Articles | Volume 26, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-197-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-197-2022
Research article
 | 
14 Jan 2022
Research article |  | 14 Jan 2022

Choosing between post-processing precipitation forecasts or chaining several uncertainty quantification tools in hydrological forecasting systems

Emixi Sthefany Valdez, François Anctil, and Maria-Helena Ramos

Viewed

Total article views: 5,868 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
4,408 1,332 128 5,868 210 129 152
  • HTML: 4,408
  • PDF: 1,332
  • XML: 128
  • Total: 5,868
  • Supplement: 210
  • BibTeX: 129
  • EndNote: 152
Views and downloads (calculated since 16 Aug 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 16 Aug 2021)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 5,868 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 5,595 with geography defined and 273 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Saved (final revised paper)

Latest update: 30 Apr 2026
Download
Short summary
We investigated how a precipitation post-processor interacts with other tools for uncertainty quantification in a hydrometeorological forecasting chain. Four systems were implemented to generate 7 d ensemble streamflow forecasts, which vary from partial to total uncertainty estimation. Overall analysis showed that post-processing and initial condition estimation ensure the most skill improvements, in some cases even better than a system that considers all sources of uncertainty.
Share