Articles | Volume 19, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-4377-2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-4377-2015
Research article
 | 
30 Oct 2015
Research article |  | 30 Oct 2015

Towards ecosystem accounting: a comprehensive approach to modelling multiple hydrological ecosystem services

C. Duku, H. Rathjens, S. J. Zwart, and L. Hein

Related subject area

Subject: Catchment hydrology | Techniques and Approaches: Modelling approaches
Comment on “Are soils overrated in hydrology?” by Gao et al. (2023)
Ying Zhao, Mehdi Rahmati, Harry Vereecken, and Dani Or
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4059–4063, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4059-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4059-2024, 2024
Short summary
Multi-decadal fluctuations in root zone storage capacity through vegetation adaptation to hydro-climatic variability have minor effects on the hydrological response in the Neckar River basin, Germany
Siyuan Wang, Markus Hrachowitz, and Gerrit Schoups
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 4011–4033, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4011-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4011-2024, 2024
Short summary
Projected future changes in the cryosphere and hydrology of a mountainous catchment in the upper Heihe River, China
Zehua Chang, Hongkai Gao, Leilei Yong, Kang Wang, Rensheng Chen, Chuntan Han, Otgonbayar Demberel, Batsuren Dorjsuren, Shugui Hou, and Zheng Duan
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 3897–3917, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3897-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3897-2024, 2024
Short summary
On the importance of plant phenology in the evaporative process of a semi-arid woodland: could it be why satellite-based evaporation estimates in the miombo differ?
Henry M. Zimba, Miriam Coenders-Gerrits, Kawawa E. Banda, Petra Hulsman, Nick van de Giesen, Imasiku A. Nyambe, and Hubert H. G. Savenije
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 3633–3663, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3633-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3633-2024, 2024
Short summary
Regionalization of GR4J model parameters for river flow prediction in Paraná, Brazil
Louise Akemi Kuana, Arlan Scortegagna Almeida, Emílio Graciliano Ferreira Mercuri, and Steffen Manfred Noe
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 3367–3390, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3367-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3367-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Abbaspour, K., Yang, J., Reichert, P., Vejdani, M., Haghighat, S., and Srinivasan, R.: SWAT-CUP, SWAT Calibration and Uncertainty Programs, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (EAWAG), Zurich, Switzerland, 2008.
Agnew, L. J., Lyon, S. W., Gerard-Marchant, P., Collins, V. B., Lembo, A. J., Steenhuis, T. S., and Walter, M. T.: Identifying hydrologically sensitive areas: bridging the gap between science and application, J. Environ. Manage., 78, 63–76, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.04.021, 2006.
Allen, R. G., Pereira, S. L., Raes, D., and Smith, M.: Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56, FAO, Rome, Italy, 1998.
AMMA-CATCH Database, available at: http://bd.amma-catch.org/amma-catch2/main.jsf (last access: 28 May 2014), 2014.
Arnold, J. G., Srinivasan, R., Muttiah, R. S., and Williams, J. R.: Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment – Part I: Model development, J. Am. Water Resour. As., 34, 73–89, 1998.
Download
Short summary
Provision of hydrological ecosystem services underlies water and food security and the protection of human lives and properties. We show that the integration of these services into an ecosystem accounting framework provides relevant information on ecosystems and hydrological ecosystem services at appropriate scales suitable for decision-making.