I expect that the Authors can answer most of the comments raised by the two reviewers. They already included a first revised draft, but I strongly recommend the Authors to provide a very accurate revision, in order to properly and completely take into account the reviewers' complaints. Moreover, I attach an annotated copy of their draft revised version, where I inserted several additional comments of mine.
I think that in this work and in related papers, the effect of pore water saturation and conductivity is often neglected or underestimated. This question was raised by both reviewers and it was only partially answered.
Also the topic of SKYTem sensitivity and its relationship with scaling should be clearly addressed.
A careful revision of the reference list is necessary. Several papers are still missing details and some papers are cited in the text but not listed in the bibliography.

Since both reviewers expressed a positive evaluation, I think that the paper can be published. However, one of the reviewers, still raised the point that the language is not always accurate; I hope that the copy-editing service will fix this problem.