C. A.: Bayesian Spatial Binary Classification, Spat. Stat., 16, 72–102, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spasta.2016.01.004, 2016. a, b
Beven, K.: A Framework for Uncertainty Analysis, Imperial College Press, 39–59, https://doi.org/10.1142/9781848162716_0003, 2014a. a, b
Beven, K.: The GLUE Methodology for Model Calibration with Uncertainty, Imperial College Press, 87–97, https://doi.org/10.1142/9781848162716_0006, 2014b. a, b
Beven, K.: Facets of Uncertainty: Epistemic Uncertainty, Non-Stationarity,
Likelihood, Hypothesis Testing, and Communication, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 61, 1652–1665, https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2015.1031761, 2016. a
Beven, K. and Binley, A.: The Future of Distributed Models: Model Calibration and Uncertainty Prediction, Hydrol. Process., 6, 279–298,
https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.3360060305, 1992. a
Botev, Z. and Belzile, L.: TruncatedNormal: Truncated Multivariate Normal and
Student Distributions, r package version 2.2.2, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=TruncatedNormal (last access: 5 August 2022), 2021. a
Cao, F., Ba, S., Brenneman, W. A., and Joseph, V. R.: Model Calibration With
Censored Data, Technometrics, 60, 255–262, https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.2017.1345704, 2018. a, b, c
Carbajal, J. P., Leitão, J. P., Albert, C., and Rieckermann, J.: Appraisal of Data-Driven and Mechanistic Emulators of Nonlinear Simulators: The Case of Hydrodynamic Urban Drainage Models, Environ. Model. Softw., 92, 17–27, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.02.006, 2017. a
Chang, W., Konomi, B. A., Karagiannis, G., Guan, Y., and Haran, M.: Ice Model
Calibration Using Semi-Continuous Spatial Data, arXiv [preprint], arXiv:1907.13554 [stat], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1907.13554, 2019. a, b, c, d
Chib, S. and Greenberg, E.: Analysis of Multivariate Probit Models, Analysis of multivariate probit models, Biometrika, 85, 347–361, 1998. a
Di Baldassarre, G.: Floods in a Changing Climate: Inundation Modelling, in:
no. 3 in International Hydrology Series, Cambridge University Press,
ISBN 978-1-139-08841-1, 2012. a
Di Baldassarre, G., Schumann, G., and Bates, P. D.: A Technique for the
Calibration of Hydraulic Models Using Uncertain Satellite Observations of
Flood Extent, J. Hydrol., 367, 276–282, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.01.020, 2009. a
Di Baldassarre, G., Schumann, G., Bates, P. D., Freer, J. E., and Beven, K. J.: Flood-Plain Mapping: A Critical Discussion of Deterministic and Probabilistic Approaches, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 55, 364–376,
https://doi.org/10.1080/02626661003683389, 2010. a, b
Genz, A.: Numerical Computation of Multivariate Normal Probabilities, J. Comput. Graph. Stat. 1, 141–149, https://doi.org/10.2307/1390838, 1992. a, b
Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery: Understanding Risk in an Evolving World: Emerging Best Practices in Natural Disaster Risk Assessment, Tech. rep., The World Bank, https://www.gfdrr.org/sites/default/files/publication/Understanding_Risk-Web_Version-rev_1.8.0.pdf (last access: 5 August 2022), 2014. a
Hall, J. and Solomatine, D.: A Framework for Uncertainty Analysis in Flood Risk Management Decisions, Int. J. River Basin Manage., 6, 85–98, https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2008.9635339, 2008. a
Hall, J. W., Manning, L. J., and Hankin, R. K.: Bayesian Calibration of a Flood Inundation Model Using Spatial Data, Water Resour. Res., 47, 5529,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008541, 2011. a, b, c, d
Horritt, M. S.: A Methodology for the Validation of Uncertain Flood Inundation Models, J. Hydrol., 326, 153–165, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.10.027, 2006. a, b
Hunter, N. M., Bates, P. D., Horritt, M. S., De Roo, A. P. J., and Werner, M.
G. F.: Utility of Different Data Types for Calibrating Flood Inundation
Models within a GLUE Framework, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 9, 412–430, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-9-412-2005, 2005. a, b, c, d
Jha, A. K., Bloch, R., and Lamond, J.: Cities and Flooding: A Guide to
Integrated Urban Flood Risk Management for the 21st Century, The World Bank, https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-8866-2, 2012. a
Jiang, P., Zhou, Q., and Shao, X.: Surrogate Model-Based Engineering Design and Optimization, in: Springer Tracts in Mechanical Engineering, Springer Singapore, Singapore, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0731-1, 2020. a
Kiczko, A., Romanowicz, R. J., Osuch, M., and Karamuz, E.: Maximising the
Usefulness of Flood Risk Assessment for the River Vistula in Warsaw, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 3443–3455, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-3443-2013, 2013. a
Mason, D. C., Bates, P. D., and Dall' Amico, J. T.: Calibration of Uncertain
Flood Inundation Models Using Remotely Sensed Water Levels, J. Hydrol., 368, 224–236, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.02.034, 2009. a
Moges, E., Demissie, Y., Larsen, L., and Yassin, F.: Review: Sources of
Hydrological Model Uncertainties and Advances in Their Analysis, Water, 13, 28, https://doi.org/10.3390/w13010028, 2021. a
Neal, J., Schumann, G., and Bates, P.: A Subgrid Channel Model for Simulating
River Hydraulics and Floodplain Inundation over Large and Data Sparse Areas,
Water Resour. Res., 48, 1–16, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012WR012514, 2012. a
Oliveira, V. D.: Bayesian Prediction of Clipped Gaussian Random Fields,
Comput. Stat. Data Anal., 34, 299–314, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9473(99)00103-6, 2000. a, b, c
Papaioannou, G., Vasiliades, L., Loukas, A., and Aronica, G. T.: Probabilistic Flood Inundation Mapping at Ungauged Streams Due to Roughness Coefficient Uncertainty in Hydraulic Modelling, Adv. Geosci., 44, 23–34,
https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-44-23-2017, 2017. a
Pappenberger, F., Beven, K., Horritt, M., and Blazkova, S.: Uncertainty in the Calibration of Effective Roughness Parameters in HEC-RAS Using Inundation and Downstream Level Observations, J. Hydrol., 302, 46–69, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.06.036, 2005. a
R Core Team: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria,
https://www.R-project.org/ (last access: 5 August 2022), 2020. a
Reichert, P. and Schuwirth, N.: Linking Statistical Bias Description to
Multiobjective Model Calibration, Water Resour. Res., 48, W09543, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR011391, 2012. a
Romanowicz, R. and Beven, K.: Estimation of Flood Inundation Probabilities as
Conditioned on Event Inundation Maps, Water Resour. Res., 39, 1073,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2001WR001056, 2003. a
Romanowicz, R. J. and Kiczko, A.: An Event Simulation Approach to the
Assessment of Flood Level Frequencies: Risk Maps for the Warsaw Reach of the River Vistula: Event Simulation Approach to Flood Risk Assessment, Hydrol. Process., 30, 2451–2462, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10857, 2016. a
Romanowicz, R. J., Beven, K. J., and Tawn, J. A.: Bayesian Calibration of Flood Inundation Models, in: Floodplain Processes, John Wiley & Sons, ISBN 978-0-471-96679-1, 1996. a
Rougier, J.: Formal Bayes Methods for Model Calibration with Uncertainty, Imperial College Press, 68–86, https://doi.org/10.1142/9781848162716_0005, 2014. a, b, c, d
Sadegh, M. and Vrugt, J. A.: Bridging the Gap between GLUE and Formal
Statistical Approaches: Approximate Bayesian Computation, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 4831–4850, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-4831-2013, 2013. a, b, c
Sargsyan, K., Najm, H. N., and Ghanem, R.: On the Statistical Calibration of Physical Models, Int. J. Chem. Kinet., 47, 246–276, https://doi.org/10.1002/kin.20906, 2015. a
Stedinger, J. R., Vogel, R. M., Lee, S. U., and Batchelder, R.: Appraisal of
the generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) method, Water Resour. Res., 44, W00B06, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR006822, 2008. a, b
Stephens, E. and Bates, P.: Assessing the Reliability of Probabilistic Flood
Inundation Model Predictions, Hydrol. Process., 29, 4264–4283,
https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10451, 2015. a, b, c
Vrugt, J. A., ter Braak, C. J., Gupta, H. V., and Robinson, B. A.: Equifinality of Formal (DREAM) and Informal (GLUE) Bayesian Approaches in Hydrologic Modeling?, Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk A., 23, 1011–1026, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-008-0274-y, 2009. a
Wani, O., Scheidegger, A., Carbajal, J. P., Rieckermann, J., and Blumensaat,
F.: Parameter Estimation of Hydrologic Models Using a Likelihood Function for
Censored and Binary Observations, Water Res., 121, 290–301,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.05.038, 2017. a, b, c, d
Wani, O., Scheidegger, A., Cecinati, F., Espadas, G., and Rieckermann, J.:
Exploring a Copula-Based Alternative to Additive Error Models for Non-Negative and Autocorrelated Time Series in Hydrology, J. Hydrol., 575, 1031–1040, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.06.006, 2019. a
Werner, M., Blazkova, S., and Petr, J.: Spatially Distributed Observations in
Constraining Inundation Modelling Uncertainties, Hydrol. Process., 19,
3081–3096, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5833, 2005. a, b, c, d
Wood, M., Hostache, R., Neal, J., Wagener, T., Giustarini, L., Chini, M.,
Corato, G., Matgen, P., and Bates, P.: Calibration of Channel Depth and
Friction Parameters in the LISFLOOD-FP Hydraulic Model Using Medium-Resolution SAR Data and Identifiability Techniques, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 20, 4983–4997, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-4983-2016, 2016. a, b
Woodhead, S. P. B.: Bayesian Calibration of Flood Inundation Simulators Using
an Observation of Flood Extent, PhD Thesis, University of Bristol, Bristol, https://research-information.bris.ac.uk/en/studentTheses/bayesian-calibration-of-flood-inundation-simulators-using-an
(last access: 5 August 2022), 2007. a, b, c, d
Short summary
We proposed a methodology to obtain useful and robust probabilistic predictions from computational flood simulators using satellite-borne flood extent observations. We developed a Bayesian framework to obtain the uncertainty in roughness parameters, in observations errors, and in simulator structural deficiencies. We found that it can yield improvements in predictions relative to current methodologies and can potentially lead to consistent ways of combining data from different sources.
We proposed a methodology to obtain useful and robust probabilistic predictions from...