Articles | Volume 29, issue 13
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2811-2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2811-2025
Research article
 | 
04 Jul 2025
Research article |  | 04 Jul 2025

Assessing the adequacy of traditional hydrological models for climate change impact studies: a case for long short-term memory (LSTM) neural networks

Jean-Luc Martel, François Brissette, Richard Arsenault, Richard Turcotte, Mariana Castañeda-Gonzalez, William Armstrong, Edouard Mailhot, Jasmine Pelletier-Dumont, Gabriel Rondeau-Genesse, and Louis-Philippe Caron

Viewed

Total article views: 1,691 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
720 318 653 1,691 75 24 20
  • HTML: 720
  • PDF: 318
  • XML: 653
  • Total: 1,691
  • Supplement: 75
  • BibTeX: 24
  • EndNote: 20
Views and downloads (calculated since 05 Aug 2024)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 05 Aug 2024)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,691 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,691 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 04 Jul 2025
Download
Short summary
This study compares long short-term memory (LSTM) neural networks with traditional hydrological models to predict future streamflow under climate change. Using data from 148 catchments, it finds that LSTM models, which learn from extensive data sequences, perform differently and often better than traditional hydrological models. The continental LSTM model, which includes data from diverse climate zones, is particularly effective for understanding climate impacts on water resources.
Share