Articles | Volume 22, issue 12
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-6371-2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-6371-2018
Research article
 | 
10 Dec 2018
Research article |  | 10 Dec 2018

Caffeine vs. carbamazepine as indicators of wastewater pollution in a karst aquifer

Noam Zach Dvory, Yakov Livshitz, Michael Kuznetsov, Eilon Adar, Guy Gasser, Irena Pankratov, Ovadia Lev, and Alexander Yakirevich

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
ED: Publish subject to revisions (further review by editor and referees) (05 Nov 2018) by Insa Neuweiler
AR by NOAM ZACH DVORY on behalf of the Authors (05 Nov 2018)  Author's response    Manuscript
ED: Publish subject to revisions (further review by editor and referees) (09 Nov 2018) by Insa Neuweiler
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (09 Nov 2018) by Insa Neuweiler
RR by Anonymous Referee #2 (10 Nov 2018)
RR by Anonymous Referee #1 (27 Nov 2018)
ED: Publish subject to technical corrections (27 Nov 2018) by Insa Neuweiler
AR by NOAM ZACH DVORY on behalf of the Authors (29 Nov 2018)  Author's response    Manuscript
Download
Short summary
This research is paramount given the significance of karst aquifers as essential drinking water sources. While CBZ is considered conservative, CAF is subject to sorption and degradation, and therefore each of these two pollutants can be considered effective tracers for specific assessment of aquifer contamination. The model presented in this paper shows how each of the mentioned contaminants could serve as a better tool for aquifer contamination characterization and its treatment.