Articles | Volume 27, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-331-2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-331-2023
Research article
 | 
18 Jan 2023
Research article |  | 18 Jan 2023

Intercomparison of global reanalysis precipitation for flood risk modelling

Fergus McClean, Richard Dawson, and Chris Kilsby

Related authors

Assessing rainfall radar errors with an inverse stochastic modelling framework
Amy C. Green, Chris Kilsby, and András Bárdossy
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4539–4558, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4539-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4539-2024, 2024
Short summary
Non-asymptotic distributions of water extremes: Superlative or superfluous?
Francesco Serinaldi, Federico Lombardo, and Chris G. Kilsby
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2023-234,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2023-234, 2023
Revised manuscript accepted for HESS
Short summary
Improving sub-seasonal forecast skill of meteorological drought: a weather pattern approach
Doug Richardson, Hayley J. Fowler, Christopher G. Kilsby, Robert Neal, and Rutger Dankers
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 107–124, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-107-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-107-2020, 2020
Short summary
Costs of sea dikes – regressions and uncertainty estimates
Stephan Lenk, Diego Rybski, Oliver Heidrich, Richard J. Dawson, and Jürgen P. Kropp
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 765–779, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-765-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-765-2017, 2017
Short summary
Adaptation of water resource systems to an uncertain future
Claire L. Walsh, Stephen Blenkinsop, Hayley J. Fowler, Aidan Burton, Richard J. Dawson, Vassilis Glenis, Lucy J. Manning, Golnaz Jahanshahi, and Chris G. Kilsby
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 1869–1884, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-1869-2016,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-1869-2016, 2016
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Engineering Hydrology | Techniques and Approaches: Uncertainty analysis
A more comprehensive uncertainty framework for historical flood frequency analysis: a 500-year long case study
Mathieu Lucas, Michel Lang, Benjamin Renard, and Jérôme Le Coz
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-50,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-50, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for HESS
Short summary
Bayesian calibration of a flood simulator using binary flood extent observations
Mariano Balbi and David Charles Bonaventure Lallemant
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1089–1108, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1089-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1089-2023, 2023
Short summary
Seamless streamflow forecasting at daily to monthly scales: MuTHRE lets you have your cake and eat it too
David McInerney, Mark Thyer, Dmitri Kavetski, Richard Laugesen, Fitsum Woldemeskel, Narendra Tuteja, and George Kuczera
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5669–5683, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5669-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5669-2022, 2022
Short summary
An uncertainty partition approach for inferring interactive hydrologic risks
Yurui Fan, Kai Huang, Guohe Huang, Yongping Li, and Feng Wang
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 4601–4624, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4601-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4601-2020, 2020
Predicting discharge capacity of vegetated compound channels: uncertainty and identifiability of one-dimensional process-based models
Adam Kiczko, Kaisa Västilä, Adam Kozioł, Janusz Kubrak, Elżbieta Kubrak, and Marcin Krukowski
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 4135–4167, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4135-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4135-2020, 2020
Short summary

Cited articles

Addy, S. and Wilkinson, M. E.: Embankment lowering and natural self-recovery improves river-floodplain hydro-geomorphic connectivity of a gravel bed river, Sci. Total Environ., 770, 144626, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144626, 2021. 
Albergel, C., Dutra, E., Munier, S., Calvet, J.-C., Munoz-Sabater, J., de Rosnay, P., and Balsamo, G.: ERA-5 and ERA-Interim driven ISBA land surface model simulations: which one performs better?, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 3515–3532, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-3515-2018, 2018. 
Alfieri, L., Burek, P., Dutra, E., Krzeminski, B., Muraro, D., Thielen, J., and Pappenberger, F.: GloFAS – global ensemble streamflow forecasting and flood early warning, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 1161–1175, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-1161-2013, 2013. 
Andreadis, K. M., Schumann, G. J.-P., Stampoulis, D., Bates, P. D., Brakenridge, G. R., and Kettner, A. J.: Can Atmospheric Reanalysis Data Sets Be Used to Reproduce Flooding Over Large Scales?, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 10369-10377, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL075502, 2017. 
Arshad, M., Ma, X., Yin, J., Ullah, W., Liu, M., and Ullah, I.: Performance evaluation of ERA-5, JRA-55, MERRA-2, and CFS-2 reanalysis datasets, over diverse climate regions of Pakistan, Weather Clim. Extrem., 33, 100373, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wace.2021.100373, 2021. 
Download
Short summary
Reanalysis datasets are increasingly used to drive flood models, especially for continental and global analysis. We investigate the impact of using four reanalysis products on simulations of past flood events. All reanalysis products underestimated the number of buildings inundated, compared to a benchmark national dataset. These findings show that while global reanalyses provide a useful resource for flood modelling where no other data are available, they may underestimate impact in some cases.