Articles | Volume 21, issue 11
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 5443–5457, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-5443-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 5443–5457, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-5443-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Research article
06 Nov 2017
Research article
| 06 Nov 2017
Streamflow characteristics from modeled runoff time series – importance of calibration criteria selection
Sandra Pool et al.
Viewed
Total article views: 2,392 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 19 Oct 2016)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,525 | 811 | 56 | 2,392 | 49 | 64 |
- HTML: 1,525
- PDF: 811
- XML: 56
- Total: 2,392
- BibTeX: 49
- EndNote: 64
Total article views: 1,792 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 06 Nov 2017)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,121 | 635 | 36 | 1,792 | 39 | 41 |
- HTML: 1,121
- PDF: 635
- XML: 36
- Total: 1,792
- BibTeX: 39
- EndNote: 41
Total article views: 600 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 19 Oct 2016)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 404 | 176 | 20 | 600 | 10 | 23 |
- HTML: 404
- PDF: 176
- XML: 20
- Total: 600
- BibTeX: 10
- EndNote: 23
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 2,342 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 2,322 with geography defined
and 20 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 1,753 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 1,737 with geography defined
and 16 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 589 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 585 with geography defined
and 4 with unknown origin.
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Cited
25 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Mapping (dis)agreement in hydrologic projections L. Melsen et al. 10.5194/hess-22-1775-2018
- A multi‐objective approach to select hydrological models and constrain structural uncertainties for climate impact assessments D. Saavedra et al. 10.1002/hyp.14446
- Riverine phytoplankton functional groups response to multiple stressors variously depending on hydrological periods Y. Qu et al. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.12.049
- Simulating streamflow in ungauged basins under a changing climate: The importance of landscape characteristics C. Teutschbein et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.03.060
- Calibration of hydrological models for ecologically relevant streamflow predictions: a trade-off between fitting well to data and estimating consistent parameter sets? T. Hallouin et al. 10.5194/hess-24-1031-2020
- Flood spatial coherence, triggers, and performance in hydrological simulations: large-sample evaluation of four streamflow-calibrated models M. Brunner et al. 10.5194/hess-25-105-2021
- Future evolution and uncertainty of river flow regime change in a deglaciating river basin J. Mackay et al. 10.5194/hess-23-1833-2019
- Delineating modelling uncertainty in river flow indicators with representative parameter sets A. Sikorska-Senoner 10.1016/j.advwatres.2021.104024
- Hunting for Information in Streamflow Signatures to Improve Modelled Drainage R. Schneider et al. 10.3390/w14010110
- Predictability of flow metrics calculated using a distributed hydrologic model across ecoregions and stream classes: Implications for developing flow–ecology relationships M. Eddy et al. 10.1002/eco.2387
- Reproducing different types of changes in hydrological indicators with rainfall-runoff models C. Massmann 10.2166/nh.2020.073
- Assessing the impacts of groundwater abstractions on flow regime and stream biota: Combining SWAT-MODFLOW with flow-biota empirical models W. Liu et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135702
- On the selection of precipitation products for the regionalisation of hydrological model parameters O. Baez-Villanueva et al. 10.5194/hess-25-5805-2021
- When is a hydrological model sufficiently calibrated to depict flow preferences of riverine species? J. Kiesel et al. 10.1002/eco.2193
- Future hydrological constraints of the Montseny brook newt ( Calotriton arnoldi ) under changing climate and vegetation cover J. Ledesma et al. 10.1002/ece3.5506
- How to make advances in hydrological modelling K. Beven 10.2166/nh.2019.134
- The accuracy of ecological flow metrics derived using a physics‐based distributed rainfall–runoff model in the Great Plains, USA T. Worthington et al. 10.1002/eco.2090
- Subjective modeling decisions can significantly impact the simulation of flood and drought events L. Melsen et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.11.046
- Replication of ecologically relevant hydrological indicators following a modified covariance approach to hydrological model parameterization A. Visser-Quinn et al. 10.5194/hess-23-3279-2019
- Climate change impacts on ecologically relevant hydrological indicators in three catchments in three European ecoregions J. Kiesel et al. 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2018.12.019
- A novel multi-objective model calibration method for ecohydrological applications J. Hernandez-Suarez et al. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2021.105161
- A review of hydrologic signatures and their applications H. McMillan 10.1002/wat2.1499
- Dependence of flood peaks and volumes in modeled discharge time series: Effect of different uncertainty sources M. Brunner & A. Sikorska-Senoner 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.03.024
- Challenges in modeling and predicting floods and droughts: A review M. Brunner et al. 10.1002/wat2.1520
- Modulation of the goodness of fit in hydrological modelling based on inner balance errors F. Pellicer-Martínez et al. 10.1371/journal.pone.0260117
25 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Mapping (dis)agreement in hydrologic projections L. Melsen et al. 10.5194/hess-22-1775-2018
- A multi‐objective approach to select hydrological models and constrain structural uncertainties for climate impact assessments D. Saavedra et al. 10.1002/hyp.14446
- Riverine phytoplankton functional groups response to multiple stressors variously depending on hydrological periods Y. Qu et al. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.12.049
- Simulating streamflow in ungauged basins under a changing climate: The importance of landscape characteristics C. Teutschbein et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.03.060
- Calibration of hydrological models for ecologically relevant streamflow predictions: a trade-off between fitting well to data and estimating consistent parameter sets? T. Hallouin et al. 10.5194/hess-24-1031-2020
- Flood spatial coherence, triggers, and performance in hydrological simulations: large-sample evaluation of four streamflow-calibrated models M. Brunner et al. 10.5194/hess-25-105-2021
- Future evolution and uncertainty of river flow regime change in a deglaciating river basin J. Mackay et al. 10.5194/hess-23-1833-2019
- Delineating modelling uncertainty in river flow indicators with representative parameter sets A. Sikorska-Senoner 10.1016/j.advwatres.2021.104024
- Hunting for Information in Streamflow Signatures to Improve Modelled Drainage R. Schneider et al. 10.3390/w14010110
- Predictability of flow metrics calculated using a distributed hydrologic model across ecoregions and stream classes: Implications for developing flow–ecology relationships M. Eddy et al. 10.1002/eco.2387
- Reproducing different types of changes in hydrological indicators with rainfall-runoff models C. Massmann 10.2166/nh.2020.073
- Assessing the impacts of groundwater abstractions on flow regime and stream biota: Combining SWAT-MODFLOW with flow-biota empirical models W. Liu et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135702
- On the selection of precipitation products for the regionalisation of hydrological model parameters O. Baez-Villanueva et al. 10.5194/hess-25-5805-2021
- When is a hydrological model sufficiently calibrated to depict flow preferences of riverine species? J. Kiesel et al. 10.1002/eco.2193
- Future hydrological constraints of the Montseny brook newt ( Calotriton arnoldi ) under changing climate and vegetation cover J. Ledesma et al. 10.1002/ece3.5506
- How to make advances in hydrological modelling K. Beven 10.2166/nh.2019.134
- The accuracy of ecological flow metrics derived using a physics‐based distributed rainfall–runoff model in the Great Plains, USA T. Worthington et al. 10.1002/eco.2090
- Subjective modeling decisions can significantly impact the simulation of flood and drought events L. Melsen et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.11.046
- Replication of ecologically relevant hydrological indicators following a modified covariance approach to hydrological model parameterization A. Visser-Quinn et al. 10.5194/hess-23-3279-2019
- Climate change impacts on ecologically relevant hydrological indicators in three catchments in three European ecoregions J. Kiesel et al. 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2018.12.019
- A novel multi-objective model calibration method for ecohydrological applications J. Hernandez-Suarez et al. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2021.105161
- A review of hydrologic signatures and their applications H. McMillan 10.1002/wat2.1499
- Dependence of flood peaks and volumes in modeled discharge time series: Effect of different uncertainty sources M. Brunner & A. Sikorska-Senoner 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.03.024
- Challenges in modeling and predicting floods and droughts: A review M. Brunner et al. 10.1002/wat2.1520
- Modulation of the goodness of fit in hydrological modelling based on inner balance errors F. Pellicer-Martínez et al. 10.1371/journal.pone.0260117
Latest update: 08 Aug 2022
Short summary
This modeling study explores the effect of different model calibration criteria on the accuracy of simulated streamflow characteristics (SFCs). The results imply that one has to consider significant uncertainties when simulated time series are used to derive SFCs that were not included in the calibration. Thus, we strongly recommend calibrating the runoff model explicitly for the SFCs of interest. Our study helps improve the estimation of SFCs for ungauged catchments based on runoff models.
This modeling study explores the effect of different model calibration criteria on the accuracy...
