Cheng, M., Fang, F., Kinouchi, T., Navon, I., and Pain, C.: Long lead-time daily and monthly streamflow forecasting using machine learning methods, J. Hydrol., 590, 125376,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125376, 2020.
a
Cho, K., van Merrienboer, B., Gulcehre, C., Bahdanau, D., Bougares, F., Schwenk, H., and Bengio, Y.: Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation, in: Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), Association for Computational Linguistics, 1724–1734,
https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/D14-1179, 2014.
a,
b,
c
Chung, J., Gulcehre, C., Cho, K., and Bengio, Y.: Empirical Evaluation of Gated Recurrent Neural Networks on Sequence Modeling, arXiv [preprint,
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1412.3555, 2014.
a
Cinkus, G., Mazzilli, N., Jourde, H., Wunsch, A., Liesch, T., Ravbar, N., Chen, Z., and Goldscheider, N.: When best is the enemy of good – critical evaluation of performance criteria in hydrological models, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 2397–2411,
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-2397-2023, 2023.
a
Deng, H., Chen, W., and Huang, G.: Deep insight into daily runoff forecasting based on a CNN-LSTM model, Natural Hazards, 113, 1675–1696,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-022-05363-2, 2022.
a
Ebtehaj, I. and Bonakdari, H.: CNN vs. LSTM: A Comparative Study of Hourly Precipitation Intensity Prediction as a Key Factor in Flood Forecasting Frameworks, Atmosphere, 15, 1082,
https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15091082, 2024.
a
Fukushima, K.: Neocognitron: A self-organizing neural network model for a mechanism of pattern recognition unaffected by shift in position, Biological Cybernetics, 36, 193–202,
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00344251, 1980.
a
Gauch, M., Kratzert, F., Klotz, D., Nearing, G., Lin, J., and Hochreiter, S.: Rainfall–runoff prediction at multiple timescales with a single Long Short-Term Memory network, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 2045–2062,
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-2045-2021, 2021.
a
Ghimire, S., Yaseen, Z. M., Farooque, A. A., Deo, R. C., Zhang, J., and Tao, X.: Streamflow prediction using an integrated methodology based on convolutional neural network and long short-term memory networks, Sci. Rep., 11, 17497,
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-96751-4, 2021.
a
Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., and Courville, A.: Deep learning, Adaptive computation and machine learning, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, ISBN 978-0-262-03561-3, 2016.
a,
b
Gupta, H. V., Kling, H., Yilmaz, K. K., and Martinez, G. F.: Decomposition of the mean squared error and NSE performance criteria: Implications for improving hydrological modelling, J. Hydrol., 377, 80–91,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.08.003, 2009.
a,
b
Haznedar, B., Kilinc, H. C., Ozkan, F., and Yurtsever, A.: Streamflow forecasting using a hybrid LSTM-PSO approach: the case of Seyhan Basin, Natural Hazards, 117, 681–701,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-023-05877-3, 2023.
a
Heitkamp, F., Ahrends, B., Evers, J., Steinicke, C., and Meesenburg, H.: Inference of forest soil nutrient regimes by integrating soil chemistry with fuzzy-logic: Regionwide application for stakeholders of Hesse, Germany, Geoderma Regional, 23, e00340,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geodrs.2020.e00340, 2020.
a
Herbert, Z. C., Asghar, Z., and Oroza, C. A.: Long-term reservoir inflow forecasts: enhanced water supply and inflow volume accuracy using deep learning, J. Hydrol., 601, 126676,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126676, 2021.
a
Hong, J., Lee, S., Bae, J. H., Lee, J., Park, W. J., Lee, D., Kim, J., and Lim, K. J.: Development and evaluation of the combined machine learning models for the prediction of dam inflow, Water, 12, 2927,
https://doi.org/10.3390/w12102927, 2020.
a
Hong, J., Lee, S., Lee, G., Yang, D., Bae Hyun, J., Kim, J., Kim, K., and Lim Jae, K.: Comparison of machine learning algorithms for discharge prediction of multipurpose dam, Water, 13, 3369,
https://doi.org/10.3390/w13233369, 2021.
a
Houska, T., Kraft, P., Chamorro-Chavez, A., and Breuer, L.: Spotting model parameters using a ready-made python package, PLOS ONE, 10, e0145180,
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145180, 2015.
a
Jehn, F. U., Breuer, L., Kraft, P., Bestian, K., and Houska, T.: Simple catchments and where to find them: the storage-discharge relationship as a proxy for catchment complexity, Front. Water, 3, 631651,
https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2021.631651, 2021.
a,
b,
c,
d
Kandel, I. and Castelli, M.: The effect of batch size on the generalizability of the convolutional neural networks on a histopathology dataset, ICT Express, 6, 312–315,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icte.2020.04.010, 2020.
a
Knoben, W. J. M., Freer, J. E., and Woods, R. A.: Technical note: Inherent benchmark or not? Comparing Nash–Sutcliffe and Kling–Gupta efficiency scores, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 4323–4331,
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4323-2019, 2019.
a,
b
Kratzert, F., Klotz, D., Herrnegger, M., Sampson, A. K., Hochreiter, S., and Nearing, G. S.: Toward Improved Predictions in Ungauged Basins: Exploiting the Power of Machine Learning, Water Resour. Res., 55, 11344–11354,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR026065, , 2019a.
a,
b,
c,
d,
e,
f,
g,
h,
i
Kratzert, F., Klotz, D., Shalev, G., Klambauer, G., Hochreiter, S., and Nearing, G.: Towards learning universal, regional, and local hydrological behaviors via machine learning applied to large-sample datasets, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 5089–5110,
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-5089-2019, 2019.b.
a,
b,
c,
d
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., and Hinton, G. E.: ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks, Communications of the ACM, 60, 84–90,
https://doi.org/10.1145/3065386, 2017.
a
Le, X.-H., Nguyen, D.-H., Jung, S., Yeon, M., and Lee, G.: Comparison of deep learning techniques for river streamflow forecasting, IEEE ACCESS, 9, 71805–71820,
https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3077703, 2021.
a
Le, X.-H., Nguyen, D. H., Jung, S., and Lee, G.: Deep neural network-based discharge prediction for upstream hydrological stations: a comparative study, Earth Sci. Inform., 16, 3113–3124,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-023-01082-9, 2023.
a,
b,
c
LeCun, Y., Boser, B., Denker, J., Henderson, D., Howard, R., Hubbard, W., and Jackel, L.: Handwritten digit recognition with a back-propagation network, in: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, edited by: Touretzky, D., vol. 2, Morgan-Kaufmann,
https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/1989/file/53c3bce66e43be4f209556518c2fcb54-Paper.pdf (last access: 16 June 2024), 1989. a
Lecun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y., and Haffner, P.: Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition, Proc. IEEE, 86, 2278–2324,
https://doi.org/10.1109/5.726791, 1998.
a
Li, J., Qian, K., Liu, Y., Yan, W., Yang, X., Luo, G., and Ma, X.: LSTM-Based Model for Predicting Inland River Runoff in Arid Region: A Case Study on Yarkant River, Northwest China, Water, 14, 1745,
https://doi.org/10.3390/w14111745, 2022.
a
Liano, K.: Robust error measure for supervised neural network learning with outliers, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 7, 246–250,
https://doi.org/10.1109/72.478411, 1996.
a
Lim, B., Sercan Ö. Arık, Loeff, N., and Pfister, T.: Temporal Fusion Transformers for interpretable multi-horizon time series forecasting, Int. J. Forecast., 37, 1748–1764,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2021.03.012, 2021.
a,
b
Lin, C., Wu, D., Liu, H., Xia, X., and Bhattarai, N.: Factor Identification and Prediction for Teen Driver Crash Severity Using Machine Learning: A Case Study, Appl. Sci., 10, 1675,
https://doi.org/10.3390/app10051675, 2020.
a
McKay, M. D., Beckman, R. J., and Conover, W. J.: Comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code, Technometrics, 21, 239–245,
https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1979.10489755, 1979.
a
Moriasi, D. N., Arnold, J. G., Liew, M. W. V., Bingner, R. L., Harmel, R. D., and Veith, T. L.: Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations, Transactions of the ASABE, 50, 885–900,
https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.23153, 2007.
a
Nabipour, N., Dehghani, M., Mosavi, A., and Shamshirband, S.: Short-term hydrological drought forecasting based on different nature-inspired optimization algorithms hybridized with artificial neural networks, IEEE Access, 8, 15210–15222,
https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2964584, 2020.
a,
b
Nguyen, Q., Shrestha, S., Ghimire, S., Sundaram, S. M., Xue, W., Virdis, S. G. P., and Maharjan, M.: Application of machine learning models in assessing the hydrological changes under climate change in the transboundary 3S River Basin, Journal of water and climate change, 14, 2902–2918,
https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2023.313, 2023a.
a,
b,
c,
d
Nguyen, T.-T.-H., Vu, D.-Q., Mai, S. T., and Dang, T. D.: Streamflow Prediction in the Mekong River Basin Using Deep Neural Networks, IEEE Access, 11, 97930–97943,
https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3301153, 2023b.
a
Oliveira, A. R., Ramos, T. B., and Neves, R.: Streamflow estimation in a mediterranean watershed using neural network models: a detailed description of the implementation and optimization, Water, 15, 947,
https://doi.org/10.3390/w15050947, 2023.
a,
b,
c
Ozaki, S., Ooka, R., and Ikeda, S.: Energy demand prediction with machine learning supported by auto-tuning: a case study, J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 2069, 012143,
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2069/1/012143, 2021.
a
Potdar, K., S., T., and D., C.: A Comparative Study of Categorical Variable Encoding Techniques for Neural Network Classifiers, International Journal of Computer Applications, 175, 7–9,
https://doi.org/10.5120/ijca2017915495, 2017.
a
Radiuk, P. M.: Impact of Training Set Batch Size on the Performance of Convolutional Neural Networks for Diverse Datasets, Information Technology and Management Science, 20,
https://doi.org/10.1515/itms-2017-0003, 2017.
a,
b
Ramachandran, P., Agarwal, S., Mondal, A., Shah, A., and Gupta, D.: S++: A Fast and Deployable Secure-Computation Framework for Privacy-Preserving Neural Network Training, arXiv [preprint],
https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2101.12078, 2021.
a
Santos, L., Thirel, G., and Perrin, C.: Technical note: Pitfalls in using log-transformed flows within the KGE criterion, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 4583–4591,
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-4583-2018, 2018.
a
Siqueira, V. A., Collischonn, W., Fan, F. M., and Chou, S. C.: Ensemble flood forecasting based on operational forecasts of the regional Eta EPS in the Taquari-Antas basin, RBRH, 21, 587–602,
https://doi.org/10.1590/2318-0331.011616004, 2016.
a
Sivapalan, M., Takeuchi, K., Franks, S. W., Gupta, V. K., Karambiri, H., Lakshmi, V., Liang, X., McDONNELL, J. J., Mendiondo, E. M., O'Connell, P. E., Oki, T., Pomeroy, J. W., Schertzer, D., Uhlenbrook, S., and Zehe, E.: IAHS Decade on Predictions in Ungauged Basins (PUB), 2003–2012: Shaping an exciting future for the hydrological sciences, Hydrol. Sci. J., 48, 857–880,
https://doi.org/10.1623/hysj.48.6.857.51421, 2003.
a
Srivastava, N., Hinton, G., Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., and Salakhutdinov, R.: Dropout: A Simple Way to Prevent Neural Networks from Overfitting, J. Mach. Learn. Res., 15, 1929–1958, 2014.
a,
b,
c
Ul Haq, I., Gondal, I., Vamplew, P., and Brown, S.: Categorical Features Transformation with Compact One-Hot Encoder for Fraud Detection in Distributed Environment, in: Data Mining, in: Communications in Computer and Information Science, edited by: Islam, R., Koh, Y. S., Zhao, Y., Warwick, G., Stirling, D., Li, C.-T., and Islam, Z., vol. 996, 69–80, Springer Singapore, Singapore, ISBN 9789811366604 9789811366611,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6661-1_6, 2019.
a
Vatanchi, S. M., Etemadfard, H., Maghrebi, M. F., and Shad, R.: A Comparative Study on Forecasting of Long-term Daily Streamflow using ANN, ANFIS, BiLSTM and CNN-GRU-LSTM, Water Resour. Manage., 37, 4769–4785,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-023-03579-w, 2023.
a
Wang, Q., Ma, Y., Zhao, K., and Tian, Y.: A Comprehensive Survey of Loss Functions in Machine Learning, Annals of Data Science, 9, 187–212,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40745-020-00253-5, 2022.
a
Weißenborn, M.: Neural networks in catchment hydrology: A comparative study of different algorithms in an ensemble of ungauged basins in Germany (1.0), Zenodo [code and data set],
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17289802, 2025.
a
Xu, Z., Dai, A. M., Kemp, J., and Metz, L.: Learning an Adaptive Learning Rate Schedule, arXiv [preprint],
https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.1909.09712, 2019.
a
Yang, S., Yu, X., and Zhou, Y.: LSTM and GRU Neural Network Performance Comparison Study: Taking Yelp Review Dataset as an Example, in: 2020 International Workshop on Electronic Communication and Artificial Intelligence (IWECAI), pp. 98–101, IEEE, Shanghai, China, ISBN 978-1-72818-149-3,
https://doi.org/10.1109/IWECAI50956.2020.00027, 2020.
a
