Articles | Volume 26, issue 13
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3377-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3377-2022
Research article
 | 
05 Jul 2022
Research article |  | 05 Jul 2022

Deep learning rainfall–runoff predictions of extreme events

Jonathan M. Frame, Frederik Kratzert, Daniel Klotz, Martin Gauch, Guy Shalev, Oren Gilon, Logan M. Qualls, Hoshin V. Gupta, and Grey S. Nearing

Viewed

Total article views: 6,437 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
4,201 2,172 64 6,437 65 55
  • HTML: 4,201
  • PDF: 2,172
  • XML: 64
  • Total: 6,437
  • BibTeX: 65
  • EndNote: 55
Views and downloads (calculated since 18 Aug 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 18 Aug 2021)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 6,437 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 5,993 with geography defined and 444 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 26 Sep 2023
Download

The requested paper has a corresponding corrigendum published. Please read the corrigendum first before downloading the article.

Short summary
The most accurate rainfall–runoff predictions are currently based on deep learning. There is a concern among hydrologists that deep learning models may not be reliable in extrapolation or for predicting extreme events. This study tests that hypothesis. The deep learning models remained relatively accurate in predicting extreme events compared with traditional models, even when extreme events were not included in the training set.