Articles | Volume 22, issue 5
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 2811–2837, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-2811-2018
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 2811–2837, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-2811-2018

Research article 08 May 2018

Research article | 08 May 2018

Comparison of precipitation measurements by OTT Parsivel2 and Thies LPM optical disdrometers

Marta Angulo-Martínez et al.

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
ED: Publish subject to revisions (further review by editor and referees) (06 Mar 2018) by Matjaz Mikos
AR by Santiago Beguería on behalf of the Authors (06 Mar 2018)  Author's response    Manuscript
ED: Publish subject to revisions (further review by editor and referees) (17 Mar 2018) by Matjaz Mikos
ED: Publish as is (17 Apr 2018) by Matjaz Mikos
Download
Short summary
Two optical disdrometers, OTT Parsivel2 disdrometer and Thies Clima laser precipitation monitor (LPM), are compared. Analysis of 2 years of one-minute replicated data showed significant differences. Thies LPM recorded a larger number of particles than Parsivel2 and a higher proportion of small particles, resulting in higher rain rates and amounts and differences in radar reflectivity and kinetic energy. Possible causes for these differences, and their practical consequences, are discussed.