Articles | Volume 15, issue 10
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 3153–3170, 2011
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-3153-2011
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 3153–3170, 2011
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-3153-2011

Research article 18 Oct 2011

Research article | 18 Oct 2011

Subsurface lateral flow from hillslope and its contribution to nitrate loading in streams through an agricultural catchment during subtropical rainstorm events

B. Zhang et al.

Related subject area

Subject: Hillslope hydrology | Techniques and Approaches: Instruments and observation techniques
Characterising hillslope–stream connectivity with a joint event analysis of stream and groundwater levels
Daniel Beiter, Markus Weiler, and Theresa Blume
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 5713–5744, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-5713-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-5713-2020, 2020
Short summary
Structural and functional control of surface-patch to hillslope runoff and sediment connectivity in Mediterranean dry reclaimed slope systems
Mariano Moreno-de-las-Heras, Luis Merino-Martín, Patricia M. Saco, Tíscar Espigares, Francesc Gallart, and José M. Nicolau
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 2855–2872, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-2855-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-2855-2020, 2020
Short summary
Distinct stores and the routing of water in the deep critical zone of a snow-dominated volcanic catchment
Alissa White, Bryan Moravec, Jennifer McIntosh, Yaniv Olshansky, Ben Paras, R. Andres Sanchez, Ty P. A. Ferré, Thomas Meixner, and Jon Chorover
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 4661–4683, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4661-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4661-2019, 2019
Short summary
Hydrological trade-offs due to different land covers and land uses in the Brazilian Cerrado
Jamil A. A. Anache, Edson Wendland, Lívia M. P. Rosalem, Cristian Youlton, and Paulo T. S. Oliveira
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 1263–1279, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-1263-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-1263-2019, 2019
Short summary
A sprinkling experiment to quantify celerity–velocity differences at the hillslope scale
Willem J. van Verseveld, Holly R. Barnard, Chris B. Graham, Jeffrey J. McDonnell, J. Renée Brooks, and Markus Weiler
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 5891–5910, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-5891-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-5891-2017, 2017
Short summary

Cited articles

Allaire, S. E., Roulier, S., and Cessna, A. J.: Quantifying preferential flow in soils: A review of different techniques, J. Hydrol., 378, 179–204, 2009.
Anderson, M. G. and Burt, T. P.: The contribution of throughflow to storm runoff: an evaluation of a chemical mixing model, Earth Surf. Proc. Land., 33, 211–225, 1982.
Bishop, K., Seibert, J., Kohler, S., and Laudon, H.: Resolving the double paradox of rapidly mobilized old water with highly variable responses in runoff chemistry, Hydrol. Process., 18, 185–189, 2004.
Boyer, E. W., Hornberger, G. M., Bencala, K. E., and McKnight, D. M.: Response characteristics of DOC flushing in an alpine catchment, Hydrol. Process., 11, 1635–1647, 1997.
Bronstert, A. and Plate, E. J.: Modelling of runoff generation and soil moisture dynamics for hillslopes and micro-catchments, J. Hydrol., 198, 177–195, 1997.