Articles | Volume 30, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-2579-2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-2579-2026
Research article
 | 
04 May 2026
Research article |  | 04 May 2026

On the gap between crop and land surface models: comparing irrigation and other land surface estimates from AquaCrop and Noah-MP over the Po Valley

Louise Busschaert, Michel Bechtold, Sara Modanesi, Christian Massari, Dirk Raes, Sujay V. Kumar, and Gabriëlle J. M. De Lannoy

Viewed

Total article views: 6,147 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
4,284 1,623 240 6,147 163 214
  • HTML: 4,284
  • PDF: 1,623
  • XML: 240
  • Total: 6,147
  • BibTeX: 163
  • EndNote: 214
Views and downloads (calculated since 01 Jul 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 01 Jul 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 6,147 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 6,000 with geography defined and 147 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Saved (final revised paper)

Latest update: 25 Sep 2026
Download
Short summary
Two models, AquaCrop (crop model) and Noah-MP (land surface model), were compared estimating irrigation in Italy's Po Valley. Noah-MP simulated higher water use (434 mm/yr) than AquaCrop (268 mm/yr), mainly due to extra water losses like runoff. Once losses were accounted for, both aligned with basin-scale reports of around 500 to 600 mm/yr. The study highlights how complex irrigation modeling is, and the need for better observational data to validate results.
Share