the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Integrated Catchment Classification Across China Based on Hydroclimatological and Geomorphological Similarities Using Self-Organizing Maps and Fuzzy C-Means Clustering for Hydrological Modeling
Abstract. Accurately identifying similar catchments is crucial for transferring model parameters and improving hydrological modeling, especially in ungauged regions with varied climates and topographies. This study presents an integrated method for catchment classification by combining Self-Organizing Maps artificial neural network (SOM) and Fuzzy C-Means clustering (FCM), utilizing hydrometeorological and geomorphological data. We evaluated six climate indices and fifteen landscape characteristics for catchments across China, identifying key variables through correlation and principal component analyses. The optimal classification produced six distinct climate regions and 35 catchment types with unique streamflow patterns. Validation using ten catchments confirmed the effectiveness of the SOM-FCM approach. The study underscores the importance of considering both climate and landscape factors for a comprehensive classification of catchments, offering valuable insights for hydrological model predictions in ungauged areas and enhancing our understanding of hydrological processes at various timescales.
- Preprint
(4600 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(857 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (extended)
-
CC1: 'Comment on hess-2024-304', Huan Xu, 08 Feb 2025
reply
I'm interested in catchment classification, so I took a look at this paper. It utilizes SOM and FCM to classify catchments in China based on climate and geomorphic attributes. The paper validates its findings using small watersheds, and the results are quite interesting. However, there are some parts I didn't fully understand, and I have a few suggestions for the author to consider.
Table 3
Why are the attributes in Table 3 selected based on the coefficient of variation?
Figure 2
It is suggested to include an explanation of the d-matrices in the methodology. Consider moving the statement “Vesanto (1999) suggested that SOM results can be expressed in the form of two types…” from L279 to section 2.1.2 and expand on it in more detail.
Figure 3
Consider adjusting the color band so that the color corresponding to 0.5 is set to white. This would better highlight basins belonging to a cluster with higher confidence.
Figure 6
It is recommended to use different color schemes for the third and fourth categories, as their current colors are too similar and not effective.
Figure 7
Consider clearly marking the boundaries of each climate zone in the figure and labeling the basin class in the subplots.
Introduction
The paper overlooks previous catchment classification studies conducted in China:
Luo, K. (1954) Draft of natural geography regionalization of China. (in Chinese)
罗开富,1954. 中国水文区划草案.
Xiong, Y., Zhang, J., et al. (1995) Hydrology Regionalization of China, Science Press, Beijing.(in Chinese)
熊怡,张家桢,等,1995. 中国水文区划. 科学出版社
Liu, C., Zhou, C., et al. (2014) Chinese Hydrological Geography, Science Press, Beijing
刘昌明,周成虎等,2014. 中国水文地理. 科学出版社
Xu, H., Wang, H., Liu, P. (2024). Identifying control factors of hydrological behavior through catchment classification in Mainland of China. Journal of Hydrology, 645, 132206. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.132206
Methodology
In L180, the author claims FCM has “low sensitivity to initialization.” I am curious if this is the case, and it might be beneficial to demonstrate FCM results under multiple initializations.
Methodology
It is suggested that the methods used in the results section be introduced in the methodology, highlighting the logic and approach rather than just detailing the SOM and FCM algorithms. A flowchart would be helpful if possible.
Methodology
How to classify catchment from climate region to basin class? FCM? If so, are the inputs to FCM the features in Table 1 or their principal components?
Results
Were the selected 10 small watersheds affected by human activities, such as agricultural water use or urban consumption? Would this impact the results?
Using 10 small watersheds for validation might be insufficient. If the author is willing, more runoff data can be found in NESSDC (https://www.geodata.cn), such as:
DOI: 10.12041/geodata.30184613892738.ver1.db
DOI: 10.12041/geodata.69811525443157.ver1.db
DOI: 10.12041/geodata.31258482188424.ver1.db
Discussion
The discussion needs to emphasize the connection with the results. Currently, the discussion section seems to introduce existing knowledge within the basin. Perhaps discussing similarities and differences with similar studies, limitations, and potential applications would be more effective.
Discussion
The features used in this paper do not consider any human activities. How might this affect the results of catchment classification? Given the significant human activities in many regions of China, how should we interpret or use the classification results obtained without considering human activities?
L460-471
This part is not easy to understand. Especially, I didn't understand this sentence: L464“The flow regime in climate region II presented multiple peaks following multiple peaks in precipitation in June and July during the same period.”
L495-498
What do “combined indicators” refer to? What does “at different scales” mean? Basin area? Time?
L560-561
What does “There is no particular classification for one catchment that allows greater flexibility in the selection of a catchment for comparative studies or parameter transplantation in ungauged catchments” mean?
L556-557
The statement “Moreover, climate-homogeneous regions respond to hydrological behaviors at medium- or longtime scales, whereas catchment classification regulates hydrological processes at the flood event scale” needs to be strengthened in the results to support this conclusion.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-304-CC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on CC1', Ke Zhang, 16 Feb 2025
reply
Thank you for your comments. We have responded to each of your comments in detail (see attachment) and will make revisions in the manuscript.
If you have further questions, we would be pleased to engage in a more detailed discussion.
-
CC2: 'Reply on AC1', Huan Xu, 16 Feb 2025
reply
Thank you for the detailed reply. I appreciate the clarification.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-304-CC2
-
CC2: 'Reply on AC1', Huan Xu, 16 Feb 2025
reply
-
AC1: 'Reply on CC1', Ke Zhang, 16 Feb 2025
reply
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
151 | 44 | 9 | 204 | 24 | 7 | 9 |
- HTML: 151
- PDF: 44
- XML: 9
- Total: 204
- Supplement: 24
- BibTeX: 7
- EndNote: 9
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1