Articles | Volume 26, issue 8
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2301-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2301-2022
Review article
 | 
02 May 2022
Review article |  | 02 May 2022

To which extent are socio-hydrology studies truly integrative? The case of natural hazards and disaster research

Franciele Maria Vanelli, Masato Kobiyama, and Mariana Madruga de Brito

Viewed

Total article views: 3,108 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,976 1,092 40 3,108 94 36 39
  • HTML: 1,976
  • PDF: 1,092
  • XML: 40
  • Total: 3,108
  • Supplement: 94
  • BibTeX: 36
  • EndNote: 39
Views and downloads (calculated since 23 Dec 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 23 Dec 2021)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 3,108 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,809 with geography defined and 299 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 11 Apr 2024
Download
Short summary
We conducted a systematic literature review of socio-hydrological studies applied to natural hazards and disaster research. Results indicate that there is a wide range of understanding of what social means in socio-hydrology, and monodisciplinary studies prevail. We expect to encourage socio-hydrologists to investigate different disasters using a more integrative approach that combines natural and social sciences tools by involving stakeholders and broadening the use of mixed methods.