Articles | Volume 30, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-965-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-965-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Quantifying evaporation of intercepted rainfall: a hybrid correction approach for eddy-covariance measurements
Stefanie Fischer
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Technische Universität Dresden, Institute of Hydrology and Meteorology, Department of Meteorology, Pienner Str. 23, 01737 Tharandt, Germany
Ronald Queck
Technische Universität Dresden, Institute of Hydrology and Meteorology, Department of Meteorology, Pienner Str. 23, 01737 Tharandt, Germany
Christian Bernhofer
Technische Universität Dresden, Institute of Hydrology and Meteorology, Department of Meteorology, Pienner Str. 23, 01737 Tharandt, Germany
Matthias Mauder
Technische Universität Dresden, Institute of Hydrology and Meteorology, Department of Meteorology, Pienner Str. 23, 01737 Tharandt, Germany
Related authors
No articles found.
Ann-Kristin Kunz, Samuel Hammer, Patrick Aigner, Laura Bignotti, Lars Borchardt, Jia Chen, Julian Della Coletta, Lukas Emmenegger, Markus Eritt, Xochilt Gutiérrez, Josh Hashemi, Rainer Hilland, Christopher Holst, Armin Jordan, Natascha Kljun, Richard Kneißl, Changxing Lan, Virgile Legendre, Ingeborg Levin, Benjamin Loubet, Matthias Mauder, Betty Molinier, Susanne Preunkert, Michel Ramonet, Stavros Stagakis, and Andreas Christen
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4856, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4856, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We present radiocarbon (14C)-based fossil fuel CO2 fluxes from relaxed eddy accumulation measurements on tall towers in the cities of Zurich, Paris, and Munich. By separating net CO2 fluxes into fossil and non-fossil components, these data reveal significant and variable contributions from human, plant, and soil respiration, as well as point-source emissions. These unique insights into CO2 flux composition offer crucial information for observation-based validation of urban emission estimates.
Johannes Speidel, Hannes Vogelmann, Andreas Behrendt, Diego Lange, Matthias Mauder, Jens Reichardt, and Kevin Wolz
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 4923–4948, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-4923-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-4923-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Humidity transport from the Earth's surface into the atmosphere is relevant for many processes. However, knowledge of the actual distribution of humidity concentrations is sparse – mainly due to technological limitations. With the lidar presented herein, it is possible to measure humidity concentrations and their vertical fluxes up to altitudes of > 3 km with high spatiotemporal resolution, opening new possibilities for detailed process understanding and, ultimately, better model representation.
Rico Kronenberg, Ivan Vorobevskii, Thi Thanh Luong, Uwe Spank, Dongkyun Kim, and Matthias Mauder
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2084, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2084, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We developed an improved model to better understand how water and energy move through natural landscapes (forest, grasslands, croplands, etc) throughout the day. By using detailed data from study-site in Germany, we tested the model and found its good agreement with micro-meteorological measurements. Unlike many other tools, this model works without needing new adjustments and offers a powerful way to study fast-changing water processes in different environments.
Kevin Wolz, Christopher Holst, Frank Beyrich, Eileen Päschke, and Matthias Mauder
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 13, 205–223, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-205-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-13-205-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We compared wind measurements using different lidar setups at various heights. The triple Doppler lidar, sonic anemometer, and two single Doppler lidars were tested. Overall, the lidar methods showed good agreement with the sonic anemometer. The triple Doppler lidar performed better than single Doppler lidars, especially at higher altitudes. We also developed a new filtering approach for virtual tower scanning strategies. Single Doppler lidars provide reliable wind data over flat terrain.
Changxing Lan, Matthias Mauder, Stavros Stagakis, Benjamin Loubet, Claudio D'Onofrio, Stefan Metzger, David Durden, and Pedro-Henrique Herig-Coimbra
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 2649–2669, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2649-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2649-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Using eddy-covariance systems deployed in three cities, we aimed to elucidate the sources of discrepancies in flux estimations from different software packages. One crucial finding is the impact of low-frequency spectral loss corrections on tall-tower flux estimations. Our findings emphasize the significance of a standardized measurement setup and consistent postprocessing configurations in minimizing the systematic flux uncertainty resulting from the usage of different software packages.
Sinikka J. Paulus, Rene Orth, Sung-Ching Lee, Anke Hildebrandt, Martin Jung, Jacob A. Nelson, Tarek Sebastian El-Madany, Arnaud Carrara, Gerardo Moreno, Matthias Mauder, Jannis Groh, Alexander Graf, Markus Reichstein, and Mirco Migliavacca
Biogeosciences, 21, 2051–2085, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-2051-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-2051-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Porous materials are known to reversibly trap water from the air, even at low humidity. However, this behavior is poorly understood for soils. In this analysis, we test whether eddy covariance is able to measure the so-called adsorption of atmospheric water vapor by soils. We find that this flux occurs frequently during dry nights in a Mediterranean ecosystem, while EC detects downwardly directed vapor fluxes. These results can help to map moisture uptake globally.
Sreenath Paleri, Luise Wanner, Matthias Sühring, Ankur Desai, and Matthias Mauder
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1721, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1721, 2023
Preprint archived
Short summary
Short summary
We present a description and evaluation of numerical simulations of field experiment days during the CHEESEHEAD19 field campaign, conducted over a heterogeneous forested domain in Northern Wisconsin, USA. Diurnal simulations, informed and constrained by field measurements for two days during the summer and autumn were performed. The model could simulate near surface time series and profiles of atmospheric state variables and fluxes that matched relatively well with observations.
Dánnell Quesada-Chacón, Klemens Barfus, and Christian Bernhofer
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 7353–7370, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7353-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7353-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We improved the performance of past perfect prognosis statistical downscaling methods while achieving full model repeatability with GPU-calculated deep learning models using the TensorFlow, climate4R, and VALUE frameworks. We employed the ERA5 reanalysis as predictors and ReKIS (eastern Ore Mountains, Germany, 1 km resolution) as precipitation predictand, while incorporating modern deep learning architectures. The achieved repeatability is key to accomplish further milestones with deep learning.
Ivan Vorobevskii, Thi Thanh Luong, Rico Kronenberg, Thomas Grünwald, and Christian Bernhofer
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 3177–3239, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3177-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3177-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
In the study we analysed the uncertainties of the meteorological data and model parameterization for evaporation modelling. We have taken a physically based lumped BROOK90 model and applied it in three different frameworks using global, regional and local datasets. Validating the simulations with eddy-covariance data from five stations in Germany, we found that the accuracy model parameterization plays a bigger role than the quality of the meteorological forcing.
Matthias Mauder, Andreas Ibrom, Luise Wanner, Frederik De Roo, Peter Brugger, Ralf Kiese, and Kim Pilegaard
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 7835–7850, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-7835-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-7835-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Turbulent flux measurements suffer from a general systematic underestimation. One reason for this bias is non-local transport by large-scale circulations. A recently developed model for this additional transport of sensible and latent energy is evaluated for three different test sites. Different options on how to apply this correction are presented, and the results are evaluated against independent measurements.
Stefan Metzger, David Durden, Sreenath Paleri, Matthias Sühring, Brian J. Butterworth, Christopher Florian, Matthias Mauder, David M. Plummer, Luise Wanner, Ke Xu, and Ankur R. Desai
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 6929–6954, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-6929-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-6929-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The key points are the following. (i) Integrative observing system design can multiply the information gain of surface–atmosphere field measurements. (ii) Catalyzing numerical simulations and first-principles machine learning open up observing system simulation experiments to novel applications. (iii) Use cases include natural climate solutions, emission inventory validation, urban air quality, and industry leak detection.
Judith Marie Pöschmann, Dongkyun Kim, Rico Kronenberg, and Christian Bernhofer
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 1195–1207, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-1195-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-1195-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We examined maximum rainfall values for different durations from 16 years of radar-based rainfall records for whole Germany. Unlike existing observations based on rain gauge data no clear linear relationship could be identified. However, by classifying all time series, we could identify three similar groups determined by the temporal structure of rainfall extremes observed in the study period. The study highlights the importance of using long data records and a dense measurement network.
Cited articles
Baldocchi, D., Falge, E., Gu, L., Olson, R., Hollinger, D., Running, S., Anthoni, P., Bernhofer, C., Davis, K., Evans, R., Fuentes, J., Goldstein, A., Katul, G., Law, B., Lee, X., Malhi, Y., Meyers, T., Munger, W., Oechel, W., Paw, K. T., Pilegaard, K., Schmid, H. P., Valentini, R., Verma, S., Vesala, T., Wilson, K., and Wofsy, S.: FLUXNET: A New Tool to Study the Temporal and Spatial Variability of Ecosystem – Scale Carbon Dioxide, Water Vapor, and Energy Flux Densities, Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 82, 2415–2434, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(2001)082<2415:FANTTS>2.3.CO;2, 2001. a
Bambach, N., Kustas, W., Alfieri, J., Prueger, J., Hipps, L., McKee, L., Castro, S. J., Volk, J., Alsina, M. M., and McElrone, A. J.: Evapotranspiration uncertainty at micrometeorological scales: the impact of the eddy covariance energy imbalance and correction methods, Irrig. Sci., 40, 445–461, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-022-00783-1, 2022. a, b, c, d, e
Bernhofer, C., Grünwald, T., Moderow, U., Hehn, M., Eichelmann, U., Prasse, H., Postel, U.: FLUXNET2015 DE-Tha Tharandt, FLUXNET [data set], https://doi.org/10.18140/FLX/1440152, 1996–2014. a
Bernhofer, C., Eichelmann, U., Gruenwald, T., Hehn, M., and Moderow, U.: Fluxnet Archive Product from Tharandt, 1996–2020, Ecosystem Thematic Centre [data set], https://hdl.handle.net/11676/VH-emhqZkrnp0dnhLKdnahl1 (last access: 28 November 2024), 2024. a
Chu, H., Luo, X., Ouyang, Z., Chan, W. S., Dengel, S., Biraud, S. C., Torn, M. S., Metzger, S., Kumar, J., Arain, M. A., Arkebauer, T. J., Baldocchi, D., Bernacchi, C., Billesbach, D., Black, T. A., Blanken, P. D., Bohrer, G., Bracho, R., Brown, S., Brunsell, N. A., Chen, J., Chen, X., Clark, K., Desai, A. R., Duman, T., Durden, D., Fares, S., Forbrich, I., Gamon, J. A., Gough, C. M., Griffis, T., Helbig, M., Hollinger, D., Humphreys, E., Ikawa, H., Iwata, H., Ju, Y., Knowles, J. F., Knox, S. H., Kobayashi, H., Kolb, T., Law, B., Lee, X., Litvak, M., Liu, H., Munger, J. W., Noormets, A., Novick, K., Oberbauer, S. F., Oechel, W., Oikawa, P., Papuga, S. A., Pendall, E., Prajapati, P., Prueger, J., Quinton, W. L., Richardson, A. D., Russell, E. S., Scott, R. L., Starr, G., Staebler, R., Stoy, P. C., Stuart-Haëntjens, E., Sonnentag, O., Sullivan, R. C., Suyker, A., Ueyama, M., Vargas, R., Wood, J. D., and Zona, D.: Representativeness of Eddy-Covariance flux footprints for areas surrounding AmeriFlux sites, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 301–302, 108350, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2021.108350, 2021. a
Cisneros Vaca, C., van der Tol, C., and Ghimire, C. P.: The influence of long-term changes in canopy structure on rainfall interception loss: a case study in Speulderbos, the Netherlands, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 3701–3719, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-3701-2018, 2018. a
Dingman, L.: Physical Hydrology, Waveland Press, Inc., 3rd Edn., ISBN 978-1-4786-1118-9, 2015. a
Falge, E., Reth, S., Brüggemann, N., Butterbach-Bahl, K., Goldberg, V., Oltchev, A., Schaaf, S., Spindler, G., Stiller, B., Queck, R., Köstner, B., and Bernhofer, C.: Comparison of surface energy exchange models with eddy flux data in forest and grassland ecosystems of Germany, Ecological Modelling, 188, 174–216, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.01.057, 2005. a
Federer, C. A.: BROOK 90: A simulation model for evaporation, soil water, and streamflow, http://www.ecoshift.net/brook/brook90.htm (last access: 14 February 2025), 2002. a
Fischer, S., Moderow, U., Queck, R., and Bernhofer, C.: Evaporation of intercepted rainfall – Comparing canopy water budget and energy balance related long term measurements at a Norway spruce site, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 341, 109637, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2023.109637, 2023. a, b, c, d, e, f
Foken, T., Gockede, M., Mauder, M., Mahrt, L., Amiro, B., and Munger, W.: Post-field data quality control, Handbook of micrometeorology: a guidefor surface flux measurement and analysis, p. 28, https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2265-4_9, 2005. a
Fratini, G., Ibrom, A., Arriga, N., Burba, G., and Papale, D.: Relative humidity effects on water vapour fluxes measured with closed-path eddy-covariance systems with short sampling lines, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 165, 53–63, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.05.018, 2012. a, b
Gerrits, A. M. J., Pfister, L., and Savenije, H. H. G.: Spatial and temporal variability of canopy and forest floor interception in a beech forest, Hydrol. Process., 24, 3011–3025, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7712, 2010. a
Grunicke, S., Queck, R., and Bernhofer, C.: Long-term investigation of forest canopy rainfall interception for a spruce stand, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 292–293, 108125, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.108125, 2020. a, b, c, d
Grünwald, T. and Bernhofer, C.: A decade of carbon, water and energy flux measurements of an old spruce forest at the Anchor Station Tharandt, Tellus B: Chemical and Physical Meteorology, 59, 387–396, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2007.00259.x, 2007. a
IPCC: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896, 2021. a
Jarvis, P. G., Monteith, J. L., and Weatherley, P. E.: The interpretation of the variations in leaf water potential and stomatal conductance found in canopies in the field, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences, 273, 593–610, https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1976.0035, 1976. a
Jensen, N. O. and Hummelshøj, P.: Derivation of canopy resistance for water vapour fluxes over a spruce forest, using a new technique for the viscous sublayer resistance, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 73, 339–352, https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1923(94)05083-I, 1995. a
Kljun, N., Calanca, P., Rotach, M. W., and Schmid, H. P.: A simple two-dimensional parameterisation for Flux Footprint Prediction (FFP), Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 3695–3713, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-3695-2015, 2015. a
Lian, X., Zhao, W., and Gentine, P.: Recent global decline in rainfall interception loss due to altered rainfall regimes, Nat. Commun., 13, 7642, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-35414-y, 2022. a, b, c
Massman, W. J. and Ibrom, A.: Attenuation of concentration fluctuations of water vapor and other trace gases in turbulent tube flow, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 6245–6259, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-6245-2008, 2008. a
Mauder, M., Genzel, S., Fu, J., Kiese, R., Soltani, M., Steinbrecher, R., Zeeman, M., Banerjee, T., De Roo, F., and Kunstmann, H.: Evaluation of energy balance closure adjustment methods by independent evapotranspiration estimates from lysimeters and hydrological simulations, Hydrological Processes, 32, 39–50, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.11397, 2018. a
Mauder, M., Ibrom, A., Wanner, L., De Roo, F., Brugger, P., Kiese, R., and Pilegaard, K.: Options to correct local turbulent flux measurements for large-scale fluxes using an approach based on large-eddy simulation, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 7835–7850, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-7835-2021, 2021. a, b
Mauder, M., Jung, M., Stoy, P., Nelson, J., and Wanner, L.: Energy balance closure at FLUXNET sites revisited, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 358, 110235, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2024.110235, 2024. a, b
Miralles, D. G., Brutsaert, W., Dolman, A. J., and Gash, J. H.: On the Use of the Term “Evapotranspiration”, Water Resources Research, 56, e2020WR028055, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR028055, 2020. a
Pluntke, T., Bernhofer, C., Grünwald, T., Renner, M., and Prasse, H.: Long-term climatological and ecohydrological analysis of a paired catchment – flux tower observatory near Dresden (Germany). Is there evidence of climate change in local evapotranspiration?, Journal of Hydrology, 617, 128873, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128873, 2023. a, b, c, d
Queck, R., Bienert, A., Maas, H.-G., Harmansa, S., Goldberg, V., and Bernhofer, C.: Wind fields in heterogeneous conifer canopies: parameterisation of momentum absorption using high-resolution 3D vegetation scans, Eur. J. Forest Res., 131, 165–176, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-011-0550-0, 2012. a
Queck, R., Bernhofer, C., Bienert, A., and Schlegel, F.: The TurbEFA Field Experiment – Measuring the Influence of a Forest Clearing on the Turbulent Wind Field, Boundary-Layer Meteorol., 160, 397–423, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-016-0151-z, 2016. a, b
Ringgaard, R., Herbst, M., and Friborg, T.: Partitioning forest evapotranspiration: Interception evaporation and the impact of canopy structure, local and regional advection, Journal of Hydrology, 517, 677–690, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.06.007, 2014. a
Rutter, A. J., Morton, A. J., and Robins, P. C.: A Predictive Model of Rainfall Interception in Forests. II. Generalization of the Model and Comparison with Observations in Some Coniferous and Hardwood Stands, The Journal of Applied Ecology, 12, 367, https://doi.org/10.2307/2401739, 1975. a, b
Sabbatini, S., Mammarella, I., Arriga, N., Fratini, G., Graf, A., Hörtnagl, L., Ibrom, A., Longdoz, B., Mauder, M., Merbold, L., Metzger, S., Montagnani, L., Pitacco, A., Rebmann, C., Sedlák, P., Šigut, L., Vitale, D., and Papale, D.: Eddy covariance raw data processing for CO2 and energy fluxes calculation at ICOS ecosystem stations, International Agrophysics, 32, 495–515, https://doi.org/10.1515/intag-2017-0043, 2018. a, b
Savenije, H. H. G.: The importance of interception and why we should delete the term evapotranspiration from our vocabulary, Hydrological Processes, 18, 1507–1511, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5563, 2004. a
Schmid, H. P.: Experimental design for flux measurements: matching scales of observations and fluxes, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 87, 179–200, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1923(97)00011-7, 1997. a
Stewart, J.: Modelling surface conductance of pine forest, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 43, 19–35, https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1923(88)90003-2, 1988. a, b, c
Stewart, J. B.: Evaporation from the wet canopy of a pine forest, Water Resour. Res., 13, 915–921, https://doi.org/10.1029/WR013i006p00915, 1977. a
Stoy, P. C., El-Madany, T. S., Fisher, J. B., Gentine, P., Gerken, T., Good, S. P., Klosterhalfen, A., Liu, S., Miralles, D. G., Perez-Priego, O., Rigden, A. J., Skaggs, T. H., Wohlfahrt, G., Anderson, R. G., Coenders-Gerrits, A. M. J., Jung, M., Maes, W. H., Mammarella, I., Mauder, M., Migliavacca, M., Nelson, J. A., Poyatos, R., Reichstein, M., Scott, R. L., and Wolf, S.: Reviews and syntheses: Turning the challenges of partitioning ecosystem evaporation and transpiration into opportunities, Biogeosciences, 16, 3747–3775, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-3747-2019, 2019. a
Teklehaimanot, Z. and Jarvis, P. G.: Direct Measurement of Evaporation of Intercepted Water from Forest Canopies, The Journal of Applied Ecology, 28, 603, https://doi.org/10.2307/2404571, 1991. a
van Dijk, A. I., Gash, J. H., van Gorsel, E., Blanken, P. D., Cescatti, A., Emmel, C., Gielen, B., Harman, I. N., Kiely, G., Merbold, L., Montagnani, L., Moors, E., Sottocornola, M., Varlagin, A., Williams, C. A., and Wohlfahrt, G.: Rainfall interception and the coupled surface water and energy balance, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 214-215, 402–415, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2015.09.006, 2015. a, b, c
Van Stan, Ii, J. T., Gutmann, E., and Friesen, J. (Eds.): Precipitation Partitioning by Vegetation: A Global Synthesis, Springer International Publishing, Cham, ISBN 978-3-030-29701-5, ISBN 978-3-030-29702-2, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29702-2, 2020. a, b
Vickers, D. and Mahrt, L.: Quality Control and Flux Sampling Problems for Tower and Aircraft Data, Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 14, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1997)014<0512:QCAFSP>2.0.CO;2, 1997. a
Vorobevskii, I., Luong, T. T., Kronenberg, R., Grünwald, T., and Bernhofer, C.: Modelling evaporation with local, regional and global BROOK90 frameworks: importance of parameterization and forcing, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 3177–3239, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3177-2022, 2022. a, b, c
Wanner, L., Jung, M., Paleri, S., Butterworth, B. J., Desai, A. R., Sühring, M., and Mauder, M.: Towards Energy-Balance Closure with a Model of Dispersive Heat Fluxes, Boundary-Layer Meteorol, 190, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-024-00868-8, 2024. a, b, c
Wutzler, T., Lucas-Moffat, A., Migliavacca, M., Knauer, J., Sickel, K., Šigut, L., Menzer, O., and Reichstein, M.: Basic and extensible post-processing of eddy covariance flux data with REddyProc, Biogeosciences, 15, 5015–5030, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-5015-2018, 2018. a
Yi, K., Senay, G. B., Fisher, J. B., Wang, L., Suvočarev, K., Chu, H., Moore, G. W., Novick, K. A., Barnes, M. L., Keenan, T. F., Mallick, K., Luo, X., Missik, J. E. C., Delwiche, K. B., Nelson, J. A., Good, S. P., Xiao, X., Kannenberg, S. A., Ahmadi, A., Wang, T., Bohrer, G., Litvak, M. E., Reed, D. E., Oishi, A. C., Torn, M. S., and Baldocchi, D.: Challenges and Future Directions in Quantifying Terrestrial Evapotranspiration, Water Resources Research, 60, e2024WR037622, https://doi.org/10.1029/2024WR037622, 2024. a
Zhang, W., Jung, M., Migliavacca, M., Poyatos, R., Miralles, D. G., El-Madany, T. S., Galvagno, M., Carrara, A., Arriga, N., Ibrom, A., Mammarella, I., Papale, D., Cleverly, J. R., Liddell, M., Wohlfahrt, G., Markwitz, C., Mauder, M., Paul-Limoges, E., Schmidt, M., Wolf, S., Brümmer, C., Arain, M. A., Fares, S., Kato, T., Ardö, J., Oechel, W., Hanson, C., Korkiakoski, M., Biraud, S., Steinbrecher, R., Billesbach, D., Montagnani, L., Woodgate, W., Shao, C., Carvalhais, N., Reichstein, M., and Nelson, J. A.: The effect of relative humidity on eddy covariance latent heat flux measurements and its implication for partitioning into transpiration and evaporation, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 330, 109305, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2022.109305, 2023. a, b, c, d, e, f
Zhang, W., Nelson, J. A., Miralles, D. G., Mauder, M., Migliavacca, M., Poyatos, R., Reichstein, M., and Jung, M.: A New Post‐Hoc Method to Reduce the Energy Imbalance in Eddy Covariance Measurements, Geophysical Research Letters, 51, e2023GL107084, https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL107084, 2024. a
Zimmermann, A. and Zimmermann, B.: Requirements for throughfall monitoring: The roles of temporal scale and canopy complexity, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 189–190, 125–139, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2014.01.014, 2014. a
Short summary
Accurate estimates of interception are important to assess the water availability in ecosystems. We analyzed rainfall interception for a forest site from plot to stand scale. During interception, eddy-covariance measurements of evaporation were systematically underestimated accounting for 24 % of precipitation, while modelled interception evaporation accounted for 45 %. As a consequence, we developed a hybrid correction approach to fit the evaporation data to both the energy and the water balance.
Accurate estimates of interception are important to assess the water availability in ecosystems....