Evaluation of the ERA5 reanalysis as a potential reference dataset for hydrological modelling over North America

Tarek, Mostafa; Brissette, François P.; Arsenault, Richard

doi:https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-2527-2020

Articles | Volume 24, issue 5

https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-2527-2020

© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-2527-2020

© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Articles | Volume 24, issue 5

Research article

|

14 May 2020

Research article |

| 14 May 2020

Evaluation of the ERA5 reanalysis as a potential reference dataset for hydrological modelling over North America

Mostafa Tarek, François P. Brissette, and Richard Arsenault

Download

Final revised paper (published on 14 May 2020)
Preprint (discussion started on 10 Jul 2019)

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment

- Printer-friendly version

- Supplement

RC1: 'Review for hess-2019-316', Anonymous Referee #1, 15 Aug 2019
- AC1: 'Reply to reviewer one', Mostafa Tarek, 11 Mar 2020
- AC3: 'The new manuscript with track changes', Mostafa Tarek, 11 Mar 2020
RC2: 'Review on “Evaluation of the ERA5 reanalysis as a potential reference dataset for hydrological modeling over North-America“ by Tarek et al.', Anonymous Referee #2, 24 Feb 2020
- AC2: 'Reply to reviewer two', Mostafa Tarek, 11 Mar 2020
- AC4: 'The new manuscript with track changes', Mostafa Tarek, 11 Mar 2020

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision

ED: Publish as is (10 Apr 2020) by Luis Samaniego

Short summary

The ERA5 reanalysis dataset is characterized by its high spatial (0.25) and temporal (hourly) resolutions and has therefore a large potential to drive environmental models in regions where the network of stations is deficient. ERA5 performance is evaluated on 3138 North American catchments. Results indicate that for hydrological modelling, ERA5 precipitation and temperature are just as good as observation all over North America, with the exception of the eastern half of the US.