Articles | Volume 26, issue 8
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2301-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2301-2022
Review article
 | 
02 May 2022
Review article |  | 02 May 2022

To which extent are socio-hydrology studies truly integrative? The case of natural hazards and disaster research

Franciele Maria Vanelli, Masato Kobiyama, and Mariana Madruga de Brito

Viewed

Total article views: 3,428 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
2,237 1,142 49 3,428 142 45 54
  • HTML: 2,237
  • PDF: 1,142
  • XML: 49
  • Total: 3,428
  • Supplement: 142
  • BibTeX: 45
  • EndNote: 54
Views and downloads (calculated since 23 Dec 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 23 Dec 2021)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 3,428 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 3,125 with geography defined and 303 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 26 Jul 2024
Download
Short summary
We conducted a systematic literature review of socio-hydrological studies applied to natural hazards and disaster research. Results indicate that there is a wide range of understanding of what social means in socio-hydrology, and monodisciplinary studies prevail. We expect to encourage socio-hydrologists to investigate different disasters using a more integrative approach that combines natural and social sciences tools by involving stakeholders and broadening the use of mixed methods.