Dear Authors,
As mentioned in my previous comment, we received 2 critical review reports on your manuscript. Both reviewers recognize the novelty of the study and recognize the potential of gravimeter and tilt measurements for unravelling hydrological processes. Yet both reviewers raise major concerns on the readibility of the manuscript, in particular for a hydrological audiance. Both reviewers also made suggestions to shape the manuscript so that it becomes aligned with the profile of HESS readership. Both reviewers also made detailed suggestions on more specific aspects. I concurr with these review reports and suggest you to proceed with your replies and major revision of your manuscript. The revised manuscript will be send out for review again to the original reviewers.
Regards,

Dear,
The revised paper HESS2020-316 has been evaluated by one of the original referees. After reading your revision and the referee report, I consider that the paper still needs some additional minor revisions, as suggested in the annotated manuscript of the referee. Please proceed with these minor revisions . The next revisions will be carefully checked by myself before publication.
Sincerely yours,

Dear Authors,
Thanks for considering the revisions of your manuscript. I consider that these revisions have been correctly addressed and can now be accepted for publication. Thank you for this nice contribution to experimental hydrological sciences.
Regards,