Articles | Volume 30, issue 8
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-2373-2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-2373-2026
Research article
 | 
27 Apr 2026
Research article |  | 27 Apr 2026

Never Train a Deep Learning Model on a Single Well? Revisiting Training Strategies for Groundwater Level Prediction

Marc Ohmer and Tanja Liesch

Viewed

Total article views: 973 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
514 423 36 973 23 49
  • HTML: 514
  • PDF: 423
  • XML: 36
  • Total: 973
  • BibTeX: 23
  • EndNote: 49
Views and downloads (calculated since 06 Oct 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 06 Oct 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 973 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 917 with geography defined and 56 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 27 Apr 2026
Download
Short summary
We compared global vs. local deep learning models for groundwater level prediction using ~3,000 wells across Germany. Unlike surface water, groundwater is complex and data-scarce. Results: global models show no systematic accuracy advantage over local ones. Data similarity matters more than quantity for better predictions. Successful groundwater modeling requires strategies tailored to these unique complexities, not just larger datasets.
Share