Articles | Volume 29, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1221-2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-1221-2025
Research article
 | 
04 Mar 2025
Research article |  | 04 Mar 2025

Impact of runoff schemes on global flow discharge: a comprehensive analysis using the Noah-MP and CaMa-Flood models

Mohamed Hamitouche, Giorgia Fosser, Alessandro Anav, Cenlin He, and Tzu-Shun Lin

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on hess-2024-264', Anonymous Referee #1, 16 Oct 2024
    • AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Mohamed Hamitouche, 06 Nov 2024
  • RC2: 'Comment on hess-2024-264', Anonymous Referee #2, 17 Oct 2024
    • AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Mohamed Hamitouche, 06 Nov 2024

Peer review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision | EF: Editorial file upload
ED: Publish subject to revisions (further review by editor and referees) (13 Nov 2024) by Alexander Gruber
AR by Mohamed Hamitouche on behalf of the Authors (16 Nov 2024)  Author's response   Author's tracked changes   Manuscript 
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (27 Nov 2024) by Alexander Gruber
RR by Anonymous Referee #1 (28 Dec 2024)
RR by Anonymous Referee #2 (28 Dec 2024)
ED: Publish as is (09 Jan 2025) by Alexander Gruber
AR by Mohamed Hamitouche on behalf of the Authors (10 Jan 2025)
Download
Short summary
This study evaluates how different methods of simulating runoff impact river flow predictions globally. By comparing seven approaches within the Noah-Multi-parameterisation (Noah-MP) land surface model, we found significant differences in accuracy, with some methods underestimating or overestimating runoff. The results are crucial for improving water resource management and flood prediction. Our work highlights the need for precise modelling to better prepare for climate-related challenges.
Share