Dear Authors,

the two reviewers acknowledged the research and quality in your paper, but also raised some valuable comments to improve the paper.
However, I think, that all the reviewer comments can be addressed in a revised version.
Both reviewer raised the comment on the point, how universal or site specific your findings are. I think this is an important point, which should be carefully addressed.

Best regards
Ralf Merz

I have assessed the manuscript as well as the Authors’ replies to the Reviewers’ comments/suggestions. From a personal standpoint, it is not clear how the Authors have quantified the uncertainty associated their estimated model parameters. Without a clear analysis of this aspect, results could be of indeterminate quality. Before making my final decision, I would like to Authors to provide a clear answer to this point. I am confident this would entail solely a set of minor revisions.

I do think the Authors have address reasonably the comments raised during the review process and I see no particular reason to delay acceptance.