Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
HESS
Articles | Volume 29, issue 19
Articles | Volume 29, issue 19
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-5005-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-5005-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 29, issue 19
Research article
 | 
08 Oct 2025
Research article |  | 08 Oct 2025

How well do process-based and data-driven hydrological models learn from limited discharge data?

Maria Staudinger, Anna Herzog, Ralf Loritz, Tobias Houska, Sandra Pool, Diana Spieler, Paul D. Wagner, Juliane Mai, Jens Kiesel, Stephan Thober, Björn Guse, and Uwe Ehret

Viewed

Total article views: 1,769 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,525 216 28 1,769 59 31 48
  • HTML: 1,525
  • PDF: 216
  • XML: 28
  • Total: 1,769
  • Supplement: 59
  • BibTeX: 31
  • EndNote: 48
Views and downloads (calculated since 14 Mar 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 14 Mar 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,769 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,769 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 29 Oct 2025
Download
Short summary
Three process-based and four data-driven hydrological models are compared using different training data. We found that process-based models perform better with small datasets but stop learning soon, while data-driven models learn longer. The study highlights the importance of memory in data and the impact of different data sampling methods on model performance. The direct comparison of these models is novel and provides a clear understanding of their performance under various data conditions.
Read more
Share