Articles | Volume 25, issue 12
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-6359-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-6359-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Calibrating 1D hydrodynamic river models in the absence of cross-section geometry using satellite observations of water surface elevation and river width
School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, 518055, China
Department of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of
Denmark, 2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark
Silja Westphal Christensen
Department of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of
Denmark, 2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark
Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Technical
University of Denmark, 2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark
Peter Bauer-Gottwein
Department of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of
Denmark, 2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark
Related authors
Xinyu Chen, Liguang Jiang, Yuning Luo, and Junguo Liu
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 4463–4479, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-4463-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-4463-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
River flow is experiencing changes under the impacts of climate change and human activities. For example, flood events are occurring more often and are more destructive in many places worldwide. To deal with such issues, hydrologists endeavor to understand the features of extreme events as well as other hydrological changes. One key approach is analyzing flow characteristics, represented by hydrological indices. Building such a comprehensive global large-sample dataset is essential.
Monica Coppo Frias, Suxia Liu, Xingguo Mo, Karina Nielsen, Heidi Ranndal, Liguang Jiang, Jun Ma, and Peter Bauer-Gottwein
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1011–1032, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1011-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1011-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This paper uses remote sensing data from ICESat-2 to calibrate a 1D hydraulic model. With the model, we can make estimations of discharge and water surface elevation, which are important indicators in flooding risk assessment. ICESat-2 data give an added value, thanks to the 0.7 m resolution, which allows the measurement of narrow river streams. In addition, ICESat-2 provides measurements on the river dry portion geometry that can be included in the model.
Youjiang Shen, Dedi Liu, Liguang Jiang, Karina Nielsen, Jiabo Yin, Jun Liu, and Peter Bauer-Gottwein
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 5671–5694, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-5671-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-5671-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
A data gap of 338 Chinese reservoirs with their surface water area (SWA), water surface elevation (WSE), and reservoir water storage change (RWSC) during 2010–2021. Validation against the in situ observations of 93 reservoirs indicates the relatively high accuracy and reliability of the datasets. The unique and novel remotely sensed dataset would benefit studies involving many aspects (e.g., hydrological models, water resources related studies, and more).
Cecile M. M. Kittel, Liguang Jiang, Christian Tøttrup, and Peter Bauer-Gottwein
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 333–357, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-333-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-333-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
In poorly instrumented catchments, satellite altimetry offers a unique possibility to obtain water level observations. Improvements in instrument design have increased the capabilities of altimeters to observe inland water bodies, including rivers. In this study, we demonstrate how a dense Sentinel-3 water surface elevation monitoring network can be established at catchment scale using publicly accessible processing platforms. The network can serve as a useful supplement to ground observations.
Theerapol Charoensuk, Claudia Katrine Corvenius Lorentzen, Anne Beukel Bak, Jakob Luchner, Christian Tøttrup, and Peter Bauer-Gottwein
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 5065–5097, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-5065-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-5065-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The objective of this study is to enhance the performance of 1D–2D flood models using satellite Earth observation data. The main factor influencing a 1D–2D flood model is the accuracy of the digital elevation model (DEM). Two workflows are introduced to improve the 1D–2D flood model: (1) in the DEM analysis workflow, 10 DEM products are evaluated using the ICESat-2 ATL08 benchmark, while (2) in the flood map analysis workflow, flood extent maps derived from multi-mission satellite datasets are compared with simulated flood maps.
Xinyu Chen, Liguang Jiang, Yuning Luo, and Junguo Liu
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 4463–4479, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-4463-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-4463-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
River flow is experiencing changes under the impacts of climate change and human activities. For example, flood events are occurring more often and are more destructive in many places worldwide. To deal with such issues, hydrologists endeavor to understand the features of extreme events as well as other hydrological changes. One key approach is analyzing flow characteristics, represented by hydrological indices. Building such a comprehensive global large-sample dataset is essential.
Monica Coppo Frias, Suxia Liu, Xingguo Mo, Karina Nielsen, Heidi Ranndal, Liguang Jiang, Jun Ma, and Peter Bauer-Gottwein
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1011–1032, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1011-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1011-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This paper uses remote sensing data from ICESat-2 to calibrate a 1D hydraulic model. With the model, we can make estimations of discharge and water surface elevation, which are important indicators in flooding risk assessment. ICESat-2 data give an added value, thanks to the 0.7 m resolution, which allows the measurement of narrow river streams. In addition, ICESat-2 provides measurements on the river dry portion geometry that can be included in the model.
Youjiang Shen, Dedi Liu, Liguang Jiang, Karina Nielsen, Jiabo Yin, Jun Liu, and Peter Bauer-Gottwein
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 5671–5694, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-5671-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-5671-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
A data gap of 338 Chinese reservoirs with their surface water area (SWA), water surface elevation (WSE), and reservoir water storage change (RWSC) during 2010–2021. Validation against the in situ observations of 93 reservoirs indicates the relatively high accuracy and reliability of the datasets. The unique and novel remotely sensed dataset would benefit studies involving many aspects (e.g., hydrological models, water resources related studies, and more).
Cecile M. M. Kittel, Liguang Jiang, Christian Tøttrup, and Peter Bauer-Gottwein
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 333–357, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-333-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-333-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
In poorly instrumented catchments, satellite altimetry offers a unique possibility to obtain water level observations. Improvements in instrument design have increased the capabilities of altimeters to observe inland water bodies, including rivers. In this study, we demonstrate how a dense Sentinel-3 water surface elevation monitoring network can be established at catchment scale using publicly accessible processing platforms. The network can serve as a useful supplement to ground observations.
Cited articles
AIPo: http://geoportale.agenziapo.it/web/index.php/it/?option=com_aipografd3, last access: 15 December 2021.
Andreadis, K. M. and Schumann, G. J. P.: Estimating the impact of satellite
observations on the predictability of large-scale hydraulic models, Adv. Water Resour., 73, 44–54, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2014.06.006, 2014.
Annis, A., Nardi, F., Volpi, E., and Fiori, A.: Quantifying the relative impact of hydrological and hydraulic modelling parameterizations on uncertainty of inundation maps, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 65, 507–523,
https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2019.1709640, 2020.
Aster, R. C., Borchers, B., and Thurber, C. H.: Parameter estimation and
inverse problems, Elsevier, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 2018.
AVISO+: FTP, available at: https://www.aviso.altimetry.fr/en/data/data-access/ftp.html, last access: 15 December 2021.
Bandini, F., Sunding, T. P., Linde, J., Smith, O., Jensen, I. K., Köppl,
C. J., Butts, M., and Bauer-Gottwein, P.: Unmanned Aerial System (UAS)
observations of water surface elevation in a small stream: Comparison of radar altimetry, LIDAR and photogrammetry techniques, Remote Sens. Environ.,
237, 111487, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.111487, 2020.
Bates, P. D., Neal, J. C., Alsdorf, D., and Schumann, G. J.-P.: Observing
Global Surface Water Flood Dynamics, Surv. Geophys., 35, 839–852,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-013-9269-4, 2014.
Biancamaria, S., Lettenmaier, D. P., and Pavelsky, T. M.: The SWOT Mission
and Its Capabilities for Land Hydrology, Surv. Geophys., 37, 307–337,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-015-9346-y, 2016.
Bierkens, M. F. P.: Global hydrology 2015: State, trends, and directions,
Water Resour. Res., 51, 4923–4947, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017173, 2015.
Bjerklie, D. M., Moller, D., Smith, L. C., and Dingman, S. L.: Estimating
discharge in rivers using remotely sensed hydraulic information, J. Hydrol.,
309, 191–209, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.11.022, 2005.
Blöschl, G., Gaál, L., Hall, J., Kiss, A., Komma, J., Nester, T.,
Parajka, J., Perdigão, R. A. P., Plavcová, L., Rogger, M., Salinas,
J. L., and Viglione, A.: Increasing river floods: fiction or reality?, Wiley
Interdisciplin. Rev. Water, 2, 329–344, https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1079, 2015.
Brisset, P., Monnier, J., Garambois, P.-A., and Roux, H.: On the assimilation
of altimetric data in 1D Saint–Venant river flow models, Adv. Water Resour., 119, 41–59, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2018.06.004, 2018.
Broyden, C. G.: A class of methods for solving nonlinear simultaneous equations, Math. Comput., 19, 577–577, https://doi.org/10.1090/S0025-5718-1965-0198670-6, 1965.
Chow, V. Te: Open channel hydraulics, McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc, New York, 1959.
Dey, S., Saksena, S., and Merwade, V.: Assessing the effect of different
bathymetric models on hydraulic simulation of rivers in data sparse regions,
J. Hydrol., 575, 838–851, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.05.085, 2019.
DHI: MIKE HYDRO River – User Guide, DHI, Copenhagen, 2017.
Dingman, S. L.: Analytical derivation of at-a-station hydraulic–geometry
relations, J. Hydrol., 334, 17–27, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.09.021, 2007.
Domeneghetti, A.: On the use of SRTM and altimetry data for flood modeling in data-sparse regions, Water Resour. Res., 52, 2901–2918, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017967, 2016.
Domeneghetti, A., Tarpanelli, A., Brocca, L., Barbetta, S., Moramarco, T.,
Castellarin, A., and Brath, A.: The use of remote sensing-derived water
surface data for hydraulic model calibration, Remote Sens. Environ., 149,
130–141, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2014.04.007, 2014.
Durand, M., Andreadis, K. M., Alsdorf, D. E., Lettenmaier, D. P., Moller, D.,
and Wilson, M.: Estimation of bathymetric depth and slope from data assimilation of swath altimetry into a hydrodynamic model, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L20401, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL034150, 2008.
Ferguson, R. I.: Hydraulics and hydraulic geometry, Prog. Phys. Geogr. Earth
Environ., 10, 1–31, https://doi.org/10.1177/030913338601000101, 1986.
Fleischmann, A., Paiva, R., and Collischonn, W.: Can regional to continental
river hydrodynamic models be locally relevant? A cross-scale comparison, J.
Hydrol., 3, 100027, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydroa.2019.100027, 2019.
Fonstad, M. A. and Marcus, W. A.: Remote sensing of stream depths with
hydraulically assisted bathymetry (HAB) models, Geomorphology, 72, 320–339, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2005.06.005, 2005.
Garambois, P. A. and Monnier, J.: Inference of effective river properties
from remotely sensed observations of water surface, Adv. Water Resour., 79,
103–120, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2015.02.007, 2015.
Garambois, P.-A., Calmant, S., Roux, H., Paris, A., Monnier, J., Finaud-Guyot, P., Samine Montazem, A., and Santos da Silva, J.: Hydraulic
visibility: Using satellite altimetry to parameterize a hydraulic model of an ungauged reach of a braided river, Hydrol. Process., 31, 756–767,
https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.11033, 2017.
Garbrecht, J.: Analytical representation of cross-section hydraulic properties, J. Hydrol., 119, 43–56, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(90)90033-T, 1990.
Gleason, C. J.: Hydraulic geometry of natural rivers: A review and future
directions, Prog. Phys. Geogr., 39, 337–360, https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133314567584, 2015.
Gleason, C. J. and Durand, M. T.: Remote Sensing of River Discharge: A Review and a Framing for the Discipline, Remote Sens., 12, 1107, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12071107, 2020.
Grimaldi, S., Li, Y., Walker, J. P., and Pauwels, V. R. N.: Effective Representation of River Geometry in Hydraulic Flood Forecast Models, Water
Resour. Res., 54, 1031–1057, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR021765, 2018.
HYDROMETRI.DK: Vandløbssiden, available at: http://www.hydrometri.dk/hyd/, last access: 15 December 2021.
Jiang, L., Nielsen, K., Andersen, O. B., and Bauer-Gottwein, P.: CryoSat-2
radar altimetry for monitoring freshwater resources of China, Remote Sens.
Environ., 200, 125–139, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.08.015, 2017.
Jiang, L., Madsen, H., and Bauer-Gottwein, P.: Simultaneous calibration of
multiple hydrodynamic model parameters using satellite altimetry observations of water surface elevation in the Songhua River, Remote Sens. Environ., 225, 229–247, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.03.014, 2019.
Jiang, L., Bandini, F., Smith, O., Klint Jensen, I., and Bauer-Gottwein, P.:
The Value of Distributed High-Resolution UAV-Borne Observations of Water
Surface Elevation for River Management and Hydrodynamic Modeling, Remote Sens., 12, 1171, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12071171, 2020.
Jiang, L., Christensen, S. W., and Bauer-Gottwein, P.: Calibrating 1D hydrodynamic river models in the absence of cross-section geometry in DHI MIKE HYDRO, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5782990, 2021.
Larnier, K., Monnier, J., Garambois, P. A., and Verley, J.: River discharge
and bathymetry estimation from SWOT altimetry measurements, Inverse Probl.
Sci. Eng., 29, 759–789, https://doi.org/10.1080/17415977.2020.1803858, 2021.
Legleiter, C. J.: Calibrating remotely sensed river bathymetry in the absence of field measurements: Flow REsistance Equation-Based Imaging of River Depths (FREEBIRD), Water Resour. Res., 51, 2865–2884, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR016624, 2015.
Leopold, L. B. and Maddock, T. J.: The Hydraulic Geometry of Stream Channels
and Some Physiographic Implications, Geol. Surv. Prof. Pap. 252, United States Government Printing Office, Washington, 1–57, 1953.
Liu, G., Schwartz, F. W., Tseng, K.-H., and Shum, C. K.: Discharge and
water-depth estimates for ungauged rivers: Combining hydrologic, hydraulic,
and inverse modeling with stage and water-area measurements from satellites,
Water Resour. Res., 51, 6017–6035, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR016971, 2015.
Madsen, K., Nielsen, H. B., and Tingleff, O.: Methods for Non-Linear Least
Squares Problems, in: Lecture note, Informatics and Mathematical Modelling, 2nd Edn., Technical University of Denmark, 2004.
Marquardt, D. W.: An Algorithm for Least-Squares Estimation of Nonlinear
Parameters, J. Soc. Ind. Appl. Math., 11, 431–441, https://doi.org/10.1137/0111030,
1963.
Mejia, A. I. and Reed, S. M.: Evaluating the effects of parameterized
cross-section shapes and simplified routing with a coupled distributed
hydrologic and hydraulic model, J. Hydrol., 409, 512–524,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.08.050, 2011.
Mersel, M. K., Smith, L. C., Andreadis, K. M., and Durand, M. T.: Estimation
of river depth from remotely sensed hydraulic relationships, Water Resour.
Res., 49, 3165–3179, https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20176, 2013.
Michailovsky, C. I., McEnnis, S., Berry, P. A. M., Smith, R., and Bauer-Gottwein, P.: River monitoring from satellite radar altimetry in the
Zambezi River basin, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 2181–2192,
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-2181-2012, 2012.
Milzow, C., Krogh, P. E., and Bauer-Gottwein, P.: Combining satellite radar
altimetry, SAR surface soil moisture and GRACE total storage changes for
hydrological model calibration in a large poorly gauged catchment, Hydrol.
Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 1729–1743, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-1729-2011, 2011.
Moramarco, T., Barbetta, S., Bjerklie, D. M., Fulton, J. W., and Tarpanelli,
A.: River Bathymetry Estimate and Discharge Assessment from Remote Sensing,
Water Resour. Res., 55, 6692–6711, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR024220, 2019.
Neal, J., Schumann, G., and Bates, P.: A subgrid channel model for simulating
river hydraulics and floodplain inundation over large and data sparse areas,
Water Resour. Res., 48, 1–16, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012WR012514, 2012.
Neal, J. C., Odoni, N. A., Trigg, M. A., Freer, J. E., Garcia-pintado, J.,
Mason, D. C., Wood, M., and Bates, P. D.: Efficient incorporation of channel
cross-section geometry uncertainty into regional and global scale flood
inundation models, J. Hydrol., 529, 169–183, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.07.026, 2015.
Nielsen, H. B. and Völcker, C.: IMMOPTIBOX: A Matlab Toolbox for
Optimization and Data Fitting, available at: http://www2.imm.dtu.dk/projects/immoptibox/ (last access: 15 December 2021), 2010.
Pappenberger, F., Beven, K., Frodsham, K., Romanowicz, R., and Matgen, P.:
Grasping the unavoidable subjectivity in calibration of flood inundation
models: A vulnerability weighted approach, J. Hydrol., 333, 275–287,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.08.017, 2007.
Pereverzyev, S. S., Pinnau, R., and Siedow, N.: Regularized fixed-point
iterations for non-linear inverse problems, Inverse Probl., 22, 1–22,
https://doi.org/10.1088/0266-5611/22/1/001, 2006.
Schaperow, J. R., Li, D., Margulis, S. A., and Lettenmaier, D. P.: A
Curve-Fitting Method for Estimating Bathymetry From Water Surface Height and
Width, Water Resour. Res., 55, 4288–4303, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR024938, 2019.
Schmidt, M.: Least Squares Optimization with L1-Norm Regularization, Proj. Rep. 98, 230–238, available at:
https://www.cs.ubc.ca/~schmidtm/Software/lasso.html (last access: 15 December 2021), 2005.
Schneider, R., Godiksen, P. N., Villadsen, H., Madsen, H., and Bauer-Gottwein, P.: Application of CryoSat-2 altimetry data for river analysis and modelling, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 751–764,
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-751-2017, 2017.
Schneider, R., Ridler, M. E., Godiksen, P. N., Madsen, H., and Bauer-Gottwein, P.: A data assimilation system combining CryoSat-2 data and
hydrodynamic river models, J. Hydrol., 557, 197–210,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.11.052, 2018.
Schumann, G., Matgen, P., Hoffmann, L., Hostache, R., Pappenberger, F., and
Pfister, L.: Deriving distributed roughness values from satellite radar data
for flood inundation modelling, J. Hydrol., 344, 96–111,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.06.024, 2007.
Songliao River Conservancy Commission: The Songhua River, Changchun, China,
2004.
Songliao River Conservancy Commission: Water resources bulletin of Songhua & Liao River, Changchun, China, available at:
http://www.slwr.gov.cn/ (last access: 15 December 2021), 2015.
Sun, W. C., Ishidaira, H., and Bastola, S.: Towards improving river discharge
estimation in ungauged basins: Calibration of rainfall-runoff models based
on satellite observations of river flow width at basin outlet, Hydrol. Earth
Syst. Sci., 14, 2011–2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-2011-2010, 2010.
Ward, P. J., Jongman, B., Salamon, P., Simpson, A., Bates, P., De Groeve, T., Muis, S., de Perez, E. C., Rudari, R., Trigg, M. A., and Winsemius, H. C.: Usefulness and limitations of global flood risk models, Nat. Clim. Change, 5, 712–715, https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2742, 2015.
Yamazaki, D., Kanae, S., Kim, H., and Oki, T.: A physically based description
of floodplain inundation dynamics in a global river routing model, Water
Resour. Res., 47, W04501, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010WR009726, 2011.
Yang, X., Pavelsky, T. M., Allen, G. H., and Donchyts, G.: RivWidthCloud: An
Automated Google Earth Engine Algorithm for River Width Extraction From Remotely Sensed Imagery, IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett., 17, 217–221,
https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2019.2920225, 2020.
Short summary
River roughness and geometry are essential to hydraulic river models. However, measurements of these quantities are not available in most rivers globally. Nevertheless, simultaneous calibration of channel geometric parameters and roughness is difficult as they compensate for each other. This study introduces an alternative approach of parameterization and calibration that reduces parameter correlations by combining cross-section geometry and roughness into a conveyance parameter.
River roughness and geometry are essential to hydraulic river models. However, measurements of...