Articles | Volume 25, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5399-2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5399-2021
Technical note
 | 
07 Oct 2021
Technical note |  | 07 Oct 2021

Technical note: Evaporating water is different from bulk soil water in δ2H and δ18O and has implications for evaporation calculation

Hongxiu Wang, Jingjing Jin, Buli Cui, Bingcheng Si, Xiaojun Ma, and Mingyi Wen

Viewed

Total article views: 2,827 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,904 844 79 2,827 176 51 50
  • HTML: 1,904
  • PDF: 844
  • XML: 79
  • Total: 2,827
  • Supplement: 176
  • BibTeX: 51
  • EndNote: 50
Views and downloads (calculated since 26 Jan 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 26 Jan 2021)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,827 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,657 with geography defined and 170 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 12 Oct 2024
Download
Short summary
Evaporation led to progressively more heavy-isotope-enriched bulk soil water (BW) following the precipitation/irrigation of heavy-isotope-depleted new water but causes progressively more heavy-isotope-depleted BW following irrigation of heavy-isotope-enriched new water. The results indicated that δ2H and δ18O in evaporating water (EW) were similar to new water and differed from BW. However, the evaporative water loss calculated from BW did not differ significantly from that of EW.