Articles | Volume 23, issue 8
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 3373–3385, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-3373-2019
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 3373–3385, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-3373-2019

Research article 15 Aug 2019

Research article | 15 Aug 2019

Uncertainty quantification of floodplain friction in hydrodynamic models

Guilherme Luiz Dalledonne et al.

Related subject area

Subject: Engineering Hydrology | Techniques and Approaches: Uncertainty analysis
An uncertainty partition approach for inferring interactive hydrologic risks
Yurui Fan, Kai Huang, Guohe Huang, Yongping Li, and Feng Wang
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 4601–4624, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4601-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4601-2020, 2020
Predicting discharge capacity of vegetated compound channels: uncertainty and identifiability of one-dimensional process-based models
Adam Kiczko, Kaisa Västilä, Adam Kozioł, Janusz Kubrak, Elżbieta Kubrak, and Marcin Krukowski
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 4135–4167, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4135-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-4135-2020, 2020
Short summary
Developing a drought-monitoring index for the contiguous US using SMAP
Sara Sadri, Eric F. Wood, and Ming Pan
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 6611–6626, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-6611-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-6611-2018, 2018
Short summary
Technical note: Assessment of observation quality for data assimilation in flood models
Joanne A. Waller, Javier García-Pintado, David C. Mason, Sarah L. Dance, and Nancy K. Nichols
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 3983–3992, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-3983-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-3983-2018, 2018
Sedimentation monitoring including uncertainty analysis in complex floodplains: a case study in the Mekong Delta
N. V. Manh, B. Merz, and H. Apel
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 3039–3057, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-3039-2013,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-3039-2013, 2013

Cited articles

Aberle, J. and Järvelä, J.: Flow resistance of emergent rigid and flexible floodplain vegetation, J. Hydraul. Res., 51, 33–45, 2013. a, b
Aberle, J. and Järvelä, J.: Hydrodynamics of Vegetated Channels, Springer International Publishing, 519–541, 2015. a
Altarejos-García, L., Martínez-Chenoll, M. L., Escuder-Bueno, I., and Serrano-Lombillo, A.: Assessing the impact of uncertainty on flood risk estimates with reliability analysis using 1-D and 2-D hydraulic models, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 1895–1914, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-1895-2012, 2012. a
Antonarakis, A. S., Richards, K. S., Brasington, J., Bithell, M., and Muller, E.: Retrieval of vegetative fluid resistance terms for rigid stems using airborne lidar, J. Geophys. Res., 113, G02S07, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JG000543, 2008. a
Apel, H., Thieken, A. H., Merz, B., and Blöschl, G.: Flood risk assessment and associated uncertainty, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 4, 295–308, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-4-295-2004, 2004. a
Download
Short summary
This study presents how the concept of uncertainty quantification can be applied to river engineering problems and how important it is to understand the limitations of numerical models from a probabilistic point of view. We investigated floodplain friction formulations using different uncertainty quantification methods and estimated their contribution in the final results. The analysis of uncertainties is planned to be integrated in future projects and also extended to more complex scenarios.