Articles | Volume 30, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-2579-2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-2579-2026
Research article
 | 
04 May 2026
Research article |  | 04 May 2026

On the gap between crop and land surface models: comparing irrigation and other land surface estimates from AquaCrop and Noah-MP over the Po Valley

Louise Busschaert, Michel Bechtold, Sara Modanesi, Christian Massari, Dirk Raes, Sujay V. Kumar, and Gabriëlle J. M. De Lannoy

Viewed

Total article views: 5,722 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
4,034 1,496 192 5,722 120 166
  • HTML: 4,034
  • PDF: 1,496
  • XML: 192
  • Total: 5,722
  • BibTeX: 120
  • EndNote: 166
Views and downloads (calculated since 01 Jul 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 01 Jul 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 5,722 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 5,596 with geography defined and 126 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Saved (final revised paper)

Latest update: 14 Aug 2026
Download
Short summary
Two models, AquaCrop (crop model) and Noah-MP (land surface model), were compared estimating irrigation in Italy's Po Valley. Noah-MP simulated higher water use (434 mm/yr) than AquaCrop (268 mm/yr), mainly due to extra water losses like runoff. Once losses were accounted for, both aligned with basin-scale reports of around 500 to 600 mm/yr. The study highlights how complex irrigation modeling is, and the need for better observational data to validate results.
Share