The reviews offer detailed points that require consideration, with appropriate clarifications in a revised manuscript.
The authors' responses appear well thought out and convincing, and a revised manuscript reflecting the additional information and clarifications can fully address the reviews. Please proceed with a thorough revision.
I note that some of the author responses (particularly to referee #2) consisted of a detailed commentary, but actual revision to the manuscript was not included. Please reconsider - in most cases, where a detailed response is needed, even to justify/clarify why something was or was not included in the analysis, at least a short additional explanation is helpful in the manuscript itself (if a referee had a question, it's reasonable to assume that other readers may have the same one).

The authors have done an excellent job of revising the manuscript to address the review comments.