Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
HESS
Articles | Volume 25, issue 6
Articles | Volume 25, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-2997-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-2997-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 25, issue 6
Research article
 | 
03 Jun 2021
Research article |  | 03 Jun 2021

Evaluation of random forests for short-term daily streamflow forecasting in rainfall- and snowmelt-driven watersheds

Leo Triet Pham, Lifeng Luo, and Andrew Finley

Viewed

Total article views: 160,310 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
82,105 78,082 123 160,310 449 133 156
  • HTML: 82,105
  • PDF: 78,082
  • XML: 123
  • Total: 160,310
  • Supplement: 449
  • BibTeX: 133
  • EndNote: 156
Views and downloads (calculated since 23 Jun 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 23 Jun 2020)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 160,310 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 147,064 with geography defined and 13,246 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 05 Feb 2026
Download
Short summary
Model evaluation metrics suggest that RF performs better in snowmelt-driven watersheds. The largest improvements in forecasts compared to benchmark models are found among rainfall-driven watersheds. RF performance deteriorates with increases in catchment slope and soil sandiness. We note disagreement between two popular measures of RF variable importance and recommend jointly considering these measures with the physical processes under study.
Read more
Share