Articles | Volume 26, issue 23
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-6207-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-6207-2022
Research article
 | 
12 Dec 2022
Research article |  | 12 Dec 2022

Accuracy of five ground heat flux empirical simulation methods in the surface-energy-balance-based remote-sensing evapotranspiration models

Zhaofei Liu

Viewed

Total article views: 5,887 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
4,079 1,667 141 5,887 685 474 497
  • HTML: 4,079
  • PDF: 1,667
  • XML: 141
  • Total: 5,887
  • Supplement: 685
  • BibTeX: 474
  • EndNote: 497
Views and downloads (calculated since 19 Apr 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 19 Apr 2022)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 5,887 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 5,622 with geography defined and 265 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Saved (final revised paper)

Latest update: 20 Aug 2026
Download
Short summary
Ground heat flux (G) accounts for a significant fraction of the surface energy balance (SEB), but there is insufficient research on these models compared with other flux. The accuracy of G simulation methods in the SEB-based remote sensing evapotranspiration models is evaluated. Results show that the accuracy of each method varied significantly at different sites and at half-hour intervals. Further improvement of G simulations is recommended for the remote sensing evapotranspiration modelers.
Share