Articles | Volume 26, issue 23
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-6207-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-6207-2022
Research article
 | 
12 Dec 2022
Research article |  | 12 Dec 2022

Accuracy of five ground heat flux empirical simulation methods in the surface-energy-balance-based remote-sensing evapotranspiration models

Zhaofei Liu

Viewed

Total article views: 5,744 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
4,024 1,588 132 5,744 663 468 485
  • HTML: 4,024
  • PDF: 1,588
  • XML: 132
  • Total: 5,744
  • Supplement: 663
  • BibTeX: 468
  • EndNote: 485
Views and downloads (calculated since 19 Apr 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 19 Apr 2022)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 5,744 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 5,521 with geography defined and 223 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Saved (final revised paper)

Latest update: 17 Jun 2026
Download
Short summary
Ground heat flux (G) accounts for a significant fraction of the surface energy balance (SEB), but there is insufficient research on these models compared with other flux. The accuracy of G simulation methods in the SEB-based remote sensing evapotranspiration models is evaluated. Results show that the accuracy of each method varied significantly at different sites and at half-hour intervals. Further improvement of G simulations is recommended for the remote sensing evapotranspiration modelers.
Share