Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2017-674
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2017-674
16 Nov 2017
 | 16 Nov 2017
Status: this preprint was under review for the journal HESS but the revision was not accepted.

Minimum dissipation of potential energy by groundwater outflow results in a simple linear catchment reservoir

Axel Kleidon and Hubert H. G. Savenije

Abstract. Streamflow recessions of catchments during periods of no recharge can often be reproduced by a simple, linear reservoir despite the complexity of the catchments. Here we show that such a simple linear behaviour can result from the assumption that groundwater drains from smaller units within the catchment into the stream in such a way that the potential energy of groundwater of the whole catchment is dissipated at the minimum possible rate. To do so, we consider the mass balances of groundwater of two connected sub-catchments that form a hypothetical catchment and consider the depletion of potential energy as groundwater drains into the channel network. We show analytically that the catchment-level depletion of groundwater potential energy has a minimum with respect to a groundwater flux that connects the sub-catchments. The catchment-level minimisation results in equal groundwater levels in the sub-catchments with respect to their channels, which then results in a simple, linear reservoir model for the whole catchment. We then discuss the requirements for such a minimum dissipation state to exist and propose possible mechanisms by which groundwater flow can organise and evolve to such a state. We conclude that the simple, linear response in streamflow recession can be interpreted as the outcome of groundwater flow within the catchment organised to dissipate potential energy at the minimum possible rate. Hence, it would seem that energetic considerations provide an important, additional constraint in the dynamics of water flow networks within catchments that potentially reduces the problem of equifinality in hydrology.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Axel Kleidon and Hubert H. G. Savenije
 
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
 
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
Axel Kleidon and Hubert H. G. Savenije
Axel Kleidon and Hubert H. G. Savenije

Viewed

Total article views: 1,939 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,436 432 71 1,939 101 92
  • HTML: 1,436
  • PDF: 432
  • XML: 71
  • Total: 1,939
  • BibTeX: 101
  • EndNote: 92
Views and downloads (calculated since 16 Nov 2017)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 16 Nov 2017)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,859 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,833 with geography defined and 26 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 20 Nov 2024
Download
Short summary
At larger scales, the flow of rivers can often be described by a relatively simple, exponential decay, and it is unclear how such simple behaviour can be explained given that river basins show such vast complexity. Here, we use a highly idealised model to show that such simple behaviour can be explained by viewing it as the emergent consequence of the groundwater system (which feeds river flow) minimising its energy dissipation.