Articles | Volume 26, issue 8
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2301-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2301-2022
Review article
 | 
02 May 2022
Review article |  | 02 May 2022

To which extent are socio-hydrology studies truly integrative? The case of natural hazards and disaster research

Franciele Maria Vanelli, Masato Kobiyama, and Mariana Madruga de Brito

Viewed

Total article views: 5,456 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
3,600 1,734 122 5,456 242 120 137
  • HTML: 3,600
  • PDF: 1,734
  • XML: 122
  • Total: 5,456
  • Supplement: 242
  • BibTeX: 120
  • EndNote: 137
Views and downloads (calculated since 23 Dec 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 23 Dec 2021)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 5,456 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 5,082 with geography defined and 374 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Saved (final revised paper)

Latest update: 05 Aug 2026
Download
Short summary
We conducted a systematic literature review of socio-hydrological studies applied to natural hazards and disaster research. Results indicate that there is a wide range of understanding of what social means in socio-hydrology, and monodisciplinary studies prevail. We expect to encourage socio-hydrologists to investigate different disasters using a more integrative approach that combines natural and social sciences tools by involving stakeholders and broadening the use of mixed methods.
Share