Articles | Volume 26, issue 21
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5669–5683, 2022
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5669–5683, 2022
Research article
10 Nov 2022
Research article | 10 Nov 2022

Seamless streamflow forecasting at daily to monthly scales: MuTHRE lets you have your cake and eat it too

David McInerney et al.

Related authors

Flexible forecast value metric suitable for a wide range of decisions: application using probabilistic subseasonal streamflow forecasts
Richard Laugesen, Mark Thyer, David McInerney, and Dmitri Kavetski
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss.,,, 2022
Revised manuscript accepted for HESS
Short summary
Evaluating post-processing approaches for monthly and seasonal streamflow forecasts
Fitsum Woldemeskel, David McInerney, Julien Lerat, Mark Thyer, Dmitri Kavetski, Daehyok Shin, Narendra Tuteja, and George Kuczera
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 6257–6278,,, 2018
Short summary
State updating and calibration period selection to improve dynamic monthly streamflow forecasts for an environmental flow management application
Matthew S. Gibbs, David McInerney, Greer Humphrey, Mark A. Thyer, Holger R. Maier, Graeme C. Dandy, and Dmitri Kavetski
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 871–887,,, 2018
Short summary
Estimating changes in temperature extremes from millennial-scale climate simulations using generalized extreme value (GEV) distributions
Whitney K. Huang, Michael L. Stein, David J. McInerney, Shanshan Sun, and Elisabeth J. Moyer
Adv. Stat. Clim. Meteorol. Oceanogr., 2, 79–103,,, 2016

Related subject area

Subject: Engineering Hydrology | Techniques and Approaches: Uncertainty analysis
Intercomparison of global reanalysis precipitation for flood risk modelling
Fergus McClean, Richard Dawson, and Chris Kilsby
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss.,,, 2021
Revised manuscript accepted for HESS
Short summary
An uncertainty partition approach for inferring interactive hydrologic risks
Yurui Fan, Kai Huang, Guohe Huang, Yongping Li, and Feng Wang
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 4601–4624,,, 2020
Predicting discharge capacity of vegetated compound channels: uncertainty and identifiability of one-dimensional process-based models
Adam Kiczko, Kaisa Västilä, Adam Kozioł, Janusz Kubrak, Elżbieta Kubrak, and Marcin Krukowski
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 4135–4167,,, 2020
Short summary
Uncertainty quantification of floodplain friction in hydrodynamic models
Guilherme Luiz Dalledonne, Rebekka Kopmann, and Thomas Brudy-Zippelius
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 3373–3385,,, 2019
Short summary
Developing a drought-monitoring index for the contiguous US using SMAP
Sara Sadri, Eric F. Wood, and Ming Pan
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 6611–6626,,, 2018
Short summary

Cited articles

Bauer, D. F.: Constructing Confidence Sets Using Rank Statistics, J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 67, 687–690,, 1972. 
Benjamini, Y. and Hochberg, Y.: Controlling the false discovery rate – a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing, J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B Met., 57, 289–300, 1995. 
Boucher, M.-A. and Ramos, M.-H.: Ensemble Streamflow Forecasts for Hydropower Systems, in: Handbook of Hydrometeorological Ensemble Forecasting, edited by: Duan, Q., Pappenberger, F., Wood, A., Cloke, H. L., and Schaake, J. C., Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1289–1306, ISBN 978-3-642-39924-4, 2019. 
Box, G. E. P. and Cox, D. R.: An analysis of transformations, J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B, 26, 211–252, 1964. 
Bureau of Meteorology: Long-range weather, climate and hydrology,
Short summary
Streamflow forecasts a day to a month ahead are highly valuable for water resources management. Current practice often develops forecasts for specific lead times and aggregation timescales. In contrast, a single, seamless forecast can serve multiple lead times/timescales. This study shows seamless forecasts can match the performance of forecasts developed specifically at the monthly scale, while maintaining quality at other lead times. Hence, users need not sacrifice capability for performance.