Articles | Volume 29, issue 19
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-5005-2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-5005-2025
Research article
 | 
08 Oct 2025
Research article |  | 08 Oct 2025

How well do process-based and data-driven hydrological models learn from limited discharge data?

Maria Staudinger, Anna Herzog, Ralf Loritz, Tobias Houska, Sandra Pool, Diana Spieler, Paul D. Wagner, Juliane Mai, Jens Kiesel, Stephan Thober, Björn Guse, and Uwe Ehret

Viewed

Total article views: 7,537 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
5,806 1,511 220 7,537 398 192 237
  • HTML: 5,806
  • PDF: 1,511
  • XML: 220
  • Total: 7,537
  • Supplement: 398
  • BibTeX: 192
  • EndNote: 237
Views and downloads (calculated since 14 Mar 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 14 Mar 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 7,537 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 7,374 with geography defined and 163 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Saved (final revised paper)

Latest update: 20 Sep 2026
Download
Short summary
Three process-based and four data-driven hydrological models are compared using different training data. We found that process-based models perform better with small datasets but stop learning soon, while data-driven models learn longer. The study highlights the importance of memory in data and the impact of different data sampling methods on model performance. The direct comparison of these models is novel and provides a clear understanding of their performance under various data conditions.
Share