Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
HESS
Articles | Volume 22, issue 12
Articles | Volume 22, issue 12
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-6257-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-6257-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 22, issue 12
Research article
 | 
06 Dec 2018
Research article |  | 06 Dec 2018

Evaluating post-processing approaches for monthly and seasonal streamflow forecasts

Fitsum Woldemeskel, David McInerney, Julien Lerat, Mark Thyer, Dmitri Kavetski, Daehyok Shin, Narendra Tuteja, and George Kuczera

Viewed

Total article views: 4,459 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
2,990 1,368 101 4,459 119 139
  • HTML: 2,990
  • PDF: 1,368
  • XML: 101
  • Total: 4,459
  • BibTeX: 119
  • EndNote: 139
Views and downloads (calculated since 26 Apr 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 26 Apr 2018)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 4,459 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 4,043 with geography defined and 416 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 06 Dec 2025
Download
Short summary
This paper evaluates several schemes for post-processing monthly and seasonal streamflow forecasts using the Australian Bureau of Meteorology's streamflow forecasting system. Through evaluation across 300 catchments, the best-performing scheme has been identified, which is found to substantially improve important aspects of the forecast quality. This finding is significant because the improved forecasts help water managers and users of the service to make better-informed decisions.
Read more
Share