Articles | Volume 20, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-3947-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-3947-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Research article
| 
26 Sep 2016
Research article |
| 26 Sep 2016
How streamflow has changed across Australia since the 1950s: evidence from the network of hydrologic reference stations
Xiaoyong Sophie Zhang
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Environment and Research Division, Bureau of Meteorology, Melbourne, Australia
Gnanathikkam E. Amirthanathan
Environment and Research Division, Bureau of Meteorology, Melbourne, Australia
Mohammed A. Bari
Bureau of Meteorology, Perth, Australia
Richard M. Laugesen
Bureau of Meteorology, Canberra, Australia
Daehyok Shin
Environment and Research Division, Bureau of Meteorology, Melbourne, Australia
David M. Kent
Environment and Research Division, Bureau of Meteorology, Melbourne, Australia
Andrew M. MacDonald
Environment and Research Division, Bureau of Meteorology, Melbourne, Australia
Margot E. Turner
Environment and Research Division, Bureau of Meteorology, Melbourne, Australia
Narendra K. Tuteja
Bureau of Meteorology, Canberra, Australia
Related authors
Hapu Arachchige Prasantha Hapuarachchi, Mohammed Abdul Bari, Aynul Kabir, Mohammad Mahadi Hasan, Fitsum Markos Woldemeskel, Nilantha Gamage, Patrick Daniel Sunter, Xiaoyong Sophie Zhang, David Ewen Robertson, James Clement Bennett, and Paul Martinus Feikema
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 4801–4821, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4801-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4801-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Methodology for developing an operational 7-day ensemble streamflow forecasting service for Australia is presented. The methodology is tested for 100 catchments to learn the characteristics of different NWP rainfall forecasts, the effect of post-processing, and the optimal ensemble size and bootstrapping parameters. Forecasts are generated using NWP rainfall products post-processed by the CHyPP model, the GR4H hydrologic model, and the ERRIS streamflow post-processor inbuilt in the SWIFT package
Justin Peter, Elisabeth Vogel, Wendy Sharples, Ulrike Bende-Michl, Louise Wilson, Pandora Hope, Andrew Dowdy, Greg Kociuba, Sri Srikanthan, Vi Co Duong, Jake Roussis, Vjekoslav Matic, Zaved Khan, Alison Oke, Margot Turner, Stuart Baron-Hay, Fiona Johnson, Raj Mehrotra, Ashish Sharma, Marcus Thatcher, Ali Azarvinand, Steven Thomas, Ghyslaine Boschat, Chantal Donnelly, and Robert Argent
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2755–2781, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2755-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2755-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We detail the production of datasets and communication to end users of high-resolution projections of rainfall, runoff, and soil moisture for the entire Australian continent. This is important as previous projections for Australia were for small regions and used differing techniques for their projections, making comparisons difficult across Australia's varied climate zones. The data will be beneficial for research purposes and to aid adaptation to climate change.
Richard Laugesen, Mark Thyer, David McInerney, and Dmitri Kavetski
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 873–893, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-873-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-873-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Forecasts may be valuable for user decisions, but current practice to quantify it has critical limitations. This study introduces RUV (relative utility value, a new metric that can be tailored to specific decisions and decision-makers. It illustrates how critical this decision context is when evaluating forecast value. This study paves the way for agencies to tailor the evaluation of their services to customer decisions and researchers to study model improvements through the lens of user impact.
David McInerney, Mark Thyer, Dmitri Kavetski, Richard Laugesen, Fitsum Woldemeskel, Narendra Tuteja, and George Kuczera
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5669–5683, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5669-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5669-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Streamflow forecasts a day to a month ahead are highly valuable for water resources management. Current practice often develops forecasts for specific lead times and aggregation timescales. In contrast, a single, seamless forecast can serve multiple lead times/timescales. This study shows seamless forecasts can match the performance of forecasts developed specifically at the monthly scale, while maintaining quality at other lead times. Hence, users need not sacrifice capability for performance.
Hapu Arachchige Prasantha Hapuarachchi, Mohammed Abdul Bari, Aynul Kabir, Mohammad Mahadi Hasan, Fitsum Markos Woldemeskel, Nilantha Gamage, Patrick Daniel Sunter, Xiaoyong Sophie Zhang, David Ewen Robertson, James Clement Bennett, and Paul Martinus Feikema
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 4801–4821, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4801-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4801-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Methodology for developing an operational 7-day ensemble streamflow forecasting service for Australia is presented. The methodology is tested for 100 catchments to learn the characteristics of different NWP rainfall forecasts, the effect of post-processing, and the optimal ensemble size and bootstrapping parameters. Forecasts are generated using NWP rainfall products post-processed by the CHyPP model, the GR4H hydrologic model, and the ERRIS streamflow post-processor inbuilt in the SWIFT package
Hoori Ajami, Ashish Sharma, Lawrence E. Band, Jason P. Evans, Narendra K. Tuteja, Gnanathikkam E. Amirthanathan, and Mohammed A. Bari
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 281–294, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-281-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-281-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
We present the first data-based framework for explaining why catchments behave in a non-stationary manner, even when they are unaffected by deforestation or urbanization. The role of vegetation dynamics in streamflow is indicated by similar or greater sensitivity of annual runoff ratio to annual fractional vegetation cover. We formulated a novel ecohydrologic catchment classification framework that incorporates the role of vegetation dynamics in catchment-scale water partitioning.
Related subject area
Subject: Global hydrology | Techniques and Approaches: Stochastic approaches
Revisiting the global hydrological cycle: is it intensifying?
Detection and attribution of flood trends in Mediterranean basins
Examining the relationship between intermediate-scale soil moisture and terrestrial evaporation within a semi-arid grassland
Investigation of hydrological time series using copulas for detecting catchment characteristics and anthropogenic impacts
Towards observation-based gridded runoff estimates for Europe
Historical land-use-induced evapotranspiration changes estimated from present-day observations and reconstructed land-cover maps
Detection of global runoff changes: results from observations and CMIP5 experiments
Rainfall statistics changes in Sicily
Spatial variability and its scale dependency of observed and modeled soil moisture over different climate regions
How extreme is extreme? An assessment of daily rainfall distribution tails
Impact of climate change on the stream flow of the lower Brahmaputra: trends in high and low flows based on discharge-weighted ensemble modelling
Climate model bias correction and the role of timescales
Streamflow trends in Europe: evidence from a dataset of near-natural catchments
Demetris Koutsoyiannis
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 3899–3932, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-3899-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-3899-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We overview and retrieve a great amount of global hydroclimatic data sets. We improve the quantification of the global hydrological cycle, its variability and its uncertainties through the surge of newly available data sets. We test (but do not confirm) established climatological hypotheses, according to which the hydrological cycle should be intensifying due to global warming. We outline a stochastic view of hydroclimate, which provides a reliable means of dealing with its variability.
Yves Tramblay, Louise Mimeau, Luc Neppel, Freddy Vinet, and Eric Sauquet
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 4419–4431, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4419-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4419-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
In the present study the flood trends have been assessed for a large sample of 171 basins located in southern France, which has a Mediterranean climate. Results show that, despite the increase in rainfall intensity previously observed in this area, there is no general increase in flood magnitude. Instead, a reduction in the annual number of floods is found, linked to a decrease in soil moisture caused by the increase in temperature observed in recent decades.
Raghavendra B. Jana, Ali Ershadi, and Matthew F. McCabe
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 3987–4004, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-3987-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-3987-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
Interactions between soil moisture and terrestrial evaporation affect responses between land surface and the atmosphere across scales. We present an analysis of the link between soil moisture and evaporation estimates from three distinct models. The relationships were examined over nearly 2 years of observation data. Results show that while direct correlations of raw data were mostly not useful, the root-zone soil moisture and the modelled evaporation estimates reflect similar distributions.
Takayuki Sugimoto, András Bárdossy, Geoffrey G. S. Pegram, and Johannes Cullmann
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 2705–2720, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-2705-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-2705-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
This paper is aims to detect the climate change impacts on the hydrological regime from the long-term discharge records. A new method for stochastic analysis using copulas, which has the advantage of scrutinizing the data independent of marginal, is suggested in this paper. Two measures are used in the copula domain: one focuses on the asymmetric characteristic of data and the other compares the distances between the copulas. These are calculated for 100 years of daily discharges and the results are discussed.
L. Gudmundsson and S. I. Seneviratne
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 2859–2879, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-2859-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-2859-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
Water storages and fluxes on land are key variables in the Earth system. To provide context for local investigations and to understand phenomena that emerge at large spatial scales, information on continental freshwater dynamics is needed. This paper presents a methodology to estimate continental-scale runoff on a 0.5° spatial grid, which combines the advantages of in situ observations with the power of machine learning regression. The resulting runoff estimates compare well with observations.
J. P. Boisier, N. de Noblet-Ducoudré, and P. Ciais
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 3571–3590, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-3571-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-3571-2014, 2014
R. Alkama, L. Marchand, A. Ribes, and B. Decharme
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 2967–2979, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-2967-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-2967-2013, 2013
E. Arnone, D. Pumo, F. Viola, L. V. Noto, and G. La Loggia
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 2449–2458, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-2449-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-2449-2013, 2013
B. Li and M. Rodell
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 1177–1188, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-1177-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-1177-2013, 2013
S. M. Papalexiou, D. Koutsoyiannis, and C. Makropoulos
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 851–862, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-851-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-851-2013, 2013
A. K. Gain, W. W. Immerzeel, F. C. Sperna Weiland, and M. F. P. Bierkens
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 1537–1545, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-1537-2011, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-1537-2011, 2011
J. O. Haerter, S. Hagemann, C. Moseley, and C. Piani
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 1065–1079, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-1065-2011, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-1065-2011, 2011
K. Stahl, H. Hisdal, J. Hannaford, L. M. Tallaksen, H. A. J. van Lanen, E. Sauquet, S. Demuth, M. Fendekova, and J. Jódar
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 2367–2382, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-2367-2010, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-2367-2010, 2010
Cited articles
ABS – Australian Bureau of Statistics: Year Book Australia 2012, http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats (last access: 7 August 2013), 2012.
Ajami, H., Sharma, A., Band, L. E., Evans, J. P., Tuteja, N. K., Amirthanathan, G. E., and Bari, M. A.: On the non-stationarity of hydrological response in anthropogenically unaffected catchments: An Australian perspective, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2016-353, in review, 2016.
Australian Government: Hydrologic Reference Stations (HRS), http://www.bom.gov.au/water/hrs, last access: September 2016.
Bawden, A. J., Linton, H. C., Burn, D. H., and Prowse, T. D.: A spatiotemporal analysis of hydrological trends and variability in the Athabasca River region, Canada, J. Hydrol., 509, 333–342, 2014.
Bayazit, M.: Nonstationarity of Hydrological Records and Recent Trends in Trend Analysis: A State-of-the-art Review, Environ. Process., 2, 527–542, 2015.
Biggs, E. M. and Atkinson, P. M.: A characterisation of climate variability and trends in hydrological extremes in the Severn Uplands, Int. J. Climatol., 31, 1634–1652, 2011.
Birsan, M. V., Molnar, P., Burlando, P., and Pfaundler, M.: Streamflow trends in Switzerland, J. Hydrol., 314, 312–329, 2005.
BOM – Bureau of Meteorology: Geospatial Data Unit: Australian Hydrological Geospatial Fabric (Geofabric) Product Guide, Version 3.0, p. 48, http://www.bom.gov.au/water/geofabric/documents/v3_0/ahgf_productguide_V3_0_release.pdf (last access: 15 September 2016), 2015.
BOM – Bureau of Meteorology: Annual Climate Report 2015, http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/annual_sum/2015/Annual-Climate-Report-2015-LR.pdf, last access: 20 June 2016.
BOM and CSIRO: State of the Climate 2014, The third report on Australia's climate by BOM and CSIRO, http://www.bom.gov.au/state-of-the-climate (last access: 13 March 2015), 2014.
Bormann, H., Pinter, N., and Elfert, S.: Hydrological signatures of flood trends on German rivers: flood frequencies, flood heights and specific stages, J. Hydrol., 404, 50–66, 2011.
Burn, D. H. and Hag Elnur, M. A.: Detection of hydrologic trends and variability, J. Hydrol., 255, 107–122, 2002.
Chiew, F. H. S. and McMahon, T. A.: Detection of trend or change in annual flow of Australian rivers, Int. J. Climatol., 13, 643–653, 1993.
Chiew, F. H. S. and Siriwardena, L.: TREND – trend/change detection software, CRC for Catchment Hydrology, http://www.toolkit.net.au/trend (last access: 24 October 2014), 2005.
Cleugh, H., Smith, M. S., Battaglia, M., and Graham, P. (Eds.): Climate change: science and solutions for Australia, CSIRO Publishing, Australia, p. 155, 2011.
CSIRO: Reports to the Australian Government from the CSIRO Sustainable Yields Project, CSIRO, Australia, 2015.
CSIRO and BOM: Climate Change in Australia Information for Australia's Natural Resource Management Regions, Technical Report, CSIRO and Bureau of Meteorology, Australia, 222 pp., http://www.climatechangeinaustralia.gov.au/ (last access: 15 April 2016), 2015.
Dixon, H., Lawler, D. M., and Shamseldin, A. Y.: Streamflow trends in western Britain, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L19406, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL027325, 2006.
Durrant, J. and Byleveld, S.: Streamflow trends in south-west Western Australia, Surface water hydrology series – Report no. HY32, Department of Water, Government of Western Australia, p. 79, https://www.water.wa.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0017/1592/87846.pdf (last access: 16 September 2016), 2009.
Finlayson, B. L. and McMahon, T. A.: Australia v. the world: a comparative analysis of streamflow characteristics, in: Fluvial Geomorphology of Australia, edited by: Warner, R. F., Academic Press, Sydney, 17–40, 1988.
Geoscience Australia: Australia's River Basins 1997: Product User Guide, National Mapping Division, Geoscience Australia, Canberra, 2004.
Haddad, K., Rahman, A., and Weinmann, P. E.: Streamflow data preparation for regional flood frequency analysis: Important Lessons from a case study, Proc. Water Down Under, 2008, 2558–2569, 2008.
Hannaford, J. and Buys, G.: Trends in seasonal river flow regimes in the UK, J. Hydrol., 475, 158–174, 2012.
Hannaford, J. and Marsh, T.: An assessment of trends in UK runoff and low flows using a network of undisturbed catchments, Int. J. Climatol., 26, 1237–1253, 2006.
Hannaford, J. and Marsh, T. J.: High-flow and flood trends in a network of undisturbed catchments in the UK, Int. J. Climatol., 28, 1325–1338, 2008.
Helsel, D. R. and Hirsch, R. M.: Statistical methods in water resources, USGS-TWRI Book 4, chap. A3, US Geological Survey, USA, 2002.
Hennessy, K., Fitzharris, B., Bates, B. C., Harvey, N., Howden, S. M., Hughes, L., Salinger, J., and Warrick, R.: Australia and New Zealand, in: Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability, Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Parry, M. L., Canziani, O. F., Palutikof, J. P., van der Linden, P. J., and Hanson, C. E., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 507–540, 2007.
IPCC: Climate Change 2014, Synthesis Report, in: Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Core Writing Team, Pachauri R. K., and Meyer, L. A., IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, 151 pp. 2014.
Ishak, E. H., Rahman, A., Westra, S., Sharma, A., and Kuczera, G.: Preliminary analysis of trends in Australian flood data, World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2010: Challenges of Change, 16–20 May 2010, Providence, RI, 115–124, 2010.
Ishak, E. H., Rahman, A., Westra, S., Sharma, A., and Kuczera, G.: Evaluating the non-stationarity of Australian annual maximum flood, J. Hydrol., 494, 134–145, 2013.
Jones, P. D., Lister, D. H., Wilby, R. L., and Kostopoulou, E.: Extended river flow reconstructions for England and Wales, 1865–2002, Int. J. Climatol., 26, 219–231, 2006.
Kendall, M. G.: Rank Correlation Measures, Charles Griffin, London, 1975.
Kumar, S., Merwade, V., Kam, J., and Thurner, K.: Streamflow trends in Indiana: Effects of long term persistence, precipitation and subsurface drains, J. Hydrol., 374, 171–183, 2009.
Kundzewicz, Z. W. and Robson, A.: Detecting Trend and Other Changes in Hydrological Data, World Climate Program – Water, WMO/UNESCO, WCDMP-45, WMO/TD 1013, WMO, Geneva, 158 pp., 2000.
Lins, H. F. and Slack, J. R.: Seasonal and regional characteristics of US streamflow trends in the United States from 1940 to 1999, Phys. Geogr., 26, 489–501, 2005.
Lyne, V. and Hollick, M.: Stochastic time-variable rainfall–runoff modelling, Institution of Engineers National Conference Publication No. 79/10, Proceedings of the Hydrology and Water Resources Symposium, 10–12 September 1979, Perth, 89–93, 1979.
MacDonald, N., Phillips, I. D., and Mayle, G.: Spatial and temporal variability of flood seasonality in Wales, Hydrol. Process., 24, 1806–1820, 2010.
Mann, H. B.: Non-parametric tests against trend, Econometrica, 13, 245–259, 1945.
McCabe, G. J. and Wolock, D. M.: A step increase in streamflow in the conterminous United States, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29, 2185, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL015999, 2002.
Miller, W. P. and Piechota, T. C.: Regional analysis of trend and step changes observed in hydroclimate variables around the Colorado River basin, J. Hydrometeorol., 9, 1020–1034, 2008.
Milly, P. C. D., Dunne, K. A., and Vecchia, A. V.: Global pattern of trends in streamflow and water availability in a changing climate, Nature, 438, 347–350, 2005.
Monk, W. A., Peters, D. L., Curry, A., and Baird, D. J.: Quantifying trends in indicator hydroecological variables for regime-based groups of Canadian rivers, Hydrol. Process., 25, 3086–3100, 2011.
Nathan, R. J. and McMahon, T. A.: Evaluation of automated techniques for base flow and recession analyses, Water Resour. Res., 26, 1465–1473, 1990.
Novotny, E. V. and Stefan, H. G.: Stream flow in Minnesota: indicator of climate change, J. Hydrol., 334, 319–333, 2007.
Perrin, C., Michel, C., and Andreassian, V.: Improvement of a parsimonious model for streamflow simulation, J. Hydrol., 279, 275–289, 2003.
Petrone, K. C., Hughes, J. D., Van Niel, T. G., and Silberstein, R. P.: Streamflow decline in Southwestern Australia, 1950–2008, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L11401, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL043102, 2010.
Petrow, T. and Merz, B.: Trends in flood magnitude, frequency and seasonality in Germany in the period 1951–2002, J. Hydrol., 371, 129–141, 2009.
Poff, N. L., Olden, J. D., Pepin, D. M., and Bledsoe, B. P.: Placing global stream flow variability in geographic and geomorphic contexts, River Res. Appl., 22, 149–166, 2006.
Puckridge, J. T., Sheldon, F., Walker, K. F., and Boulton, A. J.: Flow variability and the ecology of large rivers, Mar. Freshwater Res., 49, 55–72, 1998.
Pui, A., Lal, A., and Sharma, A.: How does the interdecadal pacific oscillation affect design floods in Australia?, Water Resour. Res., 47, W05554, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010WR009420, 2011.
Rao, A. R., Hamed, K. H., Chen, H. L.: Nonstationarities in Hydrologic and Environmental Time Series, in: Volume 45 of Water Science and Technology Library, Springer Science & Business Media, Springer Netherlands, 365 pp., https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0117-5, 2012.
Raupach, M. R., Briggs, P. R., Haverd, V., King, E. A., Paget, M., and Trudinger, C. M.: Australian Water Availability Project (AWAP): CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research Component: Final Report for Phase 3, CAWCR Technical Report No. 013, 67 pp., http://www.csiro.au/awap/doc/CTR_013_online_FINAL.pdf (last access: 17 September 2016), 2009.
SEACI – South Eastern Australian Climate Initiative: The Millennium Drought and 2010/11 Floods, SEACI factsheets, http://www.seaci.org/publications/documents/SEACI-2Reports/SEACI2_Factsheet2of4_WEB_110714.pdf (last access: 17 September 2016), 2011.
Sen, P. K.: Estimates of the regression coefficient based on Kendall's tau, J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 63, 1379–1389, 1968.
Silberstein, R. P., Aryal, S. K., Durrant, J., Pearcey, M., Braccia, M., Charles, S. P., Boniecka, L., Hodgson, G. A., Bari, M. A., Viney, N. R., and McFarlane, D. J.: Climate change and runoff in southwestern Australia, J. Hydrol., 475, 441–455, 2012.
SKM: Developing guidelines for the selection of streamflow gauging stations. Final Report, August 2010, Prepared for the Climate and Water Division, Bureau of Meteorology, 76 pp., http://www.bom.gov.au/water/hrs/media/static/papers/SKM2010_Report.pdf (last access: 17 September 2016), 2010.
Smettem, K. R. J., Waring, R. H., Callow, J. N., Wilson, M. S. S., and Mu, Q.: Satellite-derived estimates of forest leaf area index in southwest Western Australia are not tightly coupled to interannual variations in rainfall: implications for groundwater decline in a drying climate, Global Change Biol., 19, 2401–2412, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12223, 2013.
Stahl, K., Hisdal, H., Hannaford, J., Tallaksen, L. M., van Lanen, H. A. J., Sauquet, E., Demuth, S., Fendekova, M., and Jódar, J.: Streamflow trends in Europe: evidence from a dataset of near-natural catchments, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 2367–2382, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-2367-2010, 2010.
Stahl, K., Tallaksen, L. M., Hannaford, J., and van Lanen, H. A. J.: Filling the white space on maps of European runoff trends: estimates from a multi-model ensemble, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 2035–2047, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-2035-2012, 2012.
Stern, H., Hoedt, G., and Ernst, J.: Objective classification of Australian climates, Aust. Meteorol. Mag., 49, 87–96, 2000.
Stewardson, M. J. and Chiew, F.: A comparison of recent trends in gauged streamflows with climate change predictions in south east Australia, 18th World IMACS/MODSIM Congress, 13–17 July 2009, Cairns, Australia, 2009.
Theil, H.: A rank-invariant method of linear and polynomial regression analysis, I, II, III. Nederl. Akad. Wetensch., Proc., 53, 386–392, 521–525, 1397–1412, 1950.
Tran, H. and Ng, A.: Statistical trend analysis of river streamflows in Victoria, in: Proceedings of H2O09: 32nd Hydrology and Water Resources Symposium, 30 November–3 December 2009, Canberra, Australia, 1019–1027, 2009.
Turner, M., Bari, M., Amirthanathan, G., and Ahmad, Z.: Australian network of hydrologic reference stations – advances in design, development and implementation, 34th Hydrology and Water Resources Symposium, 19–22 November 2012, Sydney, Australia, in: Proceedings of Hydrology and Water Resources Symposium 2012, Engineers Australia, Barton, ACT, 1555–1564, 2012.
Ummenhofer, C. C., England, M. H., McIntosh, P. C., Meyers, G. A., Pook, M. J., Risbey, J. S., Gupta, A. S., and Taschetto, A. S.: What causes southeast Australia's worst droughts?, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L04706, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL036801, 2009.
Wang, W.: Stochasticity, Nonlinearity and Forecasting of Streamflow Processes, IOS Press, the Netherlands, 210 pp., 2006.
Water Act 2007: Department of Environment, Commonwealth of Australia, Start date: 3 March 2008, http://www.comlaw.gov.au/Series/C2007A00137 (last access: 8 August 2016), 2007.
WWAP – World Water Assessment Programme: The United Nations World Water Development Report 4: Managing Water under Uncertainty and Risk, UNESCO, Paris, 2012.
Zhang, X. S., Bari, M., Amirthanathan, G., Kent, D., MacDonald, A., and Shin, D.: Hydrologic Reference Stations to Monitor Climate-Driven Streamflow Variability and Trends, 35th Hydrology and Water Resources Symposium, 24–27 February 2014, Perth, Australia, in: Proceedings of Hydrology and Water Resources Symposium 2014, Engineers Australia, Barton, ACT, 1048–1055, 2014.
Zhang, Z., Dehoff, A. D., and Pody, R. D.: New approach to identify trend pattern of stream flows, J. Hydrol. Eng., 15, 244–248, 2010.
Short summary
The hydrologic reference stations website (www.bom.gov.au/water/hrs/), developed by the Australia Bureau of Meteorology, is a one-stop portal to access long-term and high-quality streamflow information for 222 stations across Australia. This study investigated the streamflow variability and inferred trends in water availability for those stations. The results present a systematic analysis of recent hydrological changes in Australian rivers, which will aid water management decision making.
The hydrologic reference stations website (www.bom.gov.au/water/hrs/), developed by the...
