Articles | Volume 30, issue 15
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-4867-2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-4867-2026
Research article
 | 
04 Aug 2026
Research article |  | 04 Aug 2026

Metrics that matter: objective functions and their impact on signature representation in conceptual hydrological models

Peter Wagener, Wouter J. M. Knoben, Niels Schütze, and Diana Spieler

Data sets

Calibration and Evaluation Data for Objective Function Impact on Hydrologic Signatures Peter Wagener https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21399824

Model code and software

Code for Analysis and Visualization Peter Wagener https://github.com/peterwagener/OF_Signature_Code.git

Download
Short summary

Hydrologic models help predict floods and droughts, but how we calibrate them changes what they get right. Across 47 model structures and 10 diverse catchments, we tested how 8 metrics shape the reproduction of 15 streamflow features, from runoff ratios to high and low flows. Metric choice often mattered more than model structure, yet no single metric is best for all flow conditions. We provide guidance on metric strengths and weaknesses to help match the calibration metric to the study purpose.

 

Share