The WACMOS-ET project &ndash; Part 1: Tower-scale evaluation of four remote-sensing-based evapotranspiration algorithms

Michel, D.; Jiménez, C.; Miralles, D. G.; Jung, M.; Hirschi, M.; Ershadi, A.; Martens, B.; McCabe, M. F.; Fisher, J. B.; Mu, Q.; Seneviratne, S. I.; Wood, E. F.; Fernández-Prieto, D.

doi:https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-803-2016

Articles | Volume 20, issue 2

https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-803-2016

© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-803-2016

© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Articles | Volume 20, issue 2

Research article

|

23 Feb 2016

Research article |

| 23 Feb 2016

The WACMOS-ET project – Part 1: Tower-scale evaluation of four remote-sensing-based evapotranspiration algorithms

D. Michel, C. Jiménez, D. G. Miralles, M. Jung, M. Hirschi, A. Ershadi, B. Martens, M. F. McCabe, J. B. Fisher, Q. Mu, S. I. Seneviratne, E. F. Wood, and D. Fernández-Prieto

Download

Final revised paper (published on 23 Feb 2016)
Preprint (discussion started on 20 Oct 2015)
Companion paper

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment

- Printer-friendly version

- Supplement

RC C4886: 'Very good manuscript, minor revisions.', Paul Dirmeyer, 16 Nov 2015
- AC C6065: 'Author reply', Dominik Michel, 11 Jan 2016
SC C4968: 'FAPAR', Kevin Tu, 20 Nov 2015
- SC C5387: 'Reply to comments about the use of PT-JPL concerning FAPAR/FIPAR', Carlos Jimenez, 04 Dec 2015
  - SC C5473: ''Reply to comments about the use of PT-JPL concerning FAPAR/FIPAR'', Kevin Tu, 07 Dec 2015
    - AC C6069: 'Author reply to SC', Dominik Michel, 11 Jan 2016
RC C5653: 'It is not clear how to parameterise the four models', Anonymous Referee #2, 16 Dec 2015
- AC C6071: 'Author reply', Dominik Michel, 11 Jan 2016
AC C6076: 'Author comments', Dominik Michel, 11 Jan 2016

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision

ED: Publish as is (02 Feb 2016) by Pierre Gentine

Short summary

In this study a common reference input data set from satellite and in situ data is used to run four established evapotranspiration (ET) algorithms using sub-daily and daily input on a tower scale as a testbed for a global ET product. The PT-JPL model and GLEAM provide the best performance for satellite and in situ forcing as well as for the different temporal resolutions. PM-MOD and SEBS perform less well: the PM-MOD model generally underestimates, while SEBS generally overestimates ET.