Boucher, M.-A., Quilty, J., and Adamowski, J.: Data Assimilation for Streamflow Forecasting Using Extreme Learning Machines and Multilayer Perceptrons, Water Resour. Res., 56, e2019WR026226,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR026226, 2020.
a
Bourgin, F., Ramos, M. H., Thirel, G., and Andréassian, V.: Investigating the interactions between data assimilation and post-processing in hydrological ensemble forecasting, J. Hydrol., 519, 2775–2784,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.07.054, 2014.
a
Bradley, A. A. and Schwartz, S. S.: Summary Verification Measures and Their Interpretation for Ensemble Forecasts, Mon. Weather Rev., 139, 3075–3089,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2010MWR3305.1, 2011.
a,
b
Buizza, R., Houtekamer, P. L., Pellerin, G., Toth, Z., Zhu, Y., and Wei, M.: A Comparison of the ECMWF, MSC, and NCEP Global Ensemble Prediction Systems, Mon. Weather Rev., 133, 1076–1097,
https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR2905.1, 2005.
a
Clark, M. P., Rupp, D. E., Woods, R. A., Zheng, X., Ibbitt, R. P., Slater, A. G., Schmidt, J., and Uddstrom, M. J.: Hydrological data assimilation with the ensemble Kalman filter: Use of streamflow observations to update states in a distributed hydrological model, Adv. Water Resour., 31, 1309–1324,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2008.06.005, 2008.
a,
b
Crochemore, L., Ramos, M.-H., Pappenberger, F., and Perrin, C.: Seasonal streamflow forecasting by conditioning climatology with precipitation indices, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 1573–1591,
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-1573-2017, 2017.
a
Delaigue, O., Guimarães, G. M., Brigode, P., Génot, B., Perrin, C., Soubeyroux, J.-M., Janet, B., Addor, N., and Andréassian, V.: CAMELS-FR dataset: a large-sample hydroclimatic dataset for France to explore hydrological diversity and support model benchmarking, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 1461–1479,
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-1461-2025, 2025.
a,
b,
c,
d
Fang, Z., Wang, Y., Peng, L., and Hong, H.: Predicting flood susceptibility using LSTM neural networks, J. Hydrol., 594, 125734,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125734, 2021.
a
Feng, D., Fang, K., and Shen, C.: Enhancing Streamflow Forecast and Extracting Insights Using Long-Short Term Memory Networks With Data Integration at Continental Scales, Water Resour. Res., 56, e2019WR026793,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR026793, 2020.
a,
b
Gupta, H. V., Kling, H., Yilmaz, K. K., and Martinez, G. F.: Decomposition of the mean squared error and NSE performance criteria: Implications for improving hydrological modelling, J. Hydrol., 377, 80–91,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.08.003, 2009.
a
Harold, B., Barb, B., Beth, E., Chris, F., Johannes, J., Ian, J., Tieh-Yong, K., Paul, R., and David, S.: WWRP/WGNE Joint Working Group on Forecast Verification Research,
https://www.cawcr.gov.au/projects/verification/ (last access: 13 December 2024), 2015. a
Hashemi, R., Brigode, P., Garambois, P.-A., and Javelle, P.: How can we benefit from regime information to make more effective use of long short-term memory (LSTM) runoff models?, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5793–5816,
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5793-2022, 2022.
a,
b,
c
Hidalgo, J. and Jougla, R.: On the use of local weather types classification to improve climate understanding: An application on the urban climate of Toulouse, PLOS ONE, 13, e0208138,
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208138, 2018.
a,
b
Hudson, D., Alves, O., Hendon, H. H., Lim, E.-P., Liu, G., Luo, J.-J., MacLachlan, C., Marshall, A. G., Shi, L., Wang, G., Wedd, R., Young, G., Zhao, M., and Zhou, X.: Corrigendum to: ACCESS-S1: The new Bureau of Meteorology multi-week to seasonal prediction system, J. South. Hemis. Earth Syst. Sci., 70, 393,
https://doi.org/10.1071/ES17009_CO, 2020.
a
Husic, A., Al-Aamery, N., and Fox, J. F.: Simulating hydrologic pathway contributions in fluvial and karst settings: An evaluation of conceptual, physically-based, and deep learning modeling approaches, J. Hydrol. X, 17, 100134,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydroa.2022.100134, 2022.
a
Jeannin, P.-Y., Artigue, G., Butscher, C., Chang, Y., Charlier, J.-B., Duran, L., Gill, L., Hartmann, A., Johannet, A., Jourde, H., Kavousi, A., Liesch, T., Liu, Y., Lüthi, M., Malard, A., Mazzilli, N., Pardo-Igúzquiza, E., Thiéry, D., Reimann, T., Schuler, P., Wöhling, T., and Wunsch, A.: Karst modelling challenge 1: Results of hydrological modelling, J. Hydrol., 600, 126508,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126508, 2021.
a,
b
JetBrains: PyCharm,
https://www.jetbrains.com/pycharm/ (last access: 20 March 2026), 2024. a
Kitanidis, P. K. and Bras, R. L.: Real-time forecasting with a conceptual hydrologic model: 2. Applications and results, Water Resour. Res., 16, 1034–1044,
https://doi.org/10.1029/WR016i006p01034, 1980.
a,
b
Kluyver, T., Ragan-Kelley, B., Pérez, F., Granger, B., Bussonnier, M., Frederic, J., Kelley, K., Hamrick, J., Grout, J., Corlay, S., Ivanov, P., Avila, D., Abdalla, S., and Willing, C.: Jupyter Notebooks – a publishing format for reproducible computational workflows, in: Positioning and Power in Academic Publishing: Players, Agents and Agendas, IOS Press, 87–90,
https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-649-1-87, 2016.
a
Kratzert, F., Klotz, D., Brenner, C., Schulz, K., and Herrnegger, M.: Rainfall–runoff modelling using Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 6005–6022,
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-6005-2018, 2018.
a,
b
Kratzert, F., Klotz, D., Shalev, G., Klambauer, G., Hochreiter, S., and Nearing, G.: Towards learning universal, regional, and local hydrological behaviors via machine learning applied to large-sample datasets, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 5089–5110,
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-5089-2019, 2019.
a,
b,
c,
d,
e,
f,
g,
h,
i,
j,
k,
l,
m,
n
Li, H., Zhang, C., Chu, W., Shen, D., and Li, R.: A process-driven deep learning hydrological model for daily rainfall-runoff simulation, J. Hydrol., 637, 131434,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.131434, 2024.
a
McKinney, W.: Data Structures for Statistical Computing in Python, in: Proceedings of the 9th Python in Science Conference, edited by: v. D. W. Stefan and Jarrod, M., Austin, Texas, USA, 56–61,
https://doi.org/10.25080/Majora-92bf1922-00a, 2010.
a
Nearing, G. S., Klotz, D., Frame, J. M., Gauch, M., Gilon, O., Kratzert, F., Sampson, A. K., Shalev, G., and Nevo, S.: Technical note: Data assimilation and autoregression for using near-real-time streamflow observations in long short-term memory networks, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5493–5513,
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5493-2022, 2022.
a,
b,
c,
d,
e,
f,
g,
h
Newman, A. J., Mizukami, N., Clark, M. P., Wood, A. W., Nijssen, B., and Nearing, G.: Benchmarking of a Physically Based Hydrologic Model, J. Hydrometeorol, 18, 2215–2225,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-16-0284.1, 2017.
a,
b,
c,
d
Oliveira, D. D., Rampinelli, M., Tozatto, G. Z., Andreão, R. V., and Müller, S. M. T.: Forecasting vehicular traffic flow using MLP and LSTM, Neural Comput. Appl., 33, 17245–17256,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-021-06315-w, 2021.
a
Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., Blondel, M., Prettenhofer, P., Weiss, R., Dubourg, V., VanderPlas, J., Passos, A., Cournapeau, D., Brucher, M., Perrot, M., and Duchesnay, E.: Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python, CoRR, abs/1201.0490, arXiv [preprint],
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1201.0490, 2012.
a
Pelletier, A. and Andréassian, V.: An underground view of surface hydrology: what can piezometers tell us about river floods and droughts?, Comptes Rendus. Géoscience, 355, 271–280,
https://doi.org/10.5802/crgeos.195, 2024.
a
Perrin, C., Michel, C., and Andréassian, V.: Improvement of a parsimonious model for streamflow simulation, J. Hydrol., 279, 275–289,
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(03)00225-7, 2003.
a,
b
Petropoulos, F., Apiletti, D., Assimakopoulos, V., Babai, M. Z., Barrow, D. K., Ben Taieb, S., Bergmeir, C., Bessa, R. J., Bijak, J., Boylan, J. E., Browell, J., Carnevale, C., Castle, J. L., Cirillo, P., Clements, M. P., Cordeiro, C., Cyrino Oliveira, F. L., De Baets, S., Dokumentov, A., Ellison, J., Fiszeder, P., Franses, P. H., Frazier, D. T., Gilliland, M., Gönül, M. S., Goodwin, P., Grossi, L., Grushka-Cockayne, Y., Guidolin, M., Guidolin, M., Gunter, U., Guo, X., Guseo, R., Harvey, N., Hendry, D. F., Hollyman, R., Januschowski, T., Jeon, J., Jose, V. R. R., Kang, Y., Koehler, A. B., Kolassa, S., Kourentzes, N., Leva, S., Li, F., Litsiou, K., Makridakis, S., Martin, G. M., Martinez, A. B., Meeran, S., Modis, T., Nikolopoulos, K., Önkal, D., Paccagnini, A., Panagiotelis, A., Panapakidis, I., Pavía, J. M., Pedio, M., Pedregal, D. J., Pinson, P., Ramos, P., Rapach, D. E., Reade, J. J., Rostami-Tabar, B., Rubaszek, M., Sermpinis, G., Shang, H. L., Spiliotis, E., Syntetos, A. A., Talagala, P. D., Talagala, T. S., Tashman, L., Thomakos, D., Thorarinsdottir, T., Todini, E., Trapero Arenas, J. R., Wang, X., Winkler, R. L., Yusupova, A., and Ziel, F.: Forecasting: theory and practice, Int. J. Forecast., 38, 705–871,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2021.11.001, 2022.
a
Philip, S., Kew, S., van Oldenborgh, G. J., Otto, F., Vautard, R., van der Wiel, K., King, A., Lott, F., Arrighi, J., Singh, R., and van Aalst, M.: A protocol for probabilistic extreme event attribution analyses, Adv. Stat. Climatol. Meteorol. Oceanogr., 6, 177–203,
https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-6-177-2020, 2020.
a
Piazzi, G., Thirel, G., Perrin, C., and Delaigue, O.: Sequential Data Assimilation for Streamflow Forecasting: Assessing the Sensitivity to Uncertainties and Updated Variables of a Conceptual Hydrological Model at Basin Scale, Water Resour. Res., 57,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR028390, 2021.
a
Pölz, A., Blaschke, A. P., Komma, J., Farnleitner, A. H., and Derx, J.: Transformer Versus LSTM: A Comparison of Deep Learning Models for Karst Spring Discharge Forecasting, Water Resour. Res., 60, e2022WR032602,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2022WR032602, 2024.
a
Rahbar, A., Mirarabi, A., Nakhaei, M., Talkhabi, M., and Jamali, M.: A Comparative Analysis of Data-Driven Models (SVR, ANFIS, and ANNs) for Daily Karst Spring Discharge Prediction, Water Resour. Res., 36, 589–609,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-021-03041-9, 2022.
a
Rentschler, J., Avner, P., Marconcini, M., Su, R., Strano, E., Vousdoukas, M., and Hallegatte, S.: Global evidence of rapid urban growth in flood zones since 1985, Nature, 622, 87–92,
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06468-9, 2023.
a
Rosenblatt, F.: The perceptron: A probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain., Psycholog. Rev., 65, 386–408,
https://doi.org/10.1037/h0042519, 1958.
a
Saint Fleur, B. E., Artigue, G., Johannet, A., and Pistre, S.: Deep Multilayer Perceptron for Knowledge Extraction: Understanding the Gardon de Mialet Flash Floods Modeling, in: Theory and Applications of Time Series Analysis, edited by: Valenzuela, O., Rojas, F., Herrera, L. J., Pomares, H., and Rojas, I., Springer International Publishing, Cham, 333–348, ISBN 978-3-030-56219-9, 2020.
a,
b
Saint-Fleur, B. E., Allier, S., Lassara, E., Rivet, A., Artigue, G., Pistre, S., and Johannet, A.: Towards a better consideration of rainfall and hydrological spatial features by a deep neural network model to improve flash floods forecasting: case study on the Gardon basin, France, Model. Earth Syst. Environ., 9, 3693–3708,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-022-01650-w, 2023.
a
Seillier-Moiseiwitsch, F. and Dawid, A. P.: On Testing the Validity of Sequential Probability Forecasts, J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 88, 355–359,
https://doi.org/10.2307/2290731, 1993.
a
Slater, L. J., Villarini, G., and Bradley, A. A.: Evaluation of the skill of North-American Multi-Model Ensemble (NMME) Global Climate Models in predicting average and extreme precipitation and temperature over the continental USA, Clim. Dynam., 53, 7381–7396,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-3286-1, 2019.
a
Talagrand, O., Vautard, R., and Strauss, B.: Evaluation of probabilistic prediction systems, PhD thesis, Shinfield Park, Reading, 1997.
a,
b
Terven, J., Cordova-Esparza, D.-M., Romero-González, J.-A., Ramírez-Pedraza, A., and Chávez-Urbiola, E. A.: A comprehensive survey of loss functions and metrics in deep learning, Artif. Intel. Rev., 58, 195,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-025-11198-7, 2025.
a,
b
van der Walt, S., Colbert, S. C., and Varoquaux, G.: The NumPy Array: A Structure for Efficient Numerical Computation, Comput. Sci. Eng., 13, 22–30,
https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2011.37, 2011.
a
van Rossum, G.: Python tutorial, CWI – Centrum voor Wiskunde en Informatica, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 1995. a
Vitart, F., Ardilouze, C., Bonet, A., Brookshaw, A., Chen, M., Codorean, C., Déqué, M., Ferranti, L., Fucile, E., Fuentes, M., Hendon, H., Hodgson, J., Kang, H.-S., Kumar, A., Lin, H., Liu, G., Liu, X., Malguzzi, P., Mallas, I., Manoussakis, M., Mastrangelo, D., MacLachlan, C., McLean, P., Minami, A., Mladek, R., Nakazawa, T., Najm, S., Nie, Y., Rixen, M., Robertson, A. W., Ruti, P., Sun, C., Takaya, Y., Tolstykh, M., Venuti, F., Waliser, D., Woolnough, S., Wu, T., Won, D.-J., Xiao, H., Zaripov, R., and Zhang, L.: The Subseasonal to Seasonal (S2S) Prediction Project Database, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 98, 163–173,
https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0017.1, 2017.
a
Werbos, P.: Beyond regression: New tools for prediction and analysis in the behavioral sciences, PhD thesis, Committee on Applied Mathematics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA,
https://gwern.net/doc/ai/nn/1974-werbos.pdf (last access: 5 June 2026), 1974. a
Wunsch, A., Liesch, T., and Broda, S.: Groundwater level forecasting with artificial neural networks: a comparison of long short-term memory (LSTM), convolutional neural networks (CNNs), and non-linear autoregressive networks with exogenous input (NARX), Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 1671–1687,
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-1671-2021, 2021.
a
Yang, C., Yuan, H., and Su, X.: Bias correction of ensemble precipitation forecasts in the improvement of summer streamflow prediction skill, J. Hydrol., 588, 124955,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124955, 2020.
a
Yang, Y., Pan, M., Feng, D., Xiao, M., Dixon, T., Hartman, R., Shen, C., Song, Y., Sengupta, A., Delle Monache, L., and Ralph, F. M.: Improving streamflow simulation through machine learning-powered data integration and its potential for forecasting in the Western U.S., Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 5453–5476,
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-5453-2025, 2025.
a,
b
Zalachori, I., Ramos, M.-H., Garçon, R., Mathevet, T., and Gailhard, J.: Statistical processing of forecasts for hydrological ensemble prediction: a comparative study of different bias correction strategies, Adv. Sci. Res., 8, 135–141,
https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-8-135-2012, 2012.
a
