Articles | Volume 26, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-197-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-197-2022
Research article
 | 
14 Jan 2022
Research article |  | 14 Jan 2022

Choosing between post-processing precipitation forecasts or chaining several uncertainty quantification tools in hydrological forecasting systems

Emixi Sthefany Valdez, François Anctil, and Maria-Helena Ramos

Viewed

Total article views: 4,125 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
3,013 1,026 86 4,125 130 84 94
  • HTML: 3,013
  • PDF: 1,026
  • XML: 86
  • Total: 4,125
  • Supplement: 130
  • BibTeX: 84
  • EndNote: 94
Views and downloads (calculated since 16 Aug 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 16 Aug 2021)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 4,125 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 3,906 with geography defined and 219 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 15 Jul 2025
Download
Short summary
We investigated how a precipitation post-processor interacts with other tools for uncertainty quantification in a hydrometeorological forecasting chain. Four systems were implemented to generate 7 d ensemble streamflow forecasts, which vary from partial to total uncertainty estimation. Overall analysis showed that post-processing and initial condition estimation ensure the most skill improvements, in some cases even better than a system that considers all sources of uncertainty.
Share