Articles | Volume 18, issue 1
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 367–388, 2014
© Author(s) 2014. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Special issue: Hillslope hydrological modelling for landslides prediction
Research article 31 Jan 2014
Research article | 31 Jan 2014
Coupled prediction of flood response and debris flow initiation during warm- and cold-season events in the Southern Appalachians, USA
J. Tao and A. P. Barros
No articles found.
Rhae Sung Kim, Sujay Kumar, Carrie Vuyovich, Paul Houser, Jessica Lundquist, Lawrence Mudryk, Michael Durand, Ana Barros, Edward J. Kim, Barton A. Forman, Ethan D. Gutmann, Melissa L. Wrzesien, Camille Garnaud, Melody Sandells, Hans-Peter Marshall, Nicoleta Cristea, Justin M. Pflug, Jeremy Johnston, Yueqian Cao, David Mocko, and Shugong Wang
The Cryosphere, 15, 771–791,Short summary
High SWE uncertainty is observed in mountainous and forested regions, highlighting the need for high-resolution snow observations in these regions. Substantial uncertainty in snow water storage in Tundra regions and the dominance of water storage in these regions points to the need for high-accuracy snow estimation. Finally, snow measurements during the melt season are most needed at high latitudes, whereas observations at near peak snow accumulations are most beneficial over the midlatitudes.
Yajuan Duan, Markus D. Petters, and Ana P. Barros
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 1413–1437,Short summary
A new cloud parcel model that simulates entrainment, condensational growth, and collision–coalescence processes is presented and evaluated against airborne observations in complex terrain during IPHEx. Analysis of model simulations reveals that nonlinear interactions among turbulent dispersion, activation, and droplet growth processes modulate spectral width and explain the emergence of bimodal cloud drop spectra in aircraft measurements from different cloud regions and at different heights.
Yajuan Duan, Markus D. Petters, and Ana P. Barros
Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss.,
Revised manuscript not acceptedShort summary
To investigate aerosol-cloud interactions in cumulus development, a new cloud parcel model is developed to predict the vertical structure of cloud formation at early stages and evaluated against airborne observations during the Integrated Precipitation and Hydrology Experiment over the Southern Appalachian Mountains. The findings provide new insights into determinant factors of mid-day cumulus congestus formation that can explain a large fraction of warm season rainfall in mountainous regions.
Y. Duan, A. M. Wilson, and A. P. Barros
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 1501–1520,Short summary
A diagnostic analysis of the space-time structure of error in quantitative precipitation estimates (QPEs) from the precipitation radar on the Tropical Rainfall Measurement Mission satellite is presented here in preparation for the Integrated Precipitation and Hydrology Experiment (IPHEx) in 2014. A high-density raingauge network over the southern Appalachians allows for direct comparison between ground-based measurements and satellite-based QPE (PR 2A25 Version 7 with 5 years of data 2008-2013).
Related subject area
Subject: Hillslope hydrology | Techniques and Approaches: Modelling approachesEstimation of rainfall erosivity based on WRF-derived raindrop size distributionsPhysically based model for gully simulation: application to the Brazilian semiarid regionAssessing the perturbations of the hydrogeological regime in sloping fens due to roadsA review of the (Revised) Universal Soil Loss Equation ((R)USLE): with a view to increasing its global applicability and improving soil loss estimatesHybridizing Bayesian and variational data assimilation for high-resolution hydrologic forecastingMulti-source data assimilation for physically based hydrological modeling of an experimental hillslopeA new method, with application, for analysis of the impacts on flood risk of widely distributed enhanced hillslope storageTowards improved parameterization of a macroscale hydrologic model in a discontinuous permafrost boreal forest ecosystemReconstructing long-term gully dynamics in Mediterranean agricultural areasEvaluating performance of simplified physically based models for shallow landslide susceptibilityMultiresponse modeling of variably saturated flow and isotope tracer transport for a hillslope experiment at the Landscape Evolution ObservatoryDeterminants of modelling choices for 1-D free-surface flow and morphodynamics in hydrology and hydraulics: a reviewUse of satellite and modeled soil moisture data for predicting event soil loss at plot scaleQuantification of the influence of preferential flow on slope stability using a numerical modelling approachHydrological hysteresis and its value for assessing process consistency in catchment conceptual modelsDerivation and evaluation of landslide-triggering thresholds by a Monte Carlo approachStable water isotope tracing through hydrological models for disentangling runoff generation processes at the hillslope scaleAnalysis of landslide triggering conditions in the Sarno area using a physically based modelThe influence of grid resolution on the prediction of natural and road-related shallow landslidesIncipient subsurface heterogeneity and its effect on overland flow generation – insight from a modeling study of the first experiment at the Biosphere 2 Landscape Evolution ObservatoryPredicting subsurface stormflow response of a forested hillslope – the role of connected flow pathsInterplay of riparian forest and groundwater in the hillslope hydrology of Sudanian West Africa (northern Benin)A model-based assessment of the potential use of compound-specific stable isotope analysis in river monitoring of diffuse pesticide pollutionA paradigm shift in stormflow predictions for active tectonic regions with large-magnitude storms: generalisation of catchment observations by hydraulic sensitivity analysis and insight into soil-layer evolutionDerivation of critical rainfall thresholds for shallow landslides as a tool for debris flow early warning systemsStatistical analysis and modelling of surface runoff from arable fields in central EuropeHydrological modelling of a slope covered with shallow pyroclastic deposits from field monitoring dataPhysically based modeling of rainfall-triggered landslides: a case study in the Luquillo forest, Puerto RicoCharacterization of groundwater dynamics in landslides in varved claysA critical assessment of simple recharge models: application to the UK ChalkThe effect of spatial throughfall patterns on soil moisture patterns at the hillslope scaleSnow accumulation/melting model (SAMM) for integrated use in regional scale landslide early warning systemsSuspended sediment concentration–discharge relationships in the (sub-) humid Ethiopian highlandsA model of hydrological and mechanical feedbacks of preferential fissure flow in a slow-moving landslideScale effect on overland flow connectivity at the plot scalePhysical models for classroom teaching in hydrologyCoupling the modified SCS-CN and RUSLE models to simulate hydrological effects of restoring vegetation in the Loess Plateau of ChinaEffects of peatland drainage management on peak flowsA conceptual model of the hydrological influence of fissures on landslide activityA structure generator for modelling the initial sediment distribution of an artificial hydrologic catchmentA novel explicit approach to model bromide and pesticide transport in connected soil structuresQuantifying spatial and temporal discharge dynamics of an event in a first order stream, using distributed temperature sensingEffect of high-resolution spatial soil moisture variability on simulated runoff response using a distributed hydrologic modelA steady-state saturation model to determine the subsurface travel time (STT) in complex hillslopesComparison of algorithms and parameterisations for infiltration into organic-covered permafrost soils
Qiang Dai, Jingxuan Zhu, Shuliang Zhang, Shaonan Zhu, Dawei Han, and Guonian Lv
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 5407–5422,Short summary
Rainfall is a driving force that accounts for a large proportion of soil loss around the world. Most previous studies used a fixed rainfall–energy relationship to estimate rainfall energy, ignoring the spatial and temporal changes of raindrop microphysical processes. This study proposes a novel method for large-scale and long-term rainfall energy and rainfall erosivity investigations based on rainfall microphysical parameterization schemes in the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model.
Pedro Henrique Lima Alencar, José Carlos de Araújo, and Adunias dos Santos Teixeira
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 4239–4255,Short summary
Soil erosion by water has been emphasized as a key problem to be faced in the 21st century. Thus, it is critical to understand land degradation and to answer fundamental questions regarding how and why such processes occur. Here, we present a model for gully erosion (channels carved by rainwater) based on existing equations, and we identify some major variables that influence the initiation and evolution of this process. The successful model can help in planning soil conservation practices.
Fabien Cochand, Daniel Käser, Philippe Grosvernier, Daniel Hunkeler, and Philip Brunner
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 213–226,Short summary
Roads in sloping fens constitute a hydraulic barrier for surface and subsurface flow. This can lead to the drying out of downslope areas of the fen as well as gully erosion. By combining fieldwork and numerical models, this study presents an assessment of the hydrogeological impact of three road structures especially designed to limit their impact. The study shows that the impact of roads on the hydrological regime in fens can be significantly reduced by using appropriate engineering measures.
Rubianca Benavidez, Bethanna Jackson, Deborah Maxwell, and Kevin Norton
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 6059–6086,Short summary
Soil erosion is a global problem and models identify vulnerable areas for management. One such model is the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation. We review its different sub-factors and compile studies and equations that modified it for local conditions. The limitations of RUSLE include its data requirements and exclusion of gullying and landslides. Future directions include accounting for these erosion types. This paper serves as a reference for others working with RUSLE and related approaches.
Felipe Hernández and Xu Liang
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 5759–5779,Short summary
Predicting floods requires first knowing the amount of water in the valleys, which is complicated because we cannot know for sure how much water there is in the soil. We created a unique system that combines the best methods to estimate these conditions accurately based on the observed water flow in the rivers and on detailed simulations of the valleys. Comparisons with popular methods show that our system can produce realistic predictions efficiently, even for very detailed river networks.
Anna Botto, Enrica Belluco, and Matteo Camporese
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 4251–4266,Short summary
We present a multivariate application of the ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) in hydrological modeling of a real-world hillslope test case with dominant unsaturated dynamics and strong nonlinearities. Overall, the EnKF is able to correctly update system state and soil parameters. However, multivariate data assimilation may lead to significant tradeoffs between model predictions of different variables, if the observation data are not high quality or representative.
Peter Metcalfe, Keith Beven, Barry Hankin, and Rob Lamb
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 2589–2605,Short summary
Flooding is a significant hazard and extreme events in recent years have focused attention on effective means of reducing its risk. An approach known as natural flood management (NFM) seeks to increase flood resilience by a range of measures that work with natural processes. The paper develops a modelling approach to assess one type NFM of intervention – distributed additional hillslope storage features – and demonstrates that more strategic placement is required than has hitherto been applied.
Abraham Endalamaw, W. Robert Bolton, Jessica M. Young-Robertson, Don Morton, Larry Hinzman, and Bart Nijssen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 4663–4680,Short summary
This study applies plot-scale and hill-slope knowledge to a process-based mesoscale model to improve the skill of distributed hydrological models to simulate the spatially and basin-integrated hydrological processes of complex ecosystems in the sub-arctic boreal forest. We developed a sub-grid parameterization method to parameterize the surface heterogeneity of interior Alaskan discontinuous permafrost watersheds.
Antonio Hayas, Tom Vanwalleghem, Ana Laguna, Adolfo Peña, and Juan V. Giráldez
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 235–249,Short summary
Gully erosion is one of the most important erosion processes. In this study, we provide new data on gully dynamics over long timescales with an unprecedented temporal resolution. We apply a new Monte Carlo based method for calculating gully volumes based on orthophotos and, especially, for constraining uncertainties of these estimations. Our results show that gully erosion rates are highly variable from year to year and significantly higher than other erosion processes.
Giuseppe Formetta, Giovanna Capparelli, and Pasquale Versace
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 4585–4603,Short summary
This paper focuses on performance evaluation of simplified, physically based landslide susceptibility models. It presents a new methodology to systemically and objectively calibrate, verify, and compare different models and models performances indicators in order to individuate and select the models whose behavior is more reliable for a certain case study. The procedure was implemented in a package for landslide susceptibility analysis and integrated the open-source hydrological model NewAge.
Carlotta Scudeler, Luke Pangle, Damiano Pasetto, Guo-Yue Niu, Till Volkmann, Claudio Paniconi, Mario Putti, and Peter Troch
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 4061–4078,Short summary
Very few studies have applied a physically based hydrological model with integrated and distributed multivariate observation data of both flow and transport phenomena. In this study we address this challenge for a hillslope-scale unsaturated zone isotope tracer experiment. The results show how model complexity evolves as the number and detail of simulated responses increases. Possible gaps in process representation for simulating solute transport phenomena in very dry soils are discussed.
Bruno Cheviron and Roger Moussa
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 3799–3830,Short summary
This review paper investigates the determinants of modelling choices for numerous applications of 1-D free-surface flow and morphodynamics in hydrology and hydraulics. Each case study has a signature composed of given contexts (spatiotemporal scales, flow typology, and phenomenology) and chosen concepts (refinement and subscales of the flow model). This review proposes a normative procedure possibly enriched by the community for a larger, comprehensive and updated image of modelling strategies.
F. Todisco, L. Brocca, L. F. Termite, and W. Wagner
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 3845–3856,Short summary
We developed a new formulation of USLE, named Soil Moisture for Erosion (SM4E), that directly incorporates soil moisture information. SM4E is applied here by using modeled data and satellite observations obtained from the Advanced SCATterometer (ASCAT). SM4E is found to outperform USLE and USLE-MM models in silty–clay soil in central Italy. Through satellite data, there is the potential of applying SM4E for large-scale monitoring and quantification of the soil erosion process.
W. Shao, T. A. Bogaard, M. Bakker, and R. Greco
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 2197–2212,Short summary
The effect of preferential flow on the stability of landslides is studied through numerical simulation of two types of rainfall events on a hypothetical hillslope. A model is developed that consists of two parts. The first part is a model for combined saturated/unsaturated subsurface flow and is used to compute the spatial and temporal water pressure response to rainfall. Preferential flow is simulated with a dual-permeability continuum model consisting of a matrix/preferential flow domain.
O. Fovet, L. Ruiz, M. Hrachowitz, M. Faucheux, and C. Gascuel-Odoux
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 105–123,Short summary
We studied the annual hysteretic patterns observed between stream flow and water storage in the saturated and unsaturated zones of a hillslope and a riparian zone. We described these signatures using a hysteresis index and then used this to assess conceptual hydrological models. This led us to identify four hydrological periods and a clearly distinct behaviour between riparian and hillslope groundwaters and to provide new information about the model performances.
D. J. Peres and A. Cancelliere
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 4913–4931,Short summary
A Monte Carlo approach, combining rainfall-stochastic models and hydrological and slope stability physically based models, is used to derive rainfall thresholds of landslide triggering. The uncertainty in threshold assessment related to variability of rainfall intensity within events and to past rainfall (antecedent rainfall) is analyzed and measured via ROC-based indexes, with a specific focus dedicated to the widely used power-law rainfall intensity-duration (I-D) thresholds.
D. Windhorst, P. Kraft, E. Timbe, H.-G. Frede, and L. Breuer
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 4113–4127,
G. Capparelli and P. Versace
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 3225–3237,
D. Penna, M. Borga, G. T. Aronica, G. Brigandì, and P. Tarolli
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 2127–2139,
G.-Y. Niu, D. Pasetto, C. Scudeler, C. Paniconi, M. Putti, P. A. Troch, S. B. DeLong, K. Dontsova, L. Pangle, D. D. Breshears, J. Chorover, T. E. Huxman, J. Pelletier, S. R. Saleska, and X. Zeng
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 1873–1883,
J. Wienhöfer and E. Zehe
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 121–138,
A. Richard, S. Galle, M. Descloitres, J.-M. Cohard, J.-P. Vandervaere, L. Séguis, and C. Peugeot
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 5079–5096,
S. R. Lutz, H. J. van Meerveld, M. J. Waterloo, H. P. Broers, and B. M. van Breukelen
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 4505–4524,
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 4453–4470,
M. N. Papa, V. Medina, F. Ciervo, and A. Bateman
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 4095–4107,
P. Fiener, K. Auerswald, F. Winter, and M. Disse
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 4121–4132,
R. Greco, L. Comegna, E. Damiano, A. Guida, L. Olivares, and L. Picarelli
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 4001–4013,
C. Lepore, E. Arnone, L. V. Noto, G. Sivandran, and R. L. Bras
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 3371–3387,
J. E. van der Spek, T. A. Bogaard, and M. Bakker
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 2171–2183,
A. M. Ireson and A. P. Butler
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 2083–2096,
A. M. J. Coenders-Gerrits, L. Hopp, H. H. G. Savenije, and L. Pfister
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 1749–1763,
G. Martelloni, S. Segoni, D. Lagomarsino, R. Fanti, and F. Catani
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 1229–1240,
C. D. Guzman, S. A. Tilahun, A. D. Zegeye, and T. S. Steenhuis
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 1067–1077,
D. M. Krzeminska, T. A. Bogaard, J.-P. Malet, and L. P. H. van Beek
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 947–959,
A. Peñuela, M. Javaux, and C. L. Bielders
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 87–101,
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 3075–3082,
G. Y. Gao, B. J. Fu, Y. H. Lü, Y. Liu, S. Wang, and J. Zhou
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 2347–2364,
C. E. Ballard, N. McIntyre, and H. S. Wheater
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 2299–2310,
D. M. Krzeminska, T. A. Bogaard, Th. W. J. van Asch, and L. P. H. van Beek
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 1561–1576,
T. Maurer, A. Schneider, and H. H. Gerke
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 3617–3638,
J. Klaus and E. Zehe
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 2127–2144,
M. C. Westhoff, T. A. Bogaard, and H. H. G. Savenije
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 1945–1957,
J. Minet, E. Laloy, S. Lambot, and M. Vanclooster
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 1323–1338,
T. Sabzevari, A. Talebi, R. Ardakanian, and A. Shamsai
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 891–900,
Y. Zhang, S. K. Carey, W. L. Quinton, J. R. Janowicz, J. W. Pomeroy, and G. N. Flerchinger
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 729–750,
Allison, J. B., Hale, L. B., and Evans, S. T.: Soil survey of Haywood County area, North Carolina, [Washington, D.C.]: Natural Resources Conservation Service, 1997.
Arnone, E., Noto, L., Lepore, C., and Bras, R.: Physically-based and distributed approach to analyze rainfall-triggered landslides at watershed scale, Geomorphology, 133, 121–131, 2011.
Baum, R. and Godt, J.: Early warning of rainfall-induced shallow landslides and debris flows in the USA, Landslides, 7, 259–272, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-009-0177-0, 2010.
Baum, R., Savage, W., and Godt, J.: TRIGRS–a Fortran program for transient rainfall infiltration and grid–based regional slope–stability analysis. USGS Open File Report 02–0424, US Geological Survey, Reston, VA, available at: http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2002/ofr-02-424 (last access: 21 June 2013), 2002.
Baum, R. L., Coe, J. A., Godt, J. W., Harp, E. L., Reid, M. E., Savage, W. Z., Schulz, W. H., Brien, D. L., Chleborad, A. F., McKenna, J. P., and Michael, J. A.: Regional landslide-hazard assessment for Seattle, Washington, USA, Landslides, 2, 266–279, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-005-0023-y, 2005.
Baum, R. L., Godt, J. W., and Savage, W. Z.: Estimating the timing and location of shallow rainfall-induced landslides using a model for transient, unsaturated infiltration, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth Surface, 115, F3, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jf001321, 2010.
Bear, J.: Hydraulics of groundwater, New York : McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1979.
Berti, M., Martina, M. L. V., Franceschini, S., Pignone, S., Simoni, A., and Pizziolo, M.: Probabilistic rainfall thresholds for landslide occurrence using a Bayesian approach, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth Surface, 117, F4, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012jf002367, 2012.
Campbell, G. S.: A simple method for determining unsaturated conductivity from moisture retention data, Soil Sci., 117, 311–314, 1974.
Chow, V. T.: Open-Channel Hydraulics, McGraw-Hill Companies, 1959.
Clapp, R. B. and Hornberger, G. M.: Empirical equations for some soil hydraulic properties, Water Resour. Res., 14, 601–604, 1978.
Clark, G. M.: Debris slide and debris flow historical events in the Appalachians south of the glacial border, Debris flows/avalanches: Process, recognition, and mitigation: Geological Society of America Reviews in Engineering Geology, 7, 125–138, 1987.
Devonec, E. and Barros, A. P.: Exploring the transferability of a land-surface hydrology model, J. Hydrol., 265, 258–282, 2002.
Dickinson, R. E., Henderson-Sellers, A., and Kennedy, P. J.: Biosphere-Atmosphere Transfer Scheme (BATS) Version 1e as Coupled to the NCAR Community Climate Model, NCAR Technical Note: NCAR/TN-387 + STR, Climate and Global Dynamics Division, National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR), Boulder, Colorado, USA, 1993.
Dietrich, W. E., Wilson, C. J., Montgomery, D. R., and Mckean, J.: Analysis of Erosion Thresholds, Channel Networks, and Landscape Morphology Using a Digital Terrain Model, J. Geol., 101, 259–278, 1993.
Dutton, A. L., Loague, K., and Wemple, B. C.: Simulated effect of a forest road on near-surface hydrologic response and slope stability, Earth Surf. Process. Landf., 30, 325–338, https://doi.org/10.1002/Esp.1144, 2005.
Eklundha, L. and Jönssonb, P.: Timesat 3.1 Software Manual, Lund University, Sweden, 2012.
Fuhrmann, C. M., Konrad, C. E., and Band, L. E.: Climatological perspectives on the rainfall characteristics associated with landslides in western North Carolina, Phys. Geogr., 29, 289–305, 2008.
Fulton, R. A., Breidenbach, J. P., Seo, D. J., Miller, D. A., and O'Bannon, T.: The WSR-88D rainfall algorithm, Weather Forecast., 13, 377–395, 1998.
Godt, J. W., Baum, R. L., Savage, W. Z., Salciarini, D., Schulz, W. H., and Harp, E. I.: Transient deterministic shallow landslide modeling: Requirements for susceptibility and hazard assessments in a GIS framework, Eng. Geol., 102, 214–226, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2008.03.019, 2008.
Guzzetti, F., Peruccacci, S., Rossi, M., and Stark, C. P.: Rainfall thresholds for the initiation of landslides in central and southern Europe, Meteorol. Atmos. Phys., 98, 239–267, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-007-0262-7, 2007.
Hong, Y., Adler, R., and Huffman, G.: Use of satellite remote sensing data in the mapping of global landslide susceptibility, Nat. Hazards, 43, 245–256, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-006-9104-z, 2007.
Iverson, R. M.: Landslide triggering by rain infiltration, Water Resour. Res., 36, 1897–1910, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000wr900090, 2000.
Iverson, R. M., Reid, M. E., and LaHusen, R. G.: Debris-flow mobilization from landslides, Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci., 25, 1, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.earth.25.1.85, 1997.
Jackson, P. S.: On the displacement height in the logarithmic velocity profile, J. Fluid Mechan., 111, 15–25, 1981.
Kirschbaum, D. B., Adler, R., Hong, Y., Kumar, S., Peter-Lidard, C., and Lerner-Lam, A.: Advances in landslide nowcasting: evaluation of a global and regional modeling approach, Environ. Earth Sci., 66, 6, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-011-0990-3, 2011.
Lanni, C., Borga, M., Rigon, R., and Tarolli, P.: Modelling shallow landslide susceptibility by means of a subsurface flow path connectivity index and estimates of soil depth spatial distribution, Hydrol Earth Syst Sc, 16, 3959–3971, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-3959-2012, 2012.
Lee, L. G., Tanner, P. A., Horne, C. S., and Greer, S.: The Qualla Boundary Flash Flood of 14 and 15 July 2011, available at: http://www.erh.noaa.gov/er/gsp/localdat/cases/2011/14JulyQuallaBoundaryFF (last access: 21 June 2013), 2011.
Liao, Z., Hong, Y., Kirschbaum, D., Adler, R. F., Gourley, J. J., and Wooten, R.: Evaluation of TRIGRS (transient rainfall infiltration and grid-based regional slope-st ability analysis)'s predictive skill for hurricane-triggered landslides: a case study in Macon County, North Carolina, Nat Hazards, 58, 325–339, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-010-9670-y, 2011.
Lu, N. and Godt, J.: Infinite slope stability under steady unsaturated seepage conditions, Water Resour. Res., 44, 11, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008wr006976, 2008.
Mesinger, F., DiMego, G., Kalnay, E., Mitchell, K., Shafran, P. C., Ebisuzaki, W., Jovic, D., Woollen, J., Rogers, E., Berbery, E. H., Ek, M. B., Fan, Y., Grumbine, R., Higgins, W., Li, H., Lin, Y., Manikin, G., Parrish, D., and Shi, W.: North American regional reanalysis, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 87, 343–360, https://doi.org/10.1175/bams-87-3-343, 2006.
Milledge, D. G., Griffiths, D. V., Lane, S. N., and Warburton, J.: Limits on the validity of infinite length assumptions for modelling shallow landslides, Earth Surf. Process. Landf., 37, 1158–1166, https://doi.org/10.1002/Esp.3235, 2012.
Miller, J. A.: Ground water atlas of the United States, introduction and national summary, US Geol Surv, HA-730 (and volumes within the HA-730 series), available at: http://capp.water.usgs.gov/gwa/index.html (last access: 21 June 2013), 1999.
Mirus, B. B., Ebel, B. A., Loague, K., and Wemple, B. C.: Simulated effect of a forest road on near-surface hydrologic response: redux, Earth Surf. Process. Landf., 32, 126–142, https://doi.org/10.1002/Esp.1387, 2007.
Montgomery, D. R. and Dietrich, W. E.: A Physically-Based Model for the Topographic Control on Shallow Landsliding, Water Resour. Res., 30, 1153–1171, https://doi.org/10.1029/93wr02979, 1994.
Morrissey, M. M., Wieczorek, G. F., and Morgan, B. A.: A comparative analysis of simulated and observed landslide locations triggered by Hurricane Camille in Nelson County, Virginia, Hydrol. Process., 22, 524–531, https://doi.org/10.1002/Hyp.6882, 2008.
Ponce, V. M. and Yevjevich, V.: Muskingum-Cunge Method with Variable Parameters, J. Hydraul. Division-Asce, 104, 1663–1667, 1978.
Prat, O. P. and Barros, A. P.: Combining a Rain Microphysical Model and Observations: Implications for Radar Rainfall Estimation, in: 2009 Ieee Radar Conference, Vols 1 and 2, IEEE Radar Conference, 805–808, 2009.
Prat, O. P. and Barros, A. P.: Ground observations to characterize the spatial gradients and vertical structure of orographic precipitation – Experiments in the inner region of the Great Smoky Mountains, J. Hydrol., 391, 143–158, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.07.013, 2010.
Price, K., Jackson, C. R., and Parker, A. J.: Variation of surficial soil hydraulic properties across land uses in the southern Blue Ridge Mountains, North Carolina, USA, J. Hydrol., 383, 256–268, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.12.041, 2010.
Price, K., Jackson, C. R., Parker, A. J., Reitan, T., Dowd, J., and Cyterski, M.: Effects of watershed land use and geomorphology on stream low flows during severe drought conditions in the southern Blue Ridge Mountains, Georgia and North Carolina, United States, Water Resour. Res., 47, W02516, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010wr009340, 2011.
Radbruch-Hall, D. H., Colton, R. B., Davies, W. E., Lucchitta, I., Skipp, B. A., and Varnes, D. J.: Landslide overview map of the conterminous United States, US Government Printing Office, 1982.
Rawls, W. J., Brakensiek, D. L., and Saxton, K. E.: Estimation of Soil Water Properties, T. ASAE, 25, 1316–1320, 1982.
Rigon, R., Bertoldi, G., and Over, T. M.: GEOtop: A distributed hydrological model with coupled water and energy budgets, J. Hydrometeorol., 7, 371–388, https://doi.org/10.1175/Jhm497.1, 2006.
Rossi, G., Catani, F., Leoni, L., Segoni, S., and Tofani, V.: HIRESSS: a physically based slope stability simulator for HPC applications, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 151–166, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-151-2013, 2013.
Safaei, M., Omar, H., Huat, B. K., Yousof, Z. B. M., and Ghiasi, V.: Deterministic Rainfall Induced Landslide Approaches, Advantage and Limitation, Electron. J. Geotechn. Eng., 16, 1619–1650, 2011.
Salciarini, D., Godt, J. W., Savage, W. Z., Conversini, P., Baum, R. L., and Michael, J. A.: Modeling regional initiation of rainfall-induced shallow landslides in the eastern Umbria Region of central Italy, Landslides, 3, 181–194, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-006-0037-0, 2006.
Sas Jr., R. J. and Eaton, L. S.: Quartzite terrains, geologic controls, and basin denudation by debris flows: their role in long-term landscape evolution in the central Appalachians, Landslides, 5, 97–106, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-007-0108-x, 2008.
Saulnier, G. M., Beven, K., and Obled, C.: Including spatially variable effective soil depths in TOPMODEL, J. Hydrol., 202, 1, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-1694(97)00059-0, 1997.
Schwarz, G. and Alexander, R.: Soils data for the conterminous United States derived from the NRCS State Soil Geographic (STATSGO) data base, US Geological Survey Open-File Report, 95–449, 1995.
Sidle, R. C. and Wu, W. M.: Evaluation of the temporal and spatial impacts of timber harvesting on landslide occurrence, Water Sci. Appl., 2, 179–193, 2001.
Simoni, S., Zanotti, F., Bertoldi, G., and Rigon, R.: Modelling the probability of occurrence of shallow landslides and channelized debris flows using GEOtop-FS, Hydrol. Process., 22, 532–545, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6886, 2008.
Smith, J. A., Seo, D. J., Baeck, M. L., and Hudlow, M. D.: An intercomparison study of NEXRAD precipitation estimates, Water Resour. Res., 32, 2035–2045, 1996.
Tao, J. and Barros, A. P.: Prospects for Flash Flood Forecasting in Mountainous Regions–An Investigation of Tropical Storm Fay in the Southern Appalachians, J. Hydrol., 506, 69–89, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.02.052, 2013.
Tarolli, P. and Tarboton, D. G.: A new method for determination of most likely landslide initiation points and the evaluation of digital terrain model scale in terrain stability mapping, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 10, 663–677, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-10-663-2006, 2006.
Taylor, D. W.: Fundamentals of soil mechanics, J. Wiley, New York, 1948.
Trapp Jr., H. and Horn, M.: Ground Water Atlas of the United States: Delaware, Maryland, New Jersey, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia HA 730-L, US Geological Survey, 1997.
Vasiloff, S. V., Seo, D. J., Howard, K. W., Zhang, J., Kitzmiller, D. H., Mullusky, M. G., Krajewski, W. F., Brandes, E. A., Rabin, R. M., Berkowitz, D. S., Brooks, H. E., McGinley, J. A., Kuligowski, R. J., and Brown, B. G.: Improving QPE and very short term QPF: An initiative for a community-wide integrated approach, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 88, 1899–1911, https://doi.org/10.1175/bams-88-12-1899, 2007.
Wieczorek, G. F. and Morgan, B. A.: Debris-flow Hazards Within the Appalachian Mountains of the Eastern United States, US Geological Survey Fact Sheet 2008–3070, 4 p., available at: http://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2008/3070/ (last access: 21 June 2013), 2008.
Wieczorek, G. F., Mossa, G. S., and Morgan, B. A.: Regional debris-flow distribution and preliminary risk assessment from severe storm events in the Appalachian Blue Ridge Province, USA, Landslides, 1, 1, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-003-0003-z, 2004.
Wieczorek, G. F., Eaton, L. S., Morgan, B. A., Wooten, R., and Morrissey, M.: An examination of selected historical rainfall-Induced debris-flow events within the central and southern Appalachian Mountains of the eastern United States, US Geological Survey Open-File Report 2009–1155, 25 p., available at: http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2009/1155 (last access: 21 June 2013), 2009.
Witt, A. C.: A Brief History of Debris Flow Occurrence in the French Broad River Watershed, Western North Carolina, The North Carolina Geographer, 13, 59–82, 2005a.
Witt, A. C.: Using a GIS (Geographic Information System) to model slope instability and debris flow hazards in the French Broad River watershed, North Carolina, Master of Science, Marine, Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, North Carolina State University, 165 pp., 2005b.
Wooten, R. M., Gillon, K. A., Witt, A. C., Latham, R. S., Douglas, T. J., Bauer, J. B., Fuemmeler, S. J., and Lee, L. G.: Geologic, geomorphic, and meteorological aspects of debris flows triggered by Hurricanes Frances and Ivan during September 2004 in the Southern Appalachian Mountains of Macon County, North Carolina (southeastern USA), Landslides, 5, 31–44, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-007-0109-9, 2008.
Wooten, R. M., Gillon, K. A., Douglas, T. J., Witt, A. C., Bauer, J. B., and Fuemmeler, S. J.: Report on the January 7, 2009, Bear Trail debris flow, Haywood County, North Carolina, North Carolina Geological Survey, Division of Land Resources, Department of Environment and Natural Resources, 2009.
Wu, W. M. and Sidle, R. C.: A distributed slope stability model for steep forested basins, Water Resour. Res., 31, 8, https://doi.org/10.1029/95wr01136, 1995.
Yildiz, O. and Barros, A. P.: Climate Variability and Hydrologic Extremes-Modeling the Water and Energy Budgets in the Monongahela River Basin, Climate and Hydrology in Mountain Areas, Wiley, 2005.
Yildiz, O. and Barros, A. P.: Elucidating vegetation controls on the hydroclimatology of a mid-latitude basin, J. Hydrol., 333, 431–448, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.09.010, 2007.
Yildiz, O. and Barros, A. P.: Evaluating spatial variability and scale effects on hydrologic processes in a midsize river basin, Scient. Res. Essays, 4, 217–225, 2009.
Young, C. B., Nelson, B. R., Bradley, A. A., Smith, J. A., Peters-Lidard, C. D., Kruger, A., and Baeck, M. L.: An evaluation of NEXRAD precipitation estimates in complex terrain, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 104, 19691–19703, 1999.
Zhang, J., Howard, K., Langston, C., Vasiloff, S., Kaney, B., Arthur, A., Van Cooten, S., Kelleher, K., Kitzmiller, D., Ding, F., Seo, D.-J., Wells, E., and Dempsey, C.: National Mosaic and Multi-Sensor QPE (NMQ) System: Description, Results, and Future Plans, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 92, 1321–1338, https://doi.org/10.1175/2011bams-d-11-00047.1, 2011.