Articles | Volume 26, issue 8
Review article
02 May 2022
Review article |  | 02 May 2022

To which extent are socio-hydrology studies truly integrative? The case of natural hazards and disaster research

Franciele Maria Vanelli, Masato Kobiyama, and Mariana Madruga de Brito


Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on hess-2021-638', Anonymous Referee #1, 11 Jan 2022
    • AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Franciele Maria Vanelli, 24 Jan 2022
  • RC2: 'Comment on hess-2021-638', Maurizio Mazzoleni, 15 Feb 2022
    • AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Franciele Maria Vanelli, 17 Mar 2022

Peer review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision | EF: Editorial file upload
ED: Publish subject to revisions (further review by editor and referees) (17 Mar 2022) by Thomas Thaler
AR by Franciele Maria Vanelli on behalf of the Authors (17 Mar 2022)  Author's response   Author's tracked changes   Manuscript 
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (18 Mar 2022) by Thomas Thaler
RR by Anonymous Referee #1 (18 Mar 2022)
RR by Maurizio Mazzoleni (01 Apr 2022)
ED: Publish as is (01 Apr 2022) by Thomas Thaler
AR by Franciele Maria Vanelli on behalf of the Authors (06 Apr 2022)  Manuscript 
Short summary
We conducted a systematic literature review of socio-hydrological studies applied to natural hazards and disaster research. Results indicate that there is a wide range of understanding of what social means in socio-hydrology, and monodisciplinary studies prevail. We expect to encourage socio-hydrologists to investigate different disasters using a more integrative approach that combines natural and social sciences tools by involving stakeholders and broadening the use of mixed methods.