Brutsaert, W.: Hydrology: An Introduction (2nd ed.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, ISBN 9781107135277, 2023. a
Butz, M. V., Bilkey, D., Humaidan, D., Knott, A., and Otte, S.: Learning, planning, and control in a monolithic neural event inference architecture, Neural Networks, 117, 135–144,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2019.05.001, 2019.
a
Butz, M. V., Mittenbühler, M., Schwöbel, S., Achimova, A., Gumbsch, C., Otte, S., and Kiebel, S.: Contextualizing predictive minds, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 168, 105948,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105948, 2025.
a
Camporese, M. and Girotto, M.: Recent advances and opportunities in data assimilation for physics-based hydrological modeling, Frontiers in Water, 4, 948832,
https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2022.948832, 2022.
a
Chen, S., Zwart, J. A., and Jia, X.: Physics-Guided Graph Meta Learning for Predicting Water Temperature and Streamflow in Stream Networks, in: KDD 22: The 28th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, KDD, 22, 2752–2761, ISBN 9781450393850,
https://doi.org/10.1145/3534678.3539115, 2022.
a
Cho, K., van Merrienboer, B., Bahdanau, D., and Bengio, Y.: On the Properties of Neural Machine Translation: Encoder–Decoder Approaches, in: Proceedings of SSST-8, Eighth Workshop on Syntax, Semantics and Structure in Statistical Translation,
https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/w14-4012, 2014.
a
Copernicus Climate Change Service, Climate Data Store: ERA5 hourly data on single levels from 1940 to present, Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) Climate Data Store (CDS),
https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.adbb2d47, 2023.
a
EU-DEM: EU-DEM v1.1, Dataset,
https://land.copernicus.eu/imagery-in-situ/eu-dem/eu-dem-v1.1 (last access: 6 September 2023), 2016. a
Gauch, M., Kratzert, F., Klotz, D., Nearing, G., Lin, J., and Hochreiter, S.: Rainfall–runoff prediction at multiple timescales with a single Long Short-Term Memory network, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 2045–2062,
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-2045-2021, 2021.
a
Gigi, Y., Elidan, G., Hassidim, A., Matias, Y., Moshe, Z., Nevo, S., Shalev, G., and Wiesel, A.: Towards global remote discharge estimation: Using the few to estimate the many, arXiv [preprint],
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1901.00786, 2019.
a
Gillies, S. and others: Rasterio: geospatial raster I/O for Python programmers, GitHub,
https://github.com/rasterio/rasterio (last access: 21 June 2024), 2013. a
GRDC: Global Runoff Data Centre,
https://grdc.bafg.de/ (last access: 22 October 2024), 2024. a
Gupta, H. V., Kling, H., Yilmaz, K. K., and Martinez, G. F.: Decomposition of the mean squared error and NSE performance criteria: Implications for improving hydrological modelling, Journal of Hydrology, 377, 80–91,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.08.003, 2009.
a,
b
Hoedt, P.-J., Kratzert, F., Klotz, D., Halmich, C., Holzleitner, M., Nearing, G., Hochreiter, S., and Klambauer, G.: MC-LSTM: Mass-Conserving LSTM, Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, arXiv [preprint],
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2101.05186, 2021.
a
Höge, M., Scheidegger, A., Baity-Jesi, M., Albert, C., and Fenicia, F.: Improving hydrologic models for predictions and process understanding using neural ODEs, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5085–5102,
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5085-2022, 2022.
a
Hrachowitz, M., Savenije, H., Blöschl, G., McDonnell, J., Sivapalan, M., Pomeroy, J., Arheimer, B., Blume, T., Clark, M., Ehret, U., Fenicia, F., Freer, J., Gelfan, A., Gupta, H., Hughes, D., Hut, R., Montanari, A., Pande, S., Tetzlaff, D., Troch, P., Uhlenbrook, S., Wagener, T., Winsemius, H., Woods, R., Zehe, E., and Cudennec, C.: A decade of Predictions in Ungauged Basins (PUB) –a review, Hydrological Sciences Journal, 58, 1198–1255,
https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2013.803183, 2013.
a,
b
Hunter, N. M., Bates, P. D., Horritt, M. S., and Wilson, M. D.: Simple spatially-distributed models for predicting flood inundation: A review, Geomorphology, 90, 208–225, 2007. a
Imhoff, R., Van Verseveld, W., Van Osnabrugge, B., and Weerts, A.: Scaling point-scale (pedo) transfer functions to seamless large-domain parameter estimates for high-resolution distributed hydrologic modeling: An example for the Rhine River, Water Resources Research, 56, e2019WR026807,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR026807, 2020.
a
Imhoff, R. O., Brauer, C. C., van Heeringen, K.-J., Uijlenhoet, R., and Weerts, A. H.: Large-sample evaluation of radar rainfall nowcasting for flood early warning, Water Resources Research, 58, e2021WR031591,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR031591, 2022.
a
Karlbauer, M., Otte, S., Lensch, H., Scholten, T., Wulfmeyer, V., and Butz, M. V.: A distributed neural network architecture for robust non-linear spatio-temporal prediction, arXiv [preprint],
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1912.11141, 2019.
a
Klotz, D., Kratzert, F., Gauch, M., Keefe Sampson, A., Brandstetter, J., Klambauer, G., Hochreiter, S., and Nearing, G.: Uncertainty estimation with deep learning for rainfall–runoff modeling, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 1673–1693,
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1673-2022, 2022.
a
Kratzert, F., Klotz, D., Brenner, C., Schulz, K., and Herrnegger, M.: Rainfall–runoff modelling using Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 6005–6022,
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-6005-2018, 2018.
a,
b
Kratzert, F., Klotz, D., Shalev, G., Klambauer, G., Hochreiter, S., and Nearing, G.: Towards learning universal, regional, and local hydrological behaviors via machine learning applied to large-sample datasets, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 5089–5110,
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-5089-2019, 2019.
a,
b
Kratzert, F., Klotz, D., Gauch, M., Klingler, C., Nearing, G., and Hochreiter, S.: Large-scale river network modeling using Graph Neural Networks, in: EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts, EGU21–13375,
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu21-13375, 2021.
a
Liu, Y. and Gupta, H. V.: Uncertainty in hydrologic modeling: Toward an integrated data assimilation framework, Water Resources Research, Volume 43, Issue 7,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR005756, 2007.
a
Liu, Y., Weerts, A. H., Clark, M., Hendricks Franssen, H.-J., Kumar, S., Moradkhani, H., Seo, D.-J., Schwanenberg, D., Smith, P., van Dijk, A. I. J. M., van Velzen, N., He, M., Lee, H., Noh, S. J., Rakovec, O., and Restrepo, P.: Advancing data assimilation in operational hydrologic forecasting: progresses, challenges, and emerging opportunities, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 3863–3887,
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-3863-2012, 2012.
a,
b
Liu, Z., Mao, H., Wu, C.-Y., Feichtenhofer, C., Darrell, T., and Xie, S.: A ConvNet for the 2020s, in: 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR),
https://doi.org/10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.01167, 2022.
a
Longyang, Q., Choi, S., Tennant, H., Hill, D., Ashmead, N., Neilson, B. T., Newell, D. L., McNamara, J. P., and Xu, T.: Explainable Spatially Distributed Hydrologic Modeling of a Snow Dominated Mountainous Karst Watershed Using Attention, Authorea Preprints,
https://doi.org/10.22541/essoar.171536019.93198716/v1, 2024.
a
Montzka, C., Pauwels, V. R., Franssen, H.-J. H., Han, X., and Vereecken, H.: Multivariate and multiscale data assimilation in terrestrial systems: A review, Sensors, 12, 16291–16333, 2012. a
Moradkhani, H., Hsu, K.-L., Gupta, H., and Sorooshian, S.: Uncertainty assessment of hydrologic model states and parameters: Sequential data assimilation using the particle filter, Water Resources Research, Volume 41, Issue 5, Article number W05012,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2004WR003604, 2005.
a
Moshe, Z., Metzger, A., Kratzert, F., Morin, E., Nevo, S., Elidan, G., and Elyaniv, R.: HydroNets: Leveraging River Network Structure and Deep Neural Networks for Hydrologic Modeling , EGU General Assembly 2020, Online, 4–8 May 2020, EGU2020-4135,
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-4135, 2020.
a
Muñoz-Carpena, R., Carmona-Cabrero, A., Yu, Z., Fox, G., and Batelaan, O.: Convergence of mechanistic modeling and artificial intelligence in hydrologic science and engineering, PLOS Water, 2, e0000059,
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pwat.0000212, 2023.
a
Nash, J. E. and Sutcliffe, J. V.: River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I–A discussion of principles, Journal of Hydrology, 10, 282–290, 1970. a
Nearing, G., Kratzert, F., Sampson, A. K., Pelissier, C., Klotz, D., Frame, J., Prieto, C., and Gupta, H.: What Role Does Hydrological Science Play in the Age of Machine Learning?, Water Resources Research, 57, e2020WR028091,
https://doi.org/10.31223/osf.io/3sx6g, 2020.
a,
b,
c
Oddo, P. C., Bolten, J. D., Kumar, S. V., and Cleary, B.: Deep Convolutional LSTM for improved flash flood prediction, Frontiers in Water, 6, 1346104,
https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2024.1346104, 2024.
a
Palmer, M. A., Reidy Liermann, C. A., Nilsson, C., Flörke, M., Alcamo, J., Lake, P. S., and Bond, N.: Climate change and the world's river basins: anticipating management options, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 6, 81–89, 2008.
a,
b
Paszke, A., Gross, S., Massa, F., Lerer, A., Bradbury, J., Chanan, G., Killeen, T., Lin, Z., Gimelshein, N., Antiga, L., Desmaison, A., Kopf, A., Yang, E., DeVito, Z., Raison, M., Tejani, A., Chilamkurthy, S., Steiner, B., Fang, L., Bai, J., and Chintala, S.: PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 12,
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1912.01703, 2019.
a
Pilon, P. J.: Guidelines for reducing flood losses, Tech. rep., United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (UNISDR),
https://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/publications/flood_guidelines.pdf (last access: 11 November 2025), 2002. a
RADOLAN: RADOLAN/RADVOR,
https://opendata.dwd.de/climate_environment/CDC/grids_germany/hourly/radolan/(last access: 6 September 2023), 2016. a
Rakovec, O., Weerts, A. H., Hazenberg, P., Torfs, P. J. J. F., and Uijlenhoet, R.: State updating of a distributed hydrological model with Ensemble Kalman Filtering: effects of updating frequency and observation network density on forecast accuracy, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 3435–3449,
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-3435-2012, 2012.
a
Samaniego, L., Kumar, R., and Attinger, S.: Multiscale parameter regionalization of a grid-based hydrologic model at the mesoscale, Water Resources Research, 46, W05523,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR007327, 2010.
a
Scholz, F., Traub, M., Zarfl, C., Scholten, T., and Butz, M. V.: Fully differentiable, fully distributed River Discharge Prediction: data sets, Zenodo [data set],
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13970575, 2024a.
a
Scholz, F., Traub, M., Zarfl, C., Scholten, T., and Butz, M. V.: Fully differentiable, fully distributed River Discharge Prediction: code, Zenodo [code],
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13992583, 2024b.
a
Shen, C.: A transdisciplinary review of deep learning research and its relevance for water resources scientists, Water Resources Research, 54, 8558–8593, 2018.
a,
b,
c,
d
Shen, C., Appling, A. P., Gentine, P., Bandai, T., Gupta, H., Tartakovsky, A., Baity-Jesi, M., Fenicia, F., Kifer, D., Li, L., Liu, X., Ren, W., Zheng, Y., Harman, C. J., Clark, M., Farthing, M., Feng, D., Kumar, P., Aboelyazeed, D., Rahmani, F., Song, Y., Beck, H. E., Bindas, T., Dwivedi, D., Fang, K., Höge, M., Rackauckas, C., Mohanty, B., Roy, T., Xu, C., and Lawson, K.: Differentiable modelling to unify machine learning and physical models for geosciences, Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 4, 552–567,
https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-023-00450-9, 2023.
a
Shi, X., Chen, Z., Wang, H., Yeung, D.-Y., Wong, W.-k., and Woo, W.-c.: Convolutional LSTM Network: A Machine Learning Approach for Precipitation Nowcasting, Advances in neural information processing systems, arXiv [preprint],
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1506.04214, 2015.
a
Simonyan, K., Vedaldi, A., and Zisserman, A.: Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Maps, arXiv [preprint],
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1312.6034, 2013.
a
Sit, M., Demiray, B., Xiang, Z., Ewing, G., Sermet, Y., and Demir, I.: A Comprehensive Review of Deep Learning Applications in Hydrology and Water Resources,
https://doi.org/10.31223/osf.io/xs36g, 2020.
a,
b,
c,
d
Sun, A. Y., Jiang, P., Yang, Z.-L., Xie, Y., and Chen, X.: A graph neural network (GNN) approach to basin-scale river network learning: the role of physics-based connectivity and data fusion, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5163–5184,
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5163-2022, 2022.
a
Traub, M., Becker, F., Sauter, A., Otte, S., and Butz, M. V.: Loci-segmented: improving scene segmentation learning, in: International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks, 45–61, Springer,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-72338-4_4, 2024.
a
Tyson, C., Longyang, Q., Neilson, B. T., Zeng, R., and Xu, T.: Effects of meteorological forcing uncertainty on high-resolution snow modeling and streamflow prediction in a mountainous karst watershed, Journal of Hydrology, 619, 129304,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129304, 2023.
a
Ueda, F., Tanouchi, H., Egusa, N., and Yoshihiro, T.: A Transfer Learning Approach Based on Radar Rainfall for River Water-Level Prediction, Water, 16, 607,
https://doi.org/10.3390/w16040607, 2024.
a
Ufrecht, W.: Hydrogeologische Modelle – ein Leitfaden mit Fallbeispielen, Schriftenreihe der Deutschen Geologischen Gesellschaft, 24, Schweizerbart Science Publishers, Stuttgart, Germany,
http://www.schweizerbart.de//publications/detail/artno/171902400/Schriftenreihe_der_Dt_Ges_f_Geowissen (last access: 11 November 2025), 2002.
a,
b
Valeriano, O. C. S., Koike, T., Yang, K., and Yang, D.: Optimal dam operation during flood season using a distributed hydrological model and a heuristic algorithm, Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 15, 580–586, 2010. a
Van Vliet, M. T., Franssen, W. H., Yearsley, J. R., Ludwig, F., Haddeland, I., Lettenmaier, D. P., and Kabat, P.: Global river discharge and water temperature under climate change, Global Environmental Change, 23, 450–464, 2013. a
Wang, C., Jiang, S., Zheng, Y., Han, F., Kumar, R., Rakovec, O., and Li, S.: Distributed Hydrological Modeling With Physics-Encoded Deep Learning: A General Framework and Its Application in the Amazon, Water Resources Research, 60, e2023WR036170,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2023WR036170, 2024.
a
Wright, L.: Ranger – a synergistic optimizer, GitHub,
https://github.com/lessw2020/Ranger-Deep-Learning-Optimizer (last access: 22 August 2024), 2019. a
Xiang, Z. and Demir, I.: Distributed long-term hourly streamflow predictions using deep learning – A case study for State of Iowa, Environmental Modelling & Software, 131, 104761,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2020.104761, 2020.
a
Xu, T., Longyang, Q., Tyson, C., Zeng, R., and Neilson, B. T.: Hybrid physically based and deep learning modeling of a snow dominated, mountainous, karst watershed, Water Resources Research, 58, e2021WR030993,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR030993, 2022.
a
Yadan, O.: Hydra – A framework for elegantly configuring complex applications, Github,
https://github.com/facebookresearch/hydra (last access: 28 October 2024), 2019. a
Zhong, L., Lei, H., Li, Z., and Jiang, S.: Advancing streamflow prediction in data-scarce regions through vegetation-constrained distributed hybrid ecohydrological models, Journal of Hydrology, 645, 132165,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.132165, 2024.
a
Zhu, S., Wei, J., Zhang, H., Xu, Y., and Qin, H.: Spatiotemporal deep learning rainfall-runoff forecasting combined with remote sensing precipitation products in large scale basins, Journal of Hydrology, 616, 128727,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128727, 2023.
a
