Articles | Volume 21, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-2967-2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-2967-2017
Research article
 | 
19 Jun 2017
Research article |  | 19 Jun 2017

Moving beyond the cost–loss ratio: economic assessment of streamflow forecasts for a risk-averse decision maker

Simon Matte, Marie-Amélie Boucher, Vincent Boucher, and Thomas-Charles Fortier Filion

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
ED: Reconsider after major revisions (further review by Editor and Referees) (19 Jan 2017) by Uwe Ehret
AR by Marie-Amélie Boucher on behalf of the Authors (06 Mar 2017)  Manuscript 
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (09 Mar 2017) by Uwe Ehret
RR by Anonymous Referee #1 (04 Apr 2017)
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (further review by Editor) (11 Apr 2017) by Uwe Ehret
AR by Marie-Amélie Boucher on behalf of the Authors (20 Apr 2017)  Author's response   Manuscript 
ED: Publish as is (24 Apr 2017) by Uwe Ehret
AR by Marie-Amélie Boucher on behalf of the Authors (01 May 2017)  Manuscript 
Download
Short summary
In this study we set the basis of an alternative framework to replace the popular cost-loss ratio for the economic assessment of flood forecasting systems. The C-L ratio implicitly considers the decision maker to be risk-neutral, whereas it is rarely the case in real-life emergency situations. Instead of the cost-loss ratio, we propose using a utility function. We show that the decision-maker’s level of risk aversion is a crucial factor in the assessment of the economic value of flood forecasts.