Articles | Volume 29, issue 18
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-4711-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-4711-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
29 Sep 2025
Research article |
| 29 Sep 2025
| 29 Sep 2025
Assessing multivariate bias corrections of climate simulations on various impact models under climate change
INRAE, BioSP, Avignon 84914, France
Mathieu Vrac
Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement (LSCE-IPSL), CEA/CNRS/UVSQ, Université Paris-Saclay, Centre d'Etudes de Saclay, Orme des Merisiers, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
Bastien François
Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI), Research and Development Weather and Climate (RDWK), De Bilt, the Netherlands
Iñaki García de Cortázar-Atauri
INRAE, Agroclim, Avignon 84914, France
Related authors
Lionel Benoit, Matthew P. Lucas, Denis Allard, Keri M. Kodama, and Thomas W. Giambelluca
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2181, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2181, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
In mountainous regions the interactions between topography and prevailing winds generate orographic effects, which modulate rainfall occurrence and intensity depending on slope exposure, finally creating strong rainfall gradients. This study introduces a geostatistical model dedicated to rainfall mapping in mountainous areas, which therefore explicitly account for possible orographic effects.
Mathieu Vrac, Denis Allard, Grégoire Mariéthoz, Soulivanh Thao, and Lucas Schmutz
Earth Syst. Dynam., 15, 735–762, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-735-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-735-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We aim to combine multiple global climate models (GCMs) to enhance the robustness of future projections. We introduce a novel approach, called "α pooling", aggregating the cumulative distribution functions (CDFs) of the models into a CDF more aligned with historical data. The new CDFs allow us to perform bias adjustment of all the raw climate simulations at once. Experiments with European temperature and precipitation demonstrate the superiority of this approach over conventional techniques.
Guillaume Evin, Benoit Hingray, Guillaume Thirel, Agnès Ducharne, Laurent Strohmenger, Lola Corre, Yves Tramblay, Jean-Philippe Vidal, Jérémie Bonneau, François Colleoni, Joël Gailhard, Florence Habets, Frédéric Hendrickx, Louis Héraut, Peng Huang, Matthieu Le Lay, Claire Magand, Paola Marson, Céline Monteil, Simon Munier, Alix Reverdy, Jean-Michel Soubeyroux, Yoann Robin, Jean-Pierre Vergnes, Mathieu Vrac, and Eric Sauquet
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2727, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2727, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS).
Short summary
Short summary
Explore2 provides hydrological projections for 1,735 French catchments. Using QUALYPSO, this study assesses uncertainties, including internal variability. By the end of the century, low flows are projected to decline in southern France under high emissions, while other indicators remain uncertain. Emission scenarios and regional climate models are key uncertainty sources. Internal variability is often as large as climate-driven changes.
Robin Noyelle, Davide Faranda, Yoann Robin, Mathieu Vrac, and Pascal Yiou
Weather Clim. Dynam., 6, 817–839, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-6-817-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-6-817-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Properties of extreme meteorological and climatological events are changing under human-caused climate change. Extreme event attribution methods seek to estimate the contribution of global warming in the probability and intensity changes of extreme events. Here we propose a procedure to estimate these quantities for the flow analogue method, which compares the observed event to similar events in the past.
Duncan Pappert, Alexandre Tuel, Dim Coumou, Mathieu Vrac, and Olivia Martius
Weather Clim. Dynam., 6, 769–788, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-6-769-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-6-769-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study compares the dynamical structures that characterise long-lasting (persistent) and short hot spells in Western Europe. We find differences in large-scale atmospheric flow patterns during the events and particular soil moisture evolutions, which can account for the variation in event duration. There is variability in how drivers combine in individual events. Understanding persistent heat extremes can help improve their representation in models and ultimately their prediction.
Germain Bénard, Marion Gehlen, and Mathieu Vrac
Earth Syst. Dynam., 16, 1085–1102, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-1085-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-1085-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We introduce a novel approach to compare Earth system model output using a causality-based approach. The analysis of interactions between atmospheric, oceanic and biogeochemical variables in the North Atlantic subpolar gyre highlights the dynamics of each model. This method reveals potential underlying causes of model differences, offering a tool for enhanced model evaluation and improved understanding of complex Earth system dynamics under past and future climates.
Bastien François, Khalil Teber, Lou Brett, Richard Leeding, Luis Gimeno-Sotelo, Daniela I. V. Domeisen, Laura Suarez-Gutierrez, and Emanuele Bevacqua
Earth Syst. Dynam., 16, 1029–1051, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-1029-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-1029-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Spatially compounding wind and precipitation (CWP) extremes can lead to severe impacts on society. We find that concurrent climate variability modes favor the occurrence of such wintertime spatially compounding events in the Northern Hemisphere and can even amplify the number of regions and population exposed. Our analysis highlights the importance of considering the interplay between variability modes to improve risk management of such spatially compounding events.
Lionel Benoit, Matthew P. Lucas, Denis Allard, Keri M. Kodama, and Thomas W. Giambelluca
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2181, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2181, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
In mountainous regions the interactions between topography and prevailing winds generate orographic effects, which modulate rainfall occurrence and intensity depending on slope exposure, finally creating strong rainfall gradients. This study introduces a geostatistical model dedicated to rainfall mapping in mountainous areas, which therefore explicitly account for possible orographic effects.
Ségolène Crossouard, Soulivanh Thao, Thomas Dubos, Masa Kageyama, Mathieu Vrac, and Yann Meurdesoif
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1418, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1418, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Current atmospheric models are limited by the computational time required for physical processes, known as physical parameterizations. To address this, we developed neural network-based emulators to replace these parameterizations in the IPSL climate model, using a simplified aquaplanet setup. We found that incorporating some physical knowledge, such as latent variables, into the learning process can improve predictions.
Yoann Robin, Mathieu Vrac, Aurélien Ribes, Occitane Barbaux, and Philippe Naveau
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1121, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1121, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We describe an improved method and the associated free licensed package ANKIALE (ANalysis of Klimate with bayesian Inference: AppLication to extreme Events) for estimating the statistics of temperature extremes. This method uses climate model simulations (including multiple scenarios simultaneously) to provide a prior of the real-world changes, constrained by the observations. The method and the tool are illustrated via an application to temperature over Europe until 2100, for four scenarios.
Pradeebane Vaittinada Ayar, Stella Bourdin, Davide Faranda, and Mathieu Vrac
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-252, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-252, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The tracking of Tropical cyclones (TCs) remains a matter of interest for the investigation of observed and simulated tropical cyclones. In this study, Random Forest (RF), a machine learning approach, is considered to track TCs. RF associates TC occurrence or absence to different atmospheric configurations. Compared to trackers found in the literature, it shows similar performance for tracking TCs, better control over false alarm, more flexibility and reveal key variables allowing to detect TCs.
Paul C. Astagneau, Raul R. Wood, Mathieu Vrac, Sven Kotlarski, Pradeebane Vaittinada Ayar, Bastien François, and Manuela I. Brunner
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3966, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-3966, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
To study floods and droughts are likely to change in the future, we use climate projections from climate models. However, we first need to adjust the systematic biases of these projections at the catchment scale before using them in hydrological models. Our study compares statistical methods that can adjust these biases, but specifically for climate projections that enable a quantification of internal climate variability. We provide recommendations on the most appropriate methods.
Joséphine Schmutz, Mathieu Vrac, Bastien François, and Burak Bulut
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-461, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-461, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
In recent years, Europe has faced severe hot and dry events affecting biodiversity, agriculture, and health. Understanding past significant variation in their occurrence is key for adaptation. This paper identifies emerging hotspots in Europe and North Africa. Since the 1970s, the Iberian Peninsula, Maghreb, and Central Europe have seen more frequent events, driven by rising temperature maxima, while Eastern Europe has experienced a decline due to changes in drought.
Davide Faranda, Gabriele Messori, Erika Coppola, Tommaso Alberti, Mathieu Vrac, Flavio Pons, Pascal Yiou, Marion Saint Lu, Andreia N. S. Hisi, Patrick Brockmann, Stavros Dafis, Gianmarco Mengaldo, and Robert Vautard
Weather Clim. Dynam., 5, 959–983, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-5-959-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-5-959-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We introduce ClimaMeter, a tool offering real-time insights into extreme-weather events. Our tool unveils how climate change and natural variability affect these events, affecting communities worldwide. Our research equips policymakers and the public with essential knowledge, fostering informed decisions and enhancing climate resilience. We analysed two distinct events, showcasing ClimaMeter's global relevance.
Mathieu Vrac, Denis Allard, Grégoire Mariéthoz, Soulivanh Thao, and Lucas Schmutz
Earth Syst. Dynam., 15, 735–762, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-735-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-735-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We aim to combine multiple global climate models (GCMs) to enhance the robustness of future projections. We introduce a novel approach, called "α pooling", aggregating the cumulative distribution functions (CDFs) of the models into a CDF more aligned with historical data. The new CDFs allow us to perform bias adjustment of all the raw climate simulations at once. Experiments with European temperature and precipitation demonstrate the superiority of this approach over conventional techniques.
Moctar Dembélé, Mathieu Vrac, Natalie Ceperley, Sander J. Zwart, Josh Larsen, Simon J. Dadson, Grégoire Mariéthoz, and Bettina Schaefli
Proc. IAHS, 385, 121–127, https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-385-121-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-385-121-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This study assesses the impact of climate change on the timing, seasonality and magnitude of mean annual minimum (MAM) flows and annual maximum flows (AMF) in the Volta River basin (VRB). Several climate change projection data are use to simulate river flow under multiple greenhouse gas emission scenarios. Future projections show that AMF could increase with various magnitude but negligible shift in time across the VRB, while MAM could decrease with up to 14 days of delay in occurrence.
Lina Teckentrup, Martin G. De Kauwe, Gab Abramowitz, Andrew J. Pitman, Anna M. Ukkola, Sanaa Hobeichi, Bastien François, and Benjamin Smith
Earth Syst. Dynam., 14, 549–576, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-549-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-549-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Studies analyzing the impact of the future climate on ecosystems employ climate projections simulated by global circulation models. These climate projections display biases that translate into significant uncertainty in projections of the future carbon cycle. Here, we test different methods to constrain the uncertainty in simulations of the carbon cycle over Australia. We find that all methods reduce the bias in the steady-state carbon variables but that temporal properties do not improve.
Cedric Gacial Ngoungue Langue, Christophe Lavaysse, Mathieu Vrac, and Cyrille Flamant
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 1313–1333, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-1313-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-1313-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Heat waves (HWs) are climatic hazards that affect the planet. We assess here uncertainties encountered in the process of HW detection and analyse their recent trends in West Africa using reanalysis data. Three types of uncertainty have been investigated. We identified 6 years with higher frequency of HWs, possibly due to higher sea surface temperatures in the equatorial Atlantic. We noticed an increase in HW characteristics during the last decade, which could be a consequence of climate change.
Robert Vautard, Geert Jan van Oldenborgh, Rémy Bonnet, Sihan Li, Yoann Robin, Sarah Kew, Sjoukje Philip, Jean-Michel Soubeyroux, Brigitte Dubuisson, Nicolas Viovy, Markus Reichstein, Friederike Otto, and Iñaki Garcia de Cortazar-Atauri
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 1045–1058, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-1045-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-1045-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
A deep frost occurred in early April 2021, inducing severe damages in grapevine and fruit trees in France. We found that such extreme frosts occurring after the start of the growing season such as those of April 2021 are currently about 2°C colder [0.5 °C to 3.3 °C] in observations than in preindustrial climate. This observed intensification of growing-period frosts is attributable, at least in part, to human-caused climate change, making the 2021 event 50 % more likely [10 %–110 %].
Bastien François and Mathieu Vrac
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 21–44, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-21-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-21-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Compound events (CEs) result from a combination of several climate phenomena. In this study, we propose a new methodology to assess the time of emergence of CE probabilities and to quantify the contribution of marginal and dependence properties of climate phenomena to the overall CE probability changes. By applying our methodology to two case studies, we show the importance of considering changes in both marginal and dependence properties for future risk assessments related to CEs.
Antoine Grisart, Mathieu Casado, Vasileios Gkinis, Bo Vinther, Philippe Naveau, Mathieu Vrac, Thomas Laepple, Bénédicte Minster, Frederic Prié, Barbara Stenni, Elise Fourré, Hans Christian Steen-Larsen, Jean Jouzel, Martin Werner, Katy Pol, Valérie Masson-Delmotte, Maria Hoerhold, Trevor Popp, and Amaelle Landais
Clim. Past, 18, 2289–2301, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-18-2289-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-18-2289-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents a compilation of high-resolution (11 cm) water isotopic records, including published and new measurements, for the last 800 000 years from the EPICA Dome C ice core, Antarctica. Using this new combined water isotopes (δ18O and δD) dataset, we study the variability and possible influence of diffusion at the multi-decadal to multi-centennial scale. We observe a stronger variability at the onset of the interglacial interval corresponding to a warm period.
Moctar Dembélé, Mathieu Vrac, Natalie Ceperley, Sander J. Zwart, Josh Larsen, Simon J. Dadson, Grégoire Mariéthoz, and Bettina Schaefli
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 1481–1506, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1481-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1481-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Climate change impacts on water resources in the Volta River basin are investigated under various global warming scenarios. Results reveal contrasting changes in future hydrological processes and water availability, depending on greenhouse gas emission scenarios, with implications for floods and drought occurrence over the 21st century. These findings provide insights for the elaboration of regional adaptation and mitigation strategies for climate change.
Yoann Robin and Mathieu Vrac
Earth Syst. Dynam., 12, 1253–1273, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-1253-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-1253-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We propose a new multivariate downscaling and bias correction approach called
time-shifted multivariate bias correction, which aims to correct temporal dependencies in addition to inter-variable and spatial ones. Our method is evaluated in a
perfect model experimentcontext where simulations are used as pseudo-observations. The results show a large reduction of the biases in the temporal properties, while inter-variable and spatial dependence structures are still correctly adjusted.
Cedric G. Ngoungue Langue, Christophe Lavaysse, Mathieu Vrac, Philippe Peyrillé, and Cyrille Flamant
Weather Clim. Dynam., 2, 893–912, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2-893-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2-893-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This work assesses the forecast of the temperature over the Sahara, a key driver of the West African Monsoon, at a seasonal timescale. The seasonal models are able to reproduce the climatological state and some characteristics of the temperature during the rainy season in the Sahel. But, because of errors in the timing, the forecast skill scores are significant only for the first 4 weeks.
Anna Denvil-Sommer, Marion Gehlen, and Mathieu Vrac
Ocean Sci., 17, 1011–1030, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-17-1011-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-17-1011-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
In this work we explored design options for a future Atlantic-scale observational network enabling the release of carbon system estimates by combining data streams from various platforms. We used outputs of a physical–biogeochemical global ocean model at sites of real-world observations to reconstruct surface ocean pCO2 by applying a non-linear feed-forward neural network. The results provide important information for future BGC-Argo deployment, i.e. important regions and the number of floats.
Mathieu Vrac and Soulivanh Thao
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 5367–5387, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5367-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5367-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We propose a multivariate bias correction (MBC) method to adjust the spatial and/or inter-variable properties of climate simulations, while also accounting for their temporal dependences (e.g., autocorrelations).
It consists on a method reordering the ranks of the time series according to their multivariate distance to a reference time series.
Results show that temporal correlations are improved while spatial and inter-variable correlations are still satisfactorily corrected.
Cited articles
Adeyeri, O. E., Zhou, W., Laux, P., Ndehedehe, C. E., Wang, X., Usman, M., and Akinsanola, A. A.: Multivariate Drought Monitoring, Propagation, and Projection Using Bias-Corrected General Circulation Models, Earth's Future, 11, e2022EF003303, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022EF003303, 2023. a
Allard, D., Bastien, F., García de Cortázar-Atauri, I., and Vrac, M.: Dataset for “Agroclimatic indicators with multivariate bias correction methods”, Recherche Data Gouv [data set], https://doi.org/10.57745/TUIHKT, 2024. a
Ansari, R., Casanueva, A., Liaqat, M. U., and Grossi, G.: Evaluation of bias correction methods for a multivariate drought index: case study of the Upper Jhelum Basin, Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 2055–2076, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2055-2023, 2023. a
Bachelet, D., Neilson, R. P., Lenihan, J. M., and Drapek, R. J.: Climate Change Effects on Vegetation Distribution and Carbon Budget in the United States, Ecosystems, 4, 164–185, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-001-0002-7, 2001. a
Bárdossy, A. and Pegram, G.: Multiscale spatial recorrelation of RCM precipitation to produce unbiased climate change scenarios over large areas and small, Water Resour. Res., 48, 9502, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR011524, 2012. a
Barik, A. and Baidya Roy, S.: Climate change strongly affects future fire weather danger in Indian forests, Commun. Earth Environ., 4, 452, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-023-01112-w, 2023. a
Bates, B., Kundzewicz, Z., Wu, S., Burkett, V., Doell, P., Gwary, D., Hanson, C., Heij, B., Jiménez, B., Kaser, G., Kitoh, A., Kovats, S., Kumar, P., Magadza, C., Martino, D., Mata, L., Medany, M., Miller, K., and Arnell, N.: Climate Change and Water. Technical Paper of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Tech. rep., The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2008. a
Bellard, C., Bertelsmeier, C., Leadley, P., Thuiller, W., and Courchamp, F.: Impacts of climate change on the future of biodiversity, Ecol. Lett., 15, 365–377, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01736.x, 2012. a
Berg, P., Feldmann, H., and Panitz, H.-J.: Bias correction of high resolution regional climate model data, J. Hydrol., 448–449, 80–92, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.04.026, 2012. a
Bezner Kerr, R., Hasegawa, T., Lasco, R., Bhatt, I., Deryng, D., Farrell, A., Gurney-Smith, H., Ju, H., Lluch-Cota, S., Meza, F., Nelson, G., Neufeldt, H., and Thornton, P.: Food, Fibre, and Other Ecosystem Products, 713–906, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, USA, ISBN 9781009325844, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009325844.007, 2022. a
Boucher, O., Servonnat, J., Albright, A. L., Aumont, O., Balkanski, Y., Bastrikov, V., Bekki, S., Bonnet, R., Bony, S., Bopp, L., Braconnot, P., Brockmann, P., Cadule, P., Caubel, A., Chéruy, F., Codron, F., Cozic, A., Cugnet, D., D’Andrea, F., Davini, P., de Lavergne, C., Denvil, S., Deshayes, J., Devilliers, M., Ducharne, A., Dufresne, J.-L., Dupont, E., Éthé, C., Fairhead, L., Falletti, L., Flavoni, S., Foujols, M.-A., Gardoll, S., Gastineau, G., Ghattas, J., Grandpeix, J.-Y., Guenet, B., Guez, L. E., Guilyardi, E., Guimberteau, M., Hauglustaine, D., Hourdin, F., Idelkadi, A., Joussaume, S., Kageyama, M., Khodri, M., Krinner, G., Lebas, N., Levavasseur, G., Lévy, C., Li, L., Lott, F., Lurton, T., Luyssaert, S., Madec, G., Madeleine, J.-B., Maignan, F., Marchand, M., Marti, O., Mellul, L., Meurdesoif, Y., Mignot, J., Musat, I., Ottlé, C., Peylin, P., Planton, Y., Polcher, J., Rio, C., Rochetin, N., Rousset, C., Sepulchre, P., Sima, A., Swingedouw, D., Thiéblemont, R., Traoré, A.-K., Vancoppenolle, M., Vial, J., Vialard, J., Viovy, N., and Vuichard, N.: Presentation and evaluation of the IPSL-CM6A-LR climate model, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 12, e2019MS002010, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS002010, 2020. a
Boé, J., Terray, L., Habets, F., and Martin, E.: Statistical and dynamical downscaling of the Seine basin climate for hydro-meteorological studies, Int. J. Climatol., 27, 1643–1655, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1602, 2007. a
Caminade, C., Kovats, S., Rocklov, J., Tompkins, A. M., Morse, A. P., Colón-González, F. J., Stenlund, H., Martens, P., and Lloyd, S. J.: Impact of climate change on global malaria distribution, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 111, 3286–3291, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1302089111, 2014. a
Cannon, A., Sobie, S., and Murdock, T.: Bias Correction of GCM Precipitation by Quantile Mapping: How Well Do Methods Preserve Changes in Quantiles and Extremes?, J. Climate, 28, 6938–6959, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00754.1, 2015. a
Cannon, A. J.: Multivariate quantile mapping bias correction: an N-dimensional probability density function transform for climate model simulations of multiple variables, Clim. Dynam., 50, 31–49, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-017-3580-6, 2018. a, b
Casanueva, A., Bedia, J., Herrera García, S., Fernández, J., and Gutiérrez, J.: Direct and component-wise bias correction of multi-variate climate indices: the percentile adjustment function diagnostic tool, Clim. Change, 147, 411–425, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2167-5, 2018. a, b
Cattiaux, J., Douville, H., and Peings, Y.: European temperatures in CMIP5: Origins of present-day biases and future uncertainties, Clim. Dynam., 41, 2889–2907, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-013-1731-y, 2013. a
Caubel, J., García de Cortázar-Atauri, I. G., Launay, M., de Noblet-Ducoudré, N., Huard, F., Bertuzzi, P., and Graux, A.-I.: Broadening the scope for ecoclimatic indicators to assess crop climate suitability according to ecophysiological, technical and quality criteria, Agric. Forest Meteorol., 207, 94–106, 2015. a, b
Chemison, A., Ramstein, G., Tompkins, A. M., Defrance, D., Camus, G., Charra, M., and Caminade, C.: Impact of an accelerated melting of Greenland on malaria distribution over Africa, Nat. Commun., 12, 3971, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-24134-4, 2021. a
Chen, J., Brissette, F. P., Chaumont, D., and Braun, M.: Finding appropriate bias correction methods in downscaling precipitation for hydrologic impact studies over North America, Water Resour. Res., 49, 4187–4205, https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20331, 2013. a
Chen, J., Li, C., Brissette, F. P., Chen, H., Wang, M., and Essou, G. R.: Impacts of correcting the inter-variable correlation of climate model outputs on hydrological modeling, J. Hydrol., 560, 326–341, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.03.040, 2018. a
Chiles, J.-P. and Delfiner, P.: Geostatistics: modeling spatial uncertainty, vol. 713, John Wiley & Sons, https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118136188, 2012. a
Christensen, J. H., Boberg, F., Christensen, O. B., and Lucas-Picher, P.: On the need for bias correction of regional climate change projections of temperature and precipitation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L20709, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL035694, 2008. a
Chuine, I.: Why does phenology drive species distribution?, Philos. T. Roy. Soc. B, 365, 3149–3160, 2010. a
Chuine, I., García de Cortázar-Atauri, I., Kramer, K., and Hänninen, H.: Plant development models, Phenology: an integrative environmental science, edited by: Schwartz, M. D., Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 275–293, 2013. a
Clark, M., Gangopadhyay, S., Hay, L., Rajagopalan, B., and Wilby, R.: The Schaake shuffle: A method for reconstructing space–time variability in forecasted precipitation and temperature fields, J. Hydrometeorol., 5, 243–262, 2004. a
Dekens, L., Parey, S., Grandjacques, M., and Dacunha-Castelle, D.: Multivariate distribution correction of climate model outputs: A generalization of quantile mapping approaches: Multivariate distribution correction of climate model outputs, Environmetrics, 28, e2454, https://doi.org/10.1002/env.2454, 2017. a
Dupuy, J.-l., Fargeon, H., Martin-StPaul, N., Pimont, F., Ruffault, J., Guijarro, M., Hernando, C., Madrigal, J., and Fernandes, P.: Climate change impact on future wildfire danger and activity in southern Europe: a review, Annals of Forest Science, 77, 1–24, 2020. a
Déqué, M.: Frequency of precipitation and temperature extremes over France in an anthropogenic scenario: Model results and statistical correction according to observed values, Global Planet. Change, 57, 16–26, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2006.11.030, 2007. a
Eden, J., Widmann, M., Grawe, D., and Rast, S.: Skill, Correction, and Downscaling of GCM-Simulated Precipitation, J. Climate, 25, 3970–3984, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00254.1, 2012. a, b
Eyring, V., Bony, S., Meehl, G. A., Senior, C. A., Stevens, B., Stouffer, R. J., and Taylor, K. E.: Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 1937–1958, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1937-2016, 2016. a, b
François, B., Thao, S., and Vrac, M.: Adjusting spatial dependence of climate model outputs with cycle-consistent adversarial networks, Clim. Dynam., 57, 3323–3353, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-021-05869-8, 2021. a
Galizia, L. F., Barbero, R., Rodrigues, M., Ruffault, J., Pimont, F., and Curt, T.: Global warming reshapes European pyroregions, Earth's Future, 11, e2022EF003182, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022EF003182, 2023. a
Galmarini, S., Solazzo, E., Ferrise, R., Srivastava, A. K., Ahmed, M., Asseng, S., Cannon, A., Dentener, F., De Sanctis, G., Gaiser, T., Gao, Y., Gayler, S., Gutierrez, J., Hoogenboom, G., Iturbide, M., Jury, M., Lange, S., Loukos, H., Maraun, D., Moriondo, M., McGinnis, S., Nendel, C., Padovan, G., Riccio, A., Ripoche, D., Stockle, C., Supit, I., Thao, S., Trombi, G., Vrac, M., Weber, T., and Zhao, C.: Assessing the impact on crop modelling of multi- and uni-variate climate model bias adjustments, Agricultural Systems, 215, 103846, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2023.103846, 2024. a, b, c, d, e, f
García de Cortázar-Atauri, I. and Maury, O.: GETARI: Generic Evaluation Tool of AgRoclimatic Indicators, Recherche Data Gouv [data set], https://doi.org/10.15454/IZUFAP, 2019. a
Gudmundsson, L., Bremnes, J. B., Haugen, J. E., and Engen-Skaugen, T.: Technical Note: Downscaling RCM precipitation to the station scale using statistical transformations – a comparison of methods, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 3383–3390, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-3383-2012, 2012. a
Guo, Q., Chen, J., Zhang, X., Shen, M., Chen, H., and Guo, S.: A new two-stage multivariate quantile mapping method for bias correcting climate model outputs, Clim. Dynam., 53, 3603–3623, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-019-04729-w, 2019. a
Guo, Q., Chen, J., Zhang, X. J., Xu, C.-Y., and Chen, H.: Impacts of Using State-of-the-Art Multivariate Bias Correction Methods on Hydrological Modeling Over North America, Water Resour. Res., 56, e2019WR026659, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR026659, 2020. a, b
Haddad, Z. and Rosenfeld, D.: Optimality of empirical Z-R relations, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 123, 1283–1293, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712354107, 1997. a
Hagemann, S., Chen, C., Clark, D. B., Folwell, S., Gosling, S. N., Haddeland, I., Hanasaki, N., Heinke, J., Ludwig, F., Voss, F., and Wiltshire, A. J.: Climate change impact on available water resources obtained using multiple global climate and hydrology models, Earth Syst. Dynam., 4, 129–144, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-4-129-2013, 2013. a
Hakala, K., Addor, N., and Seibert, J.: Hydrological Modeling to Evaluate Climate Model Simulations and Their Bias Correction, J. Hydrometeorol., 19, 1321–1337, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-17-0189.1, 2018. a
Ivanov, M. A. and Kotlarski, S.: Assessing distribution-based climate model bias correction methods over an alpine domain: added value and limitations, Int. J. Climatol., 37, 2633–2653, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4870, 2017. a
Laux, P., Rötter, R. P., Webber, H., Dieng, D., Rahimi, J., Wei, J., Faye, B., Srivastava, A. K., Bliefernicht, J., Adeyeri, O., Arnault, J., and Kunstmann, H.: To bias correct or not to bias correct? An agricultural impact modelers’ perspective on regional climate model data, Agric. For. Meteorol., 304–305, 108406, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2021.108406, 2021. a
Lemaitre-Basset, T., Oudin, L., Thirel, G., and Collet, L.: Unraveling the contribution of potential evaporation formulation to uncertainty under climate change, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 2147–2159, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2147-2022, 2022. a
Maraun, D., Wetterhall, F., Ireson, A. M., Chandler, R. E., Kendon, E. J., Widmann, M., Brienen, S., Rust, H. W., Sauter, T., Themeßl, M., Venema, V. K. C., Chun, K. P., Goodess, C. M., Jones, R. G., Onof, C., Vrac, M., and Thiele-Eich, I.: Precipitation downscaling under climate change: Recent developments to bridge the gap between dynamical models and the end user, Rev. Geophys., 48, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009RG000314, 2010. a
Maury, O., García de Cortázar-Atauri, I., Bertuzzi, P., Persyn, B., and Lagier, M.: SICLIMA: Système d’information de données climatiques maillées, Recherche Data Gouv, V1 [data set], https://doi.org/10.15454/HIPDPZ, 2021. a
Mehrotra, R. and Sharma, A.: A Resampling Approach for Correcting Systematic Spatiotemporal Biases for Multiple Variables in a Changing Climate, Water Resour. Res., 55, 754–770, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR023270, 2019. a, b
Menzel, A. and Sparks, T.: Temperature and Plant Development: Phenology and Seasonality, In Plant Growth and Climate Change, edited by: Morison, J. I. L., and Morecroft, M. D., https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470988695.ch4, 2006.
Meyer, J., Kohn, I., Stahl, K., Hakala, K., Seibert, J., and Cannon, A. J.: Effects of univariate and multivariate bias correction on hydrological impact projections in alpine catchments, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 1339–1354, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-1339-2019, 2019. a
Michelangeli, P.-A., Vrac, M., and Loukos, H.: Probabilistic downscaling approaches: Application to wind cumulative distribution functions, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L11708, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL038401, 2009. a, b, c
Moran, P. A. P.: Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena, Biometrika, 37, 17–23, https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/37.1-2.17, 1950. a
MTES: Forests: Extract from France's 2024 Environmental Performance Review, https://www.statistiques.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/les-forets-en-france-synthese-des-connaissances-en-2024 (last access: 25 September 2025), 2024. a
Mueller, B. and Seneviratne, S.: Systematic land climate and evapotranspiration biases in CMIP5 simulations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 128–134, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013GL058055, 2014. a
Nahar, J., Johnson, F., and Sharma, A.: Addressing Spatial Dependence Bias in Climate Model Simulations–An Independent Component Analysis Approach, Water Resour. Res., 54, 827–841, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR021293, 2018. a
Nguyen, H., Mehrotra, R., and Sharma, A.: Correcting systematic biases across multiple atmospheric variables in the frequency domain, Clim. Dynam., 52, 1283–1298, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-018-4191-6, 2019. a
Oettli, P., Sultan, B., Baron, C., and Vrac, M.: Are regional climate models relevant for crop yield prediction in West Africa?, Environ. Res. Lett., 6, 014008, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/6/1/014008, 2011. a
Pan, B., Anderson, G., Gonçalves, A., Lucas, D., Bonfils, C., Lee, J., Tian, Y., and Ma, H.-Y.: Learning to Correct Climate Projection Biases, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 13, e2021MS002509, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021MS002509, 2021. a
Piani, C. and Haerter, J.: Two dimensional bias correction of temperature and precipitation copulas in climate models, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L20401, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL053839, 2012. a
Pimont, F., Fargeon, H., Opitz, T., Ruffault, J., Barbero, R., Martin-StPaul, N., Rigolot, E., Riviére, M., and Dupuy, J.-L.: Prediction of regional wildfire activity in the probabilistic Bayesian framework of Firelihood, Ecol. Appl., 31, e02316, https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.2316, 2021. a
Pimont, F., Dupuy, J.-L., Ruffault, J., Rigolot, E., Opitz, T., Legrand, J., and Barbero, R.: Projections des effets du changement climatique sur l’activité des feux de forêt au 21ème siècle: Rapport final, Tech. rep., INRAE, 2023. a
Robin, Y. and Vrac, M.: Is time a variable like the others in multivariate statistical downscaling and bias correction?, Earth Syst. Dynam., 12, 1253–1273, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-1253-2021, 2021. a
Ruffault, J., Curt, T., Moron, V., Trigo, R. M., Mouillot, F., Koutsias, N., Pimont, F., Martin-StPaul, N., Barbero, R., Dupuy, J.-L., Russo, A., and Belhadj-Khedher, C.: Increased likelihood of heat-induced large wildfires in the Mediterranean Basin, Sci. Rep., 10, 13790, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70069-z, 2020. a
Räty, O., Räisänen, J., Bosshard, T., and Donnelly, C.: Intercomparison of Univariate and Joint Bias Correction Methods in Changing Climate From a Hydrological Perspective, Climate, 6, 33, https://doi.org/10.3390/cli6020033, 2018. a
Rötter, R. P., Höhn, J. G., and Fronzek, S.: Projections of climate change impacts on crop production: A global and a Nordic perspective, Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, A, 62, 166–180, https://doi.org/10.1080/09064702.2013.793735, 2012. a
Schmidli, J., Frei, C., and Vidale, P. L.: Downscaling from GCM precipitation: a benchmark for dynamical and statistical downscaling methods, Int. J. Climatol., 26, 679–689, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1287, 2006. a
Senande-Rivera, M., Insua-Costa, D., and Miguez-Macho, G.: Spatial and temporal expansion of global wildland fire activity in response to climate change, Nat. Commun., 13, 1208, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-28835-2, 2022. a
Singh, H. and Reza Najafi, M.: Evaluation of gridded climate datasets over Canada using univariate and bivariate approaches: Implications for hydrological modelling, J. Hydrol., 584, 124673, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124673, 2020. a
Su, T., Chen, J., Cannon, A. J., Xie, P., and Guo, Q.: Multi-site bias correction of climate model outputs for hydro-meteorological impact studies: An application over a watershed in China, Hydrol. Process., 34, 2575–2598, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13750, 2020. a
Tao, F., Rötter, R. P., Palosuo, T., Gregorio Hernández Díaz-Ambrona, C., Mínguez, M. I., Semenov, M. A., Kersebaum, K. C., Nendel, C., Specka, X., Hoffmann, H., Ewert, F., Dambreville, A., Martre, P., Rodríguez, L., Ruiz-Ramos, M., Gaiser, T., Höhn, J. G., Salo, T., Ferrise, R., Bindi, M., Cammarano, D., and Schulman, A. H.: Contribution of crop model structure, parameters and climate projections to uncertainty in climate change impact assessments, Glob. Change Biol. Bioenergy, 24, 1291–1307, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14019, 2018. a
Teckentrup, L., De Kauwe, M. G., Abramowitz, G., Pitman, A. J., Ukkola, A. M., Hobeichi, S., François, B., and Smith, B.: Opening Pandora's box: reducing global circulation model uncertainty in Australian simulations of the carbon cycle, Earth Syst. Dynam., 14, 549–576, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-549-2023, 2023. a
Teutschbein, C. and Seibert, J.: Bias correction of regional climate model simulations for hydrological climate-change impact studies: Review and evaluation of different methods, J. Hydrol., 456, 12–29, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.05.052, 2012. a, b
Tootoonchi, F., Haerter, J. O., Todorović, A., Räty, O., Grabs, T., and Teutschbein, C.: Uni- and multivariate bias adjustment methods in Nordic catchments: Complexity and performance in a changing climate, Sci. Total Environ., 853, 158615, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158615, 2022. a
Vallejos, R. and Osorio, F.: Effective sample size of spatial process models, Spatial statistics, 9, 66–92, 2014. a
Van de Velde, J., Demuzere, M., De Baets, B., and Verhoest, N. E. C.: Impact of bias nonstationarity on the performance of uni- and multivariate bias-adjusting methods: a case study on data from Uccle, Belgium, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 2319–2344, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2319-2022, 2022. a
Van Wagner, C. E.: Development and structure of the Canadian forest fire weather index system, vol. 35, https://ostrnrcan-dostrncan.canada.ca/handle/1845/228434 (last access: 25 September 2025), 1987. a
Vidal, J.-P., Martin, E., Franchistéguy, L., Baillon, M., and Soubeyroux, J.-M.: A 50-year high-resolution atmospheric reanalysis over France with the Safran system, Int. J. Climatol., 30, 1627–1644, 2010. a
Vogel, E., Johnson, F., Marshall, L., Bende-Michl, U., Wilson, L., Peter, J. R., Wasko, C., Srikanthan, S., Sharples, W., Dowdy, A., Hope, P., Khan, Z., Mehrotra, R., Sharma, A., Matic, V., Oke, A., Turner, M., Thomas, S., Donnelly, C., and Duong, V. C.: An evaluation framework for downscaling and bias correction in climate change impact studies, J. Hydrol, 622, 129693, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129693, 2023. a
Vorogushyn, S., Bates, P. D., de Bruijn, K., Castellarin, A., Kreibich, H., Priest, S., Schröter, K., Bagli, S., Blöschl, G., Domeneghetti, A., Gouldby, B., Klijn, F., Lammersen, R., Neal, J. C., Ridder, N., Terink, W., Viavattene, C., Viglione, A., Zanardo, S., and Merz, B.: Evolutionary leap in large-scale flood risk assessment needed, WIREs Water, 5, e1266, https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1266, 2018. a
Vrac, M. and Thao, S.: R2D2 v2.0: accounting for temporal dependences in multivariate bias correction via analogue rank resampling, Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 5367–5387, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5367-2020, 2020. a, b, c
Vrac, M., Drobinski, P., Merlo, A., Herrmann, M., Lavaysse, C., Li, L., and Somot, S.: Dynamical and statistical downscaling of the French Mediterranean climate: uncertainty assessment, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 12, 2769–2784, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-2769-2012, 2012. a
Vrac, M., Noël, T., and Vautard, R.: Bias correction of precipitation through Singularity Stochastic Removal: Because occurrences matter, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 5237–5258, 2016. a
Vrac, M., Thao, S., and Yiou, P.: Should multivariate bias corrections of climate simulations account for changes of rank correlation over time?, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 127, e2022JD036562, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD036562, 2022.
Vrac, M., Thao, S., and Yiou, P.: Changes in temperature-precipitation correlations over Europe: are climate models reliable?, Clim. Dynam., 60, 2713–2733, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-022-06436-5, 2023.
Wang, X., Wotton, B. M., Cantin, A. S., Parisien, M.-A., Anderson, K., Moore, B., and Flannigan, M. D.: cffdrs: an R package for the Canadian forest fire danger rating system, Ecol. Process., 6, 1–11, 2017. a
Wheeler, T. and von Braun, J.: Climate Change Impacts on Global Food Security, Science, 341, 508–513, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1239402, 2013. a
Wilcke, R. A. I., Mendlik, T., and Gobiet, A.: Multi-variable error correction of regional climate models, Clim. Change, 120, 871–887, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0845-x, 2013. a
Xu, C.-Y.: From GCMs to river flow: A review of downscaling methods and hydrologic modelling approaches, Prog. Phys. Geog., 23, 229–249, https://doi.org/10.1177/030913339902300204, 1999. a
Yang, W., Gardelin, M., Olsson, J., and Bosshard, T.: Multi-variable bias correction: application of forest fire risk in present and future climate in Sweden, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 2037–2057, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-2037-2015, 2015. a
Zhang, S., Hao, X., Zhao, Z., Zhang, J., Fan, X., and Li, X.: Natural Vegetation Succession Under Climate Change and the Combined Effects on Net Primary Productivity, Earth's Future, 11, e2023EF003903, https://doi.org/10.1029/2023EF003903, 2023. a
Zhu, P., Burney, J., Chang, J., Jin, Z., Mueller, N. D., Xin, Q., Xu, J., Yu, L., Makowski, D., and Ciais, P.: Warming reduces global agricultural production by decreasing cropping frequency and yields, Nat. Clim. Change, 12, 1016–1023, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-022-01492-5, 2022. a
Zscheischler, J., Fischer, E. M., and Lange, S.: The effect of univariate bias adjustment on multivariate hazard estimates, Earth Syst. Dynam., 10, 31–43, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-10-31-2019, 2019. a, b
Short summary
Atmospheric variables from climate models often present biases relative to the past. In order to use these models to assess the impact of climate change on processes of interest, it is necessary to correct these biases. We tested several Multivariate Bias Correction Methods (MBCMs) for 5 physical variables that are input variables for 4 process models. We provide recommendations regarding the use of MBCMs when multivariate and time dependent processes are involved.
Atmospheric variables from climate models often present biases relative to the past. In order to...
