Articles | Volume 25, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-2979-2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-2979-2021
Research article
 | 
03 Jun 2021
Research article |  | 03 Jun 2021

Performance of automated methods for flash flood inundation mapping: a comparison of a digital terrain model (DTM) filling and two hydrodynamic methods

Nabil Hocini, Olivier Payrastre, François Bourgin, Eric Gaume, Philippe Davy, Dimitri Lague, Lea Poinsignon, and Frederic Pons

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (further review by editor) (25 Mar 2021) by Giuseppe Tito Aronica
AR by Olivier Payrastre on behalf of the Authors (31 Mar 2021)  Author's response   Author's tracked changes   Manuscript 
ED: Publish as is (23 Apr 2021) by Giuseppe Tito Aronica
AR by Olivier Payrastre on behalf of the Authors (30 Apr 2021)
Download
Short summary
Efficient flood mapping methods are needed for large-scale, comprehensive identification of flash flood inundation hazards caused by small upstream rivers. An evaluation of three automated mapping approaches of increasing complexity, i.e., a digital terrain model (DTM) filling and two 1D–2D hydrodynamic approaches, is presented based on three major flash floods in southeastern France. The results illustrate some limits of the DTM filling method and the value of using a 2D hydrodynamic approach.