Articles | Volume 18, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-243-2014
© Author(s) 2014. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.Special issue:
Just two moments! A cautionary note against use of high-order moments in multifractal models in hydrology
Download
- Final revised paper (published on 17 Jan 2014)
- Preprint (discussion started on 11 Apr 2013)
Interactive discussion
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
- Printer-friendly version
- Supplement
-
RC C2052: 'Interactive comment on: "Just two moments! A cautionary note against use of high-order moments in multifractal models in hydrology" by Lombardo et al.', Fahim Ashkar, 28 May 2013
- AC C2372: 'Reply to Fahim Ashkar', Federico Lombardo, 08 Jun 2013
- SC C2416: 'Short comment', David Rupp, 11 Jun 2013
- AC C2811: 'Reply to David Rupp', Federico Lombardo, 25 Jun 2013
-
RC C3039: 'Comment on “Just two moments! A cautionary note against use of high-order moments in multifractal models in hydrology” by F. Lombardo et al.', Pierluigi Furcolo, 05 Jul 2013
- AC C5386: 'Reply to Pierluigi Furcolo', Federico Lombardo, 04 Oct 2013
-
SC C3103: 'Multifractality: at least three moments !', Daniel Schertzer, 09 Jul 2013
- AC C5387: 'Reply to “Multifractality: at least three moments!”', Federico Lombardo, 04 Oct 2013
-
SC C3181: 'Monofractal limitations of Climactograms', Shaun Lovejoy, 15 Jul 2013
- AC C5397: 'Is consistency a limitation? — Reply to “Further (monofractal) limitations of climactograms”', Federico Lombardo, 04 Oct 2013