Articles | Volume 27, issue 19
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3621-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Technical note: NASAaccess – a tool for access, reformatting, and visualization of remotely sensed earth observation and climate data
Download
- Final revised paper (published on 13 Oct 2023)
- Preprint (discussion started on 27 Feb 2023)
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor
| : Report abuse
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-328', Anonymous Referee #1, 27 Mar 2023
- AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Ibrahim Mohammed, 12 May 2023
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2023-328', Anonymous Referee #2, 11 Apr 2023
- AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Ibrahim Mohammed, 12 May 2023
Peer review completion
AR – Author's response | RR – Referee report | ED – Editor decision | EF – Editorial file upload
ED: Publish subject to revisions (further review by editor and referees) (15 May 2023) by Lixin Wang
AR by Ibrahim Mohammed on behalf of the Authors (15 May 2023)
Author's response
Author's tracked changes
EF by Daria Karpachova (17 May 2023)
Manuscript
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (22 May 2023) by Lixin Wang
RR by Xiaohui Qiao (28 Jun 2023)
ED: Publish as is (05 Aug 2023) by Lixin Wang
AR by Ibrahim Mohammed on behalf of the Authors (07 Sep 2023)
Manuscript
The authors developed an open-source package to ease the access, reformat, and visualization of remote sensing earth observation data from NASA, to facilitate data dissemination, assist hydrological modeling, and support decision making. The package currently supports multiple NASA climate datasets, and the reformatted data could be seamlessly ingested into several mainstream hydrological models. The manuscript has clearly described the functionalities and methodology of the package, and given detailed instructions on installation requirements and steps, as well as how to use it with a case study. All the technical instructions are easy to follow. Also, the package has already been demonstrated in two published articles. Below are comments that suggest the authors to address.
1. What are the benefits of NASAaccess comparing with existing tools listed in Table 1? In Table 1, it would help if you could list more information of existing tools to illustrate the necessity and benefits of NASAaccess, such as open source or not, supported datasets, programming language, operation system, and other pros and cons related to the purpose of this work.
2. For some abbreviations, please only give full name when one item is first time mentioned in the manuscript, for examples, NASA on Page 3 and 16, GeoGloWS on Page 17, GLDAS on Page 15, GES on Page 28, 29, and 30, DISC on Page 28, 29, and 30, CMIP on Page 18, 24, and 26 (twice), OSSI on Page 16, SWAT on Page 6, etc.
3. In Section 3.1, these three functions in NASAaccess are mentioned here for the first time. Please explain them here for readers to better understand or give a note to inform readers to find “further explanation in XXXX of the Appendix”?
4. In Section 3.1, please give full name and explain the “data of IMERG”. It would be better to give the website of IMERG data https://gpm.nasa.gov/data/imerg
5. Where can readers find the shapefile and DEM for the case study?
6. Is there any limitation on how long the data could be retrieved? For years of data, how long it would take with different functions?