the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Technical note: comparison of water vapor sampling techniques for stable isotope analysis
Abstract. Water vapor samples are key elements to describe the evaporation process thanks to the stable isotope signatures of δ2H and δ18O. However, its sampling is a difficult task that can introduce errors due to isotopic fractionation. This study investigates the consistency of different sampling techniques for atmospheric water vapor. The isotope signature of a parcel of air was determined with a cavity output spectroscopy device during a period of 3 hours (benchmark). This parcel of air was sampled simultaneously with 3 types of sampling bags made of different materials (metalized polyethylene -MPE-, polyvinyl fluoride -PVF-, low density polyethylene -LDPE-) and with 2 cryogenic baths running at two different pumping rates (3 L min-1 and 50 mL min-1). The tested water vapor sampling techniques differ in their ability to keep reliable measurements after sampling and are highly susceptible to procedural errors. MPE bags are the best option for measuring samples up to two weeks of storage after sampling. LDPE and PVF bags are only reliable if the measurement is performed on the same sampling day.
- Preprint
(690 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
-
RC1: 'Comments on “Technical note: comparison of water vapor sampling techniques for stable isotope analysis” by Jiménez–Rodríguez et al.', Anonymous Referee #1, 26 Aug 2019
- AC1: 'Reply to comments of Referee #1', César Jiménez-Rodríguez, 29 Aug 2019
-
RC2: 'Review', Anonymous Referee #2, 07 Nov 2019
- AC2: 'Reply to comments of Referee #2', César Jiménez-Rodríguez, 12 Nov 2019
-
RC3: 'Comparison of water vapor sampling techniques for stable isotope analysis by César Dionisio Jiménez-Rodríguez and colleagues', Anonymous Referee #3, 20 Nov 2019
- AC5: 'Reply to comments of Referee #3', César Jiménez-Rodríguez, 11 Dec 2019
- AC3: 'Reply to comments of Referee #3', César Jiménez-Rodríguez, 04 Dec 2019
- AC4: 'Reply to comments of Referee #1', César Jiménez-Rodríguez, 04 Dec 2019
-
RC1: 'Comments on “Technical note: comparison of water vapor sampling techniques for stable isotope analysis” by Jiménez–Rodríguez et al.', Anonymous Referee #1, 26 Aug 2019
- AC1: 'Reply to comments of Referee #1', César Jiménez-Rodríguez, 29 Aug 2019
-
RC2: 'Review', Anonymous Referee #2, 07 Nov 2019
- AC2: 'Reply to comments of Referee #2', César Jiménez-Rodríguez, 12 Nov 2019
-
RC3: 'Comparison of water vapor sampling techniques for stable isotope analysis by César Dionisio Jiménez-Rodríguez and colleagues', Anonymous Referee #3, 20 Nov 2019
- AC5: 'Reply to comments of Referee #3', César Jiménez-Rodríguez, 11 Dec 2019
- AC3: 'Reply to comments of Referee #3', César Jiménez-Rodríguez, 04 Dec 2019
- AC4: 'Reply to comments of Referee #1', César Jiménez-Rodríguez, 04 Dec 2019
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2,033 | 468 | 63 | 2,564 | 87 | 77 |
- HTML: 2,033
- PDF: 468
- XML: 63
- Total: 2,564
- BibTeX: 87
- EndNote: 77
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
Cited
2 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Long‐Term Changes in Runoff Generation Mechanisms for Two Proglacial Areas in the Swiss Alps I: Overland Flow F. Maier & I. van Meerveld 10.1029/2021WR030221
- Long‐Term Changes in Runoff Generation Mechanisms for Two Proglacial Areas in the Swiss Alps II: Subsurface Flow F. Maier et al. 10.1029/2021WR030223