Articles | Volume 29, issue 16
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-3907-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.Technical note: Spectral correction for cavity ring-down isotope analysis of plant and soil waters
Download
- Final revised paper (published on 22 Aug 2025)
- Supplement to the final revised paper
- Preprint (discussion started on 07 Mar 2025)
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor
| : Report abuse
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-949', Anonymous Referee #1, 14 Apr 2025
- AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Gabriel Bowen, 21 Apr 2025
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-949', Anonymous Referee #2, 15 Apr 2025
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Gabriel Bowen, 21 Apr 2025
- AC3: 'Reply on AC2', Gabriel Bowen, 24 Apr 2025
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Gabriel Bowen, 21 Apr 2025
- AC4: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-949', Gabriel Bowen, 24 Apr 2025
Peer review completion
AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision | EF: Editorial file upload
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (further review by editor) (15 May 2025) by Natalie Orlowski

AR by Gabriel Bowen on behalf of the Authors (21 May 2025)
Author's response
Author's tracked changes
Manuscript
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by editor) (03 Jun 2025) by Natalie Orlowski

AR by Gabriel Bowen on behalf of the Authors (08 Jun 2025)
Author's response
Author's tracked changes
Manuscript
ED: Publish as is (17 Jun 2025) by Natalie Orlowski

AR by Gabriel Bowen on behalf of the Authors (17 Jun 2025)
Manuscript
Comment on Technical note: Spectral correction for cavity ringdown isotope analysis of plant and soil waters
Authors: Gabriel J. Bowen, Sagarika Banerjee, and Suvankar Chakraborty
General comments:
In the manuscript by Bowen et al. the authors present a post-correction method to correct for the spectral bias in isotope data of laser-based (CRDS) isotope analyzers. Two instruments of the same type were used to analyze cryogenically extracted soil and plant water from around 1200 plant and 700 soil samples. For a subset, IRMS data were also available and assumed to represent the ‘true’ values. The authors applied and optimized models for the two isotopes separately where the isotopic bias is described as a function of 5 relevant metrics, reflecting potential contamination. The R-codes are available on zenodo.
The spectral interference problem was already described 15 years ago, but correction schemes are still not provided by the manufacturers. Removal of contaminants or flagging of suspicious data are the main focus. Several individual post-correction approaches have been published and some of them might be broadly useful.
Against this, in this study several relevant metrics are used for optimal models and beyond this, applied to a large and diverse dataset. Therefore, this work will highly be appreciated by the community.
In general, the manuscript is very well written, well structured and easy to follow.
I therefore recommend publication with only some minor revisions.
Specific Comments:
L 38 and throughout the manuscript: please check the order of the references (oldest – newest)
Figure 1: The symbols for “corrected” are quite large and probably overlap a lot of symbols of the “raw” data. I suggest reducing the symbolsize
L 119: Wouldn’t it be impressive to show a few selected plant species where the correction was highly effective in a separate figure?
Technical corrections:
L 203: There is something missing in the table caption after ”…spectral”